BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34087955)

  • 1. Test-retest and time dependent variation and diagnostic values of vibratory sensation determined by biothesiometer and the Rydel-Seiffer tuning fork.
    Wittenberg B; Svendsen TK; Gaist LM; Itani M; Gylfadottir SS; Jensen TS; Gaist D; Sindrup SH; Krøigård T
    Brain Behav; 2021 Aug; 11(8):e2230. PubMed ID: 34087955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vibratory testing with the 64 Hz Rydel-Seiffer tuning fork and its relation to the sural nerve action potential.
    Xirou S; Kokotis P; Zambelis T; Anagnostou E
    J Peripher Nerv Syst; 2020 Dec; 25(4):395-400. PubMed ID: 33107143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Proposal of a new method for the use of the Rydel-Seiffer tuning fork in the screening of diabetic polyneuropathy. A pilot study.
    de Simone R; Rabitti PG; De Feo EM; Manguso F; Piscopo G; Scionti L
    Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2015 May; 108(2):e21-4. PubMed ID: 25773377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The value of the Rydel-Seiffer tuning fork as a predictor of diabetic polyneuropathy compared with a neurothesiometer.
    Kästenbauer T; Sauseng S; Brath H; Abrahamian H; Irsigler K
    Diabet Med; 2004 Jun; 21(6):563-7. PubMed ID: 15154940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The tuning fork revisited.
    Liniger C; Albeanu A; Bloise D; Assal JP
    Diabet Med; 1990 Dec; 7(10):859-64. PubMed ID: 2149682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measuring vibration threshold with a graduated tuning fork in normal aging and in patients with polyneuropathy. European Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) group.
    Martina IS; van Koningsveld R; Schmitz PI; van der Meché FG; van Doorn PA
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1998 Nov; 65(5):743-7. PubMed ID: 9810949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sensory exam with a quantitative tuning fork: rapid, sensitive and predictive of SNAP amplitude.
    Pestronk A; Florence J; Levine T; Al-Lozi MT; Lopate G; Miller T; Ramneantu I; Waheed W; Stambuk M
    Neurology; 2004 Feb; 62(3):461-4. PubMed ID: 14872031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of the Rydel-Seiffer graduated tuning fork in the assessment of vibration threshold in postherpetic neuralgia patients and healthy controls.
    Whitton TL; Johnson RW; Lovell AT
    Eur J Pain; 2005 Apr; 9(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 15737809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnostic accuracy of qualitative versus quantitative tuning forks: outcome measure for neuropathy.
    Lai S; Ahmed U; Bollineni A; Lewis R; Ramchandren S
    J Clin Neuromuscul Dis; 2014 Mar; 15(3):96-101. PubMed ID: 24534830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of clinical tools and their diagnostic use in distal symmetric polyneuropathy.
    Pourhamidi K; Dahlin LB; Englund E; Rolandsson O
    Prim Care Diabetes; 2014 Apr; 8(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 23664849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Choosing a Vibratory Test to Pair With Semmes Weinstein Monofilament Testing for Evaluating Lower Extremity Sensation in Patients With Diabetes: A Comparison of Three Vibratory Methodologies.
    Raymond B; Steriovski J; Gillyard K; Yang C; Wu SC; Crews RT
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2020 Jan; 14(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 31113243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The conventional tuning fork as a quantitative tool for vibration threshold.
    Alanazy MH; Alfurayh NA; Almweisheer SN; Aljafen BN; Muayqil T
    Muscle Nerve; 2018 Jan; 57(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 28466970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can the 128-Hz tuning fork be an alternative to the biothesiometer for diabetic peripheral neuropathy screening? A cross-sectional study in a tertiary hospital in East India.
    Chattopadhyay S; Goswami S; Sengupta N; Baidya A
    BMJ Open; 2024 Jun; 14(6):e082193. PubMed ID: 38862223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Screening for peripheral neuropathies in children with diabetes: a systematic review.
    Hirschfeld G; von Glischinski M; Blankenburg M; Zernikow B
    Pediatrics; 2014 May; 133(5):e1324-30. PubMed ID: 24709928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic Accuracy of Clinical Methods for Detection of Diabetic Sensory Neuropathy.
    Arshad AR; Alvi KY
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2016 May; 26(5):374-9. PubMed ID: 27225141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Foot screening technique in a diabetic population.
    Shin JB; Seong YJ; Lee HJ; Kim SH; Park JR
    J Korean Med Sci; 2000 Feb; 15(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 10719814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Non-invasive assessment of vibration perception and protective sensation in people with diabetes mellitus: inter- and intra-rater reliability.
    Lanting SM; Spink MJ; Tehan PE; Vickers S; Casey SL; Chuter VH
    J Foot Ankle Res; 2020; 13():3. PubMed ID: 31988664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measuring vibration sensations with graduated tuning fork. Simple and reliable means to detect diabetic patients at risk of neuropathic foot ulceration.
    Thivolet C; el Farkh J; Petiot A; Simonet C; Tourniaire J
    Diabetes Care; 1990 Oct; 13(10):1077-80. PubMed ID: 2209306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rydel-Seiffer fork revisited: Beyond a simple case of black and white.
    Panosyan FB; Mountain JM; Reilly MM; Shy ME; Herrmann DN
    Neurology; 2016 Aug; 87(7):738-40. PubMed ID: 27412138
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Normative values of vibratory perception in 530 children, juveniles and adults aged 3-79 years.
    Hilz MJ; Axelrod FB; Hermann K; Haertl U; Duetsch M; Neundörfer B
    J Neurol Sci; 1998 Aug; 159(2):219-25. PubMed ID: 9741411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.