These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

58 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3408853)

  • 1. A radiographic test object for the LDR Selectron remote afterloading system.
    Lambert GD; Lambert K
    Br J Radiol; 1988 Jul; 61(727):637-8. PubMed ID: 3408853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Rectal shielding for a Selectron-ring applicator system (HDR- and LDR-afterloading)].
    Hetzel H; Kamleitner H; McCoy M; Frommhold H
    Strahlenther Onkol; 1987 Dec; 163(12):782-6. PubMed ID: 3424077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Technical note: an integrated phantom for HDR quality control.
    Aldrich JE; Samant SS
    Br J Radiol; 1993 Apr; 66(784):363-5. PubMed ID: 8495292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality assurance for variable-length catheters with an afterloading brachytherapy device.
    Evans MD; Arsenault CJ; Podgorsak MB
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(1):251-3. PubMed ID: 8455508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Problems of cervical cancer and presentation of a new ring applicator for the afterloading technic with the selectron].
    Halama J; Strüter HD; Rogge B; Falk W
    Strahlentherapie; 1984 Apr; 160(4):207-19. PubMed ID: 6719510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gynaecological treatments using the Selectron remote afterloading system.
    Dean EM; Lambert GD; Dawes PJ
    Br J Radiol; 1988 Nov; 61(731):1053-7. PubMed ID: 3208009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Treatment delays using an automated afterloading low-dose-rate brachytherapy system.
    DesRosiers CM; Slessinger E; Schilder J; Stehman F; Das IJ; DesRosiers P; Cardenes H; Johnstone PA
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Nov; 6(11):800-3. PubMed ID: 19878888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new test object for evaluating resolu- tion in serial angiography.
    Stanton L; Matsumoto K; Pyenson J; Lightfoot DA
    Radiology; 1969 Nov; 93(5):1190-3. PubMed ID: 5350693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [A quality assurance program for simulators in radiotherapy. 1: The universal phantom for quality control of therapy simulators and teletherapy equipment].
    Baltas D; Müller-Sievers K; Kober B
    Strahlenther Onkol; 1993 May; 169(5):296-303. PubMed ID: 8503089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Review on the afterloading technics in gynecological radiotherapy].
    Rotte K
    Strahlentherapie; 1975 Sep; 150(3):237-42. PubMed ID: 1108304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The advantages of remote afterloading within the selectron system.
    Hunter RD
    Strahlentherapie Sonderb; 1981; 76():328-30. PubMed ID: 7303119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Specifications of a high dose rate remote controlled afterloading system for intracavitary and intraluminal radiation therapy (Selectron).
    van't Hooft E
    Sonderb Strahlenther Onkol; 1988; 82():290-1. PubMed ID: 3134727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital subtraction angiography system evaluation with phantoms.
    Wenstrup RS; Sweeney KP; Scholz FJ
    Radiology; 1985 Jun; 155(3):805-9. PubMed ID: 3890013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scanography with rotation of the radiographic tube: a new method.
    Korbuly D; Moore R; Formanek A; Castaneda-Zuniga W; Justich E; Amplatz K
    Radiology; 1980 May; 135(2):495-9. PubMed ID: 7367646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Direct radiographic magnification: evaluation of three microfocus x-ray tubes.
    De Smet AA; Fritz SL; Templeton AW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Jan; 138(1):139-42. PubMed ID: 6976689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [A new multi-channel LDR/MDR-afterloading-system (Inter-Pal-C38)].
    Thiel HJ; Herbst M; Fietkau R; Sauer R; Müller RG; Müller W; Puthawala A; Stauner J
    Strahlenther Onkol; 1989 Nov; 165(11):802-6. PubMed ID: 2595528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A preliminary investigation of the imaging performance of photostimulable phosphor computed radiography using a new design of mammographic quality control test object.
    Cowen AR; Brettle DS; Coleman NJ; Parkin GJ
    Br J Radiol; 1992 Jun; 65(774):528-35. PubMed ID: 1628185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Technique charts: the key to radiographic quality.
    Eastman TR
    Radiol Technol; 1975; 46(5):365-8. PubMed ID: 1118546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Technical factors, quality control, relevance of doctor's statements (author's transl)].
    Lissner J
    Rontgenblatter; 1979 Nov; 32(11):581-90. PubMed ID: 515649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Therapy using a new remote-controlled high-intensity afterloading device.
    Seay DG; Hilbert JW; Moeller J; Alderman SJ; Von Essen CF
    Radiology; 1972 Dec; 105(3):709-11. PubMed ID: 4117864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.