These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34091668)
1. Accuracy Evaluation of the Computer-Designed Selective Laser Sintering Surgical Guide for Flapless Immediate Loading Dental Implants Surgery in Edentulous Jaws. de Almeida Prado Di Giacomo G; Cury P; da Silva AM; da Silva JVL; Pompeo Souto CE; Martines RT; Ajzen S J Oral Implantol; 2022 Aug; 48(4):263-268. PubMed ID: 34091668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy and complications of computer-designed selective laser sintering surgical guides for flapless dental implant placement and immediate definitive prosthesis installation. Di Giacomo GA; da Silva JV; da Silva AM; Paschoal GH; Cury PR; Szarf G J Periodontol; 2012 Apr; 83(4):410-9. PubMed ID: 21819249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of implant surgical guides fabricated using computer numerical control milling for edentulous jaws: a pilot clinical trial. Chai J; Liu X; Schweyen R; Setz J; Pan S; Liu J; Zhou Y BMC Oral Health; 2020 Oct; 20(1):288. PubMed ID: 33087073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates. Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Boumans T; de Haan AF; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 17(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 23879524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An in vitro model to evaluate the accuracy of guided surgery systems. Soares MM; Harari ND; Cardoso ES; Manso MC; Conz MB; Vidigal GM Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(4):824-31. PubMed ID: 22848884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Impact of Surgical Guide Fixation and Implant Location on Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery. Pessoa R; Siqueira R; Li J; Saleh I; Meneghetti P; Bezerra F; Wang HL; Mendonça G J Prosthodont; 2022 Feb; 31(2):155-164. PubMed ID: 33904640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical accuracy of flapless computer-guided surgery for implant placement in edentulous arches. Vieira DM; Sotto-Maior BS; Barros CA; Reis ES; Francischone CE Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(5):1347-51. PubMed ID: 24066327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study. Valente F; Schiroli G; Sbrenna A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 19492638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The accuracy of dynamic computer assisted implant surgery in fully edentulous jaws: A retrospective case series. Wang J; Ge Y; Mühlemann S; Pan S; Jung RE Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Nov; 34(11):1278-1288. PubMed ID: 37642206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computer-guided versus free-hand placement of immediately loaded dental implants: 1-year post-loading results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Pozzi A; Tallarico M; Marchetti M; Scarfò B; Esposito M Eur J Oral Implantol; 2014; 7(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 25237668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An Sharma A; Agarwal SK; Parkash H; Mehra P; Nagpal A Indian J Dent Res; 2019; 30(2):254-260. PubMed ID: 31169159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy evaluation of computer-guided implant surgery associated with prototyped surgical guides. Cunha RM; Souza FÁ; Hadad H; Poli PP; Maiorana C; Carvalho PSP J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):266-272. PubMed ID: 32111393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dynamic and static computer-assisted implant surgery for completely edentulous patients. A proof of a concept. Pomares-Puig C; Sánchez-Garcés MA; Jorba-García A J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104443. PubMed ID: 36720424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of flapless surgery using an autonomous robotic system in full-arch immediate implant restoration: A case series. Shu Q; Chen D; Wang X; Liu Q; Ge Y; Su Y J Dent; 2024 Jun; 145():105017. PubMed ID: 38657725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A clinically relevant validation method for implant placement after virtual planning. Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Boumans T; Schutyser F; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Nov; 24(11):1265-72. PubMed ID: 22905668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A prospective study on the accuracy of mucosally supported stereolithographic surgical guides in fully edentulous maxillae. D'haese J; Van De Velde T; Elaut L; De Bruyn H Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):293-303. PubMed ID: 19906267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prosthetically driven, computer-guided implant planning for the edentulous maxilla: a model study. Katsoulis J; Pazera P; Mericske-Stern R Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):238-45. PubMed ID: 18783423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants. Ersoy AE; Turkyilmaz I; Ozan O; McGlumphy EA J Periodontol; 2008 Aug; 79(8):1339-45. PubMed ID: 18672982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of a Dynamic Dental Implant Navigation System in a Private Practice. Stefanelli LV; DeGroot BS; Lipton DI; Mandelaris GA Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):205–213. PubMed ID: 30521660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of the Yakebot dental implant robotic system versus fully guided static computer-assisted implant surgery template in edentulous jaw implantation: A preliminary clinical study. Wang W; Xu H; Mei D; Zhou C; Li X; Han Z; Zhou X; Li X; Zhao B Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2024 Apr; 26(2):309-316. PubMed ID: 37728030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]