BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34091686)

  • 1. Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Implant-Abutment Connections, Retention Systems, and Restorative Materials in the Implant-Supported Single Crowns Using 3D Finite Element Analysis.
    Lemos CAA; Verri FR; Noritomi PY; de Souza Batista VE; Cruz RS; de Luna Gomes JM; de Oliveira Limírio JPJ; Pellizzer EP
    J Oral Implantol; 2022 Jun; 48(3):194-201. PubMed ID: 34091686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical Effect of Prosthetic Connection and Implant Body Shape in Low-Quality Bone of Maxillary Posterior Single Implant-Supported Restorations.
    de Andrade CL; Carvalho MA; Del Bel Cury AA; Sotto-Maior BS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):e92-7. PubMed ID: 27447166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of bone quality and bone loss level around internal and external connection implants: A finite element analysis study.
    Lemos CAA; Verri FR; Noritomi PY; Kemmoku DT; Souza Batista VE; Cruz RS; de Luna Gomes JM; Pellizzer EP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jan; 125(1):137.e1-137.e10. PubMed ID: 33139058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Single Implant-Supported Prostheses in the Anterior Maxilla, with Different Surgical Techniques and Implant Types.
    Verri FR; Santiago JF; Almeida DA; de Souza Batista VE; Araujo Lemos CA; Mello CC; Pellizzer EP
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(4):e191-e198. PubMed ID: 28708909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of platform connection and abutment material on stress distribution in single anterior implant-supported restorations: a nonlinear 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Carvalho MA; Sotto-Maior BS; Del Bel Cury AA; Pessanha Henriques GE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1096-102. PubMed ID: 24831744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retention System and Splinting on Morse Taper Implants in the Posterior Maxilla by 3D Finite Element Analysis.
    Lemos CAA; Verri FR; Santiago JF; Almeida DAF; Batista VES; Noritomi PY; Pellizzer DP
    Braz Dent J; 2018; 29(1):30-35. PubMed ID: 29267521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the effect of an offset implant configuration in the posterior maxilla with external hexagon implant platform: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    de Souza Batista VE; Verri FR; Almeida DAF; Santiago Junior JF; Lemos CAA; Pellizzer EP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 118(3):363-371. PubMed ID: 28222876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical effect of an occlusal device for patients with an implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis under parafunctional loading: A 3D finite element analysis.
    Silva LS; Verri FR; Lemos CAA; Martins CM; Pellizzer EP; de Souza Batista VE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Aug; 126(2):223.e1-223.e8. PubMed ID: 34099274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Finite element analysis of implant-supported prosthesis with pontic and cantilever in the posterior maxilla.
    de Souza Batista VE; Verri FR; Almeida DA; Santiago Junior JF; Lemos CA; Pellizzer EP
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2017 May; 20(6):663-670. PubMed ID: 28349769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of Connection Types and Implant Number on the Biomechanical Behavior of Mandibular Full-Arch Rehabilitation.
    Sousa RM; Simamoto-Junior PC; Fernandes-Neto AJ; Sloten JV; Jaecques SV; Pessoa RS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):750-60. PubMed ID: 27447140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical effects of different materials for an occlusal device on implant-supported rehabilitation in a tooth clenching situation. A 3D finite element analysis.
    Andrade CS; de Abreu Costa L; Menechelli LG; Lemos CAA; Okamoto R; Verri FR; de Souza Batista VE
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 37675950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Comparison of Torque Stress on Abutment Screw of External Hexagon and Morse Taper Implant.
    Rodrigues EDS; Benetti P; Carli JP; Paranhos LR; Santos PL; Linden MS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1306-1311. PubMed ID: 30602632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical influence of narrow-diameter implants placed at the crestal and subcrestal level in the maxillary anterior region. A 3D finite element analysis.
    Cruz RS; Fernandes E Oliveira HF; Lemos CAA; de Souza Batista VE; Capalbo da Silva R; Verri FR
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Feb; 33(2):180-187. PubMed ID: 36799260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Stress Distribution and Deformation of Four Prosthetic Materials in Full-mouth Rehabilitation with Implants: A Three-dimensional Finite Element Study.
    Chand YB; Mahendra J; Jigeesh N; Mahendra L; Shivasubramanian L; Perika SB
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Nov; 21(11):1210-1217. PubMed ID: 33850065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dental biomechanics of root-analog implants in different bone types.
    Tribst JPM; Dal Piva AMO; Blom EJ; Kleverlaan CJ; Feilzer AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 May; 131(5):905-915. PubMed ID: 36428106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of abutment screw preload in two implant connection systems: A 3D finite element study.
    Jung WK; Lee WS; Kwon HB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Nov; 122(5):474.e1-474.e8. PubMed ID: 31590980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of different abutment and restorative crown materials on stress distribution in single-unit implant-supported restorations: A 3D finite element stress analysis.
    Gökçimen G; Durkan R; Deste Gökay G; Oyar P
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Jun; 33(5):497-505. PubMed ID: 37434476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Different combinations of CAD/CAM materials on the biomechanical behavior of a two-piece prosthetic solution.
    Tribst JPM; Dal Piva AMO; Borges ALS; Bottino MA
    Int J Comput Dent; 2019; 22(2):171-176. PubMed ID: 31134223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical analysis of different implant-abutments interfaces in different bone types: An in silico analysis.
    Pellizzer EP; Lemos CAA; Almeida DAF; de Souza Batista VE; Santiago Júnior JF; Verri FR
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2018 Sep; 90():645-650. PubMed ID: 29853134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Finite element analysis of stress extent at peri-implant bone surrounding external hexagon or Morse taper implants.
    Macedo JP; Pereira J; Faria J; Pereira CA; Alves JL; Henriques B; Souza JCM; López-López J
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Jul; 71():441-447. PubMed ID: 28499606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.