These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34091901)

  • 1. Cognition and covariance in the producer-scrounger game.
    Reichert MS; Morand-Ferron J; Kulahci IG; Firth JA; Davidson GL; Crofts SJ; Quinn JL
    J Anim Ecol; 2021 Nov; 90(11):2497-2509. PubMed ID: 34091901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the importance of accounting for alternative foraging tactics when assessing cognitive performance in wild animals.
    Vernouillet A
    J Anim Ecol; 2021 Nov; 90(11):2474-2477. PubMed ID: 34734419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Food-caching chickadees with specialized spatial cognition do not use scrounging as a stable strategy when learning a spatial task.
    Heinen VK; Pitera AM; Sonnenberg BR; Branch CL; Benedict LM; Welklin JF; Whitenack LE; Bridge ES; Pravosudov VV
    Proc Biol Sci; 2023 Jul; 290(2002):20230900. PubMed ID: 37434529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stable producer-scrounger dynamics in wild birds: sociability and learning speed covary with scrounging behaviour.
    Aplin LM; Morand-Ferron J
    Proc Biol Sci; 2017 Apr; 284(1852):. PubMed ID: 28404775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. To graze or gorge: consistency and flexibility of individual foraging tactics in tits.
    Milligan ND; Radersma R; Cole EF; Sheldon BC
    J Anim Ecol; 2017 Jul; 86(4):826-836. PubMed ID: 28191628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of exploration on the use of producer-scrounger tactics.
    Kurvers RH; Hamblin S; Giraldeau LA
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e49400. PubMed ID: 23185327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cognitive flexibility in the wild: Individual differences in reversal learning are explained primarily by proactive interference, not by sampling strategies, in two passerine bird species.
    Morand-Ferron J; Reichert MS; Quinn JL
    Learn Behav; 2022 Mar; 50(1):153-166. PubMed ID: 35015239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of prior residence and pair bond on scrounging choices in flocks of zebra finches, Taenopygia guttata.
    Beauchamp G
    Behav Processes; 2000 Dec; 52(2-3):131-140. PubMed ID: 11164681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Daily Patterns of Optimal Producer and Scrounger Use under Predation Hazard: A State-Dependent Dynamic Game Analysis.
    Barta Z; Giraldeau LA
    Am Nat; 2000 Apr; 155(4):570-582. PubMed ID: 10753082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Guides and cheats: producer-scrounger dynamics in the human-honeyguide mutualism.
    Cram DL; Lloyd-Jones DJ; van der Wal JEM; Lund J; Buanachique IO; Muamedi M; Nanguar CI; Ngovene A; Raveh S; Boner W; Spottiswoode CN
    Proc Biol Sci; 2023 Nov; 290(2010):20232024. PubMed ID: 37935365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of personality on social foraging: shy barnacle geese scrounge more.
    Kurvers RH; Prins HH; van Wieren SE; van Oers K; Nolet BA; Ydenberg RC
    Proc Biol Sci; 2010 Feb; 277(1681):601-8. PubMed ID: 19864281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An asymmetric producer-scrounger game: body size and the social foraging behavior of coho salmon.
    Phillips JA; Peacock SJ; Bateman A; Bartlett M; Lewis MA; Krkošek M
    Theor Ecol; 2018; 11(4):417-431. PubMed ID: 30931016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Switching spatial scale reveals dominance-dependent social foraging tactics in a wild primate.
    Lee AEG; Cowlishaw G
    PeerJ; 2017; 5():e3462. PubMed ID: 28674647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multiple factors affect discrimination learning performance, but not between-individual variation, in wild mixed-species flocks of birds.
    Reichert MS; Crofts SJ; Davidson GL; Firth JA; Kulahci IG; Quinn JL
    R Soc Open Sci; 2020 Apr; 7(4):192107. PubMed ID: 32431886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scrounger numbers and the inhibition of social learning in pigeons.
    Lefebvre L; Helder R
    Behav Processes; 1997 Sep; 40(3):201-7. PubMed ID: 24895881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Persistent producer-scrounger relationships in bats.
    Harten L; Matalon Y; Galli N; Navon H; Dor R; Yovel Y
    Sci Adv; 2018 Feb; 4(2):e1603293. PubMed ID: 29441356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Experimental evidence that group foragers can converge on predicted producer-scrounger equilibria.
    Mottley K; Giraldeau LA
    Anim Behav; 2000 Sep; 60(3):341-350. PubMed ID: 11007643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Individual differences in plasticity and sampling when playing behavioural games.
    Morand-Ferron J; Varennes E; Giraldeau LA
    Proc Biol Sci; 2011 Apr; 278(1709):1223-30. PubMed ID: 20943695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Skill trade-offs promote persistent individual differences and specialized tactics.
    Dubois F
    Ecol Evol; 2023 Oct; 13(10):e10578. PubMed ID: 37809359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of group size on producer-scrounger strategies of Wistar rats.
    Alfaro L; Cabrera R
    Behav Processes; 2021 Jan; 182():104280. PubMed ID: 33188845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.