These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3409192)

  • 1. Computed radiography utilizing laser-stimulated luminescence: detectability of simulated low-contrast radiographic objects.
    Higashida Y; Moribe N; Hirata Y; Morita K; Doudanuki S; Sonoda Y; Katsuda N; Hiai Y; Misumi W; Matsumoto M
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 1988; 12(3):137-45. PubMed ID: 3409192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Investigation of low-contrast signal detection in computed radiography (CR)].
    Higashida Y; Matsumoto M; Yoshioka S; Takahashi M
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Nov; 49(11):1411-9. PubMed ID: 2602104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 8. Detection of simulated low-contrast objects in digital subtraction angiographic images.
    Ohara K; Chan HP; Doi K; Giger ML; Fujita H
    Med Phys; 1986; 13(3):304-11. PubMed ID: 3724689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of imaging properties of a computed radiography system and screen-film systems.
    Sanada S; Doi K; Xu XW; Yin FF; Giger ML; MacMahon H
    Med Phys; 1991; 18(3):414-20. PubMed ID: 1870484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dose efficiency and low-contrast detectability of an amorphous silicon x-ray detector for digital radiography.
    Aufrichtig R; Xue P
    Phys Med Biol; 2000 Sep; 45(9):2653-69. PubMed ID: 11008963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of the threshold detail detectability of a screen-film combination and computed radiology under conditions relevant to high-kVp chest radiography.
    Launders JH; Cowen AR
    Phys Med Biol; 1995 Aug; 40(8):1393-8. PubMed ID: 7480121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Single-exposure conventional and computed radiography image acquisition.
    Chotas HG; Dobbins JT; Floyd CE; Ravin CE
    Invest Radiol; 1991 May; 26(5):438-45. PubMed ID: 2055742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Low-dose digital computed radiography in pediatric chest imaging.
    Kogutt MS; Jones JP; Perkins DD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Oct; 151(4):775-9. PubMed ID: 3262278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Dependence of the sensitivity of combined intensifying film-screens on the voltage in X-ray tubes].
    Gurvich AM; Katomina RV; Lebedev LA; Stavitskiĭ RV; Kharon IuIa
    Med Tekh; 1984; (4):14-9. PubMed ID: 6482712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Threshold perception performance with computed and screen-film radiography: implications for chest radiography.
    Dobbins JT; Rice JJ; Beam CA; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 1992 Apr; 183(1):179-87. PubMed ID: 1549669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The physics of computed radiography: measurements of pulse height spectra of photostimulable phosphor screens using prompt luminescence.
    Watt KN; Yan K; DeCrescenzo G; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 2005 Dec; 32(12):3589-98. PubMed ID: 16475757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparative contrast media studies using conventional film-screen systems and digital luminescence radiography].
    Christiansen GR; Marks W; Münster F; Prüss H; Quirin A
    Rontgenblatter; 1990 Apr; 43(4):157-62. PubMed ID: 2339258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computed radiography versus screen-film mammography in detection of simulated microcalcifications: a receiver operating characteristic study based on phantom images.
    Shaw CC; Wang T; King JL; Breitenstein DS; Chang TS; Harris KM; Baratz AB; Ganott MA; Reginella R; Sumkin JH; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 1998 Mar; 5(3):173-80. PubMed ID: 9522883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Lung imaging in intensive medicine. A comparison of digital storage-screen imaging and conventional film-screen imaging].
    Busch HP; Winter-Nossek A; Bethke U; Kohler P; Georgi M
    Rofo; 1990 Apr; 152(4):412-6. PubMed ID: 2160100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical experience with an advanced laser digitizer for cost-effective digital radiography.
    MacMahon H; Xu XW; Hoffmann KR; Giger ML; Yoshimura H; Doi K; Carlin M; Kano A; Yao L; Abe K
    Radiographics; 1993 May; 13(3):635-45; discussion 645-6. PubMed ID: 8316670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [An economic comparison between digital luminescence radiography and conventional film processing in intensive care medicine].
    Peters PE; Dykstra DE; Wiesmann W; Schlüchtermann J; Adam D
    Radiologe; 1992 Nov; 32(11):536-40. PubMed ID: 1461981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Phantom study of chest radiography with storage phosphor, selenium, and film-screen systems.
    Kehler M; Lyttkens K; Andersson B; Hochbergs P; Lindberg CG; Medin J; Nordström AJ; Sanfridsson J; Vojciechowski J
    Acta Radiol; 1996 May; 37(3 Pt 1):332-6. PubMed ID: 8845264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Temperature dependence of x-ray induced luminescence from medical x-ray screens.
    Shearer DR; Rowe LE
    Med Phys; 1987; 14(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 3587138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Fracture diagnosis with digital luminescence radiography].
    Klein HM; Wein B; Langen HJ; Glaser KH; Stargardt A; Günther RW
    Rofo; 1991 Jun; 154(6):582-6. PubMed ID: 1648759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating radiographic parameters for mobile chest computed radiography: phantoms, image quality and effective dose.
    Rill LN; Brateman L; Arreola M
    Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2727-35. PubMed ID: 14596311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.