These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34092303)

  • 1. The effect of contextual information on professional judgment: Reliability and biasability of expert workplace safety inspectors.
    MacLean CL; Dror IE
    J Safety Res; 2021 Jun; 77():13-22. PubMed ID: 34092303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An illusion of objectivity in workplace investigation: The cause analysis chart and consistency, accuracy, and bias in judgments.
    MacLean CL; Read JD
    J Safety Res; 2019 Feb; 68():139-148. PubMed ID: 30876505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Trust but verify: The biasing effects of witness opinions and background knowledge in workplace investigations.
    MacLean CL; Miller GS
    J Safety Res; 2024 Jun; 89():33-40. PubMed ID: 38858057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An evaluation of the effects of the occupational safety and health inspectors' supervision in workplaces.
    Niskanen T; Louhelainen K; Hirvonen ML
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Jul; 68():139-55. PubMed ID: 24369914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Design, development and utility validation of TIPA: a tool for inspection performance assessment.
    Suleiman AM; Said IA
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2023 Sep; 29(3):1067-1074. PubMed ID: 35930255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of training, education, professional experience, and need for cognition on accuracy of exposure assessment decision-making.
    Vadali M; Ramachandran G; Banerjee S
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Apr; 56(3):292-304. PubMed ID: 22186374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cognitive bias in workplace investigation: Problems, perspectives and proposed solutions.
    MacLean CL
    Appl Ergon; 2022 Nov; 105():103860. PubMed ID: 35963213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Are inspectors' assessments reliable? Ratings of NHS acute hospital trust services in England.
    Boyd A; Addicott R; Robertson R; Ross S; Walshe K
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2017 Jan; 22(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 27707897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Hierarchical Solution Approach for Occupational Health and Safety Inspectors' Task Assignment Problem.
    Arikan F; Sozen SK
    Saf Health Work; 2021 Jun; 12(2):154-166. PubMed ID: 34178392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determining the prerequisites for effective workplace inspection by the occupational safety and health regulatory authority using cognitive work analysis.
    Suleiman AM
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2022 Sep; 28(3):1403-1418. PubMed ID: 33749542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biasability and reliability of expert forensic document examiners.
    Dror IE; Scherr KC; Mohammed LA; MacLean CL; Cunningham L
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Jan; 318():110610. PubMed ID: 33358191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inspectors' responses to adolescents' assessment of quality of care: a case study on involving adolescents in inspections.
    Rutz S; van de Bovenkamp H; Buitendijk S; Robben P; de Bont A
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Apr; 18(1):226. PubMed ID: 29606117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Meta-analytically quantifying the reliability and biasability of forensic experts.
    Dror I; Rosenthal R
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jul; 53(4):900-3. PubMed ID: 18489557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigation into qualitative discourses of the occupational safety and health inspectors in order to promote enforcement.
    Niskanen T
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2015; 21(4):426-39. PubMed ID: 26693995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. External inspection approaches and involvement of stakeholders' views in inspection following serious incidents - a qualitative mixed methods study from the perspectives of regulatory inspectors.
    Øyri SF; Wiig S; Anderson JE; Bergerød IJ
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2024 Mar; 24(1):300. PubMed ID: 38448964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measuring base-rate bias error in workplace safety investigators.
    MacLean CL; Dror IE
    J Safety Res; 2023 Feb; 84():108-116. PubMed ID: 36868639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Injury narratives in occupational safety and health prevention in Italy.
    Fubini L; Pasqualini O; Ferro E; Marino M; Santoro S; Tosco E; Gilardi L
    Occup Med (Lond); 2019 Dec; 69(7):500-503. PubMed ID: 31677390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. When and why do experts perform exposure measurements? An exploratory study of safety engineers, work environment inspectors, and occupational hygienists.
    Pettersson-Strömbäck AE; Bergdahl IA; Järvholm BG; Nordin S
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 Dec; 3(12):713-7. PubMed ID: 17133692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Expert judgment and occupational hygiene: application to aerosol speciation in the nickel primary production industry.
    Ramachandran G; Banerjee S; Vincent JH
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2003 Aug; 47(6):461-75. PubMed ID: 12890655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Recommendations for inspections of the French nuclear safety authority].
    Rousse C; Chauvet B;
    Cancer Radiother; 2015 Oct; 19(6-7):634-7. PubMed ID: 26321685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.