These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34096845)

  • 1. Comparison of Dermatologist Ratings on Health Care-Specific and General Consumer Websites.
    Waqas B; Cooley V; Lipner SR
    Cutis; 2021 Apr; 107(4):182-184. PubMed ID: 34096845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of Dermatology Practice Online Reviews: Lessons From Qualitative Analysis.
    Smith RJ; Lipoff JB
    JAMA Dermatol; 2016 Feb; 152(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 26606326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of 4999 online physician ratings indicates that most patients give physicians a favorable rating.
    Kadry B; Chu LF; Kadry B; Gammas D; Macario A
    J Med Internet Res; 2011 Nov; 13(4):e95. PubMed ID: 22088924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Do online ratings reflect structural differences in healthcare? The example of German physician-rating websites].
    Meszmer N; Jaegers L; Schöffski O; Emmert M
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2018 Apr; 131-132():73-80. PubMed ID: 29331281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How social media, training, and demographics influence online reviews across three leading review websites for spine surgeons.
    Donnally CJ; Li DJ; Maguire JA; Roth ES; Barker GP; McCormick JR; Rush AJ; Lebwohl NH
    Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):2081-2090. PubMed ID: 29709552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Online Ratings of Facial Plastic Surgeons: Worthwhile Additions to Conventional Patient Experience Surveys.
    Bovenzi CD; Manges KA; Krein H; Heffelfinger R
    Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med; 2021; 23(2):78-89. PubMed ID: 32716653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital Footprint of Academic Vascular Surgeons in the Southern United States on Physician Rating Websites: Cross-sectional Evaluation Study.
    Yan Q; Jensen KJ; Thomas R; Field AR; Jiang Z; Goei C; Davies MG
    JMIR Cardio; 2021 Feb; 5(1):e22975. PubMed ID: 33625359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Examining the Role of Physician Characteristics in Web-Based Verified Primary Care Physician Reviews: Observational Study.
    Sehgal NKR; Rader B; Brownstein JS
    J Med Internet Res; 2024 Jul; 26():e51672. PubMed ID: 39074363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patient-Recorded Physician Ratings: What Can We Learn From 11,527 Online Reviews of Orthopedic Surgeons?
    Yu J; Samuel LT; Yalçin S; Sultan AA; Kamath AF
    J Arthroplasty; 2020 Jun; 35(6S):S364-S367. PubMed ID: 31818501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Online physician review websites poorly correlate to a validated metric of patient satisfaction.
    Chen J; Presson A; Zhang C; Ray D; Finlayson S; Glasgow R
    J Surg Res; 2018 Jul; 227():1-6. PubMed ID: 29804840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Internal Patient Satisfaction Scores at a Cancer Center With Star Ratings on Online Physician-Rating Websites.
    Kim C; Chisholm G; Bevolo A; Shelton B; Kian L; Lewis CM; Garcia EA; Weber RS; Frumovitz M
    JCO Oncol Pract; 2021 Aug; 17(8):e1181-e1188. PubMed ID: 33760627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of Web-Based Consumer Reviews as a Resource for Drug Performance.
    Adusumalli S; Lee H; Hoi Q; Koo SL; Tan IB; Ng PC
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 Aug; 17(8):e211. PubMed ID: 26319108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Web-Based Physician Ratings for California Physicians on Probation.
    Murphy GP; Awad MA; Osterberg EC; Gaither TW; Chumnarnsongkhroh T; Washington SL; Breyer BN
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Aug; 19(8):e254. PubMed ID: 28830852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Chronic Pain Practices: An Evaluation of Positive and Negative Online Patient Reviews.
    Orhurhu MS; Salisu B; Sottosanti E; Abimbola N; Urits I; Jones M; Viswanath O; Kaye AD; Simopoulos T; Orhurhu V
    Pain Physician; 2019 Sep; 22(5):E477-E486. PubMed ID: 31561660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Trends of online ratings of otolaryngologists: what do your patients really think of you?
    Sobin L; Goyal P
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2014 Jul; 140(7):635-8. PubMed ID: 24876073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reporting of Patient Experience Data on Health Systems' Websites and Commercial Physician-Rating Websites: Mixed-Methods Analysis.
    Lagu T; Norton CM; Russo LM; Priya A; Goff SL; Lindenauer PK
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Mar; 21(3):e12007. PubMed ID: 30916654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of Internet Review Site Comments for Spine Surgeons: How Office Staff, Physician Likeability, and Patient Outcome Are Associated With Online Evaluations.
    Donnally CJ; Roth ES; Li DJ; Maguire JA; McCormick JR; Barker GP; Rivera S; Lebwohl NH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Dec; 43(24):1725-1730. PubMed ID: 29975328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Online ratings of orthopedic surgeons: analysis of 2185 reviews.
    Bakhsh W; Mesfin A
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2014 Aug; 43(8):359-63. PubMed ID: 25136868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Crowd-sourced hospital ratings are correlated with patient satisfaction but not surgical safety.
    Synan LT; Eid MA; Lamb CR; Wong SL
    Surgery; 2021 Sep; 170(3):764-768. PubMed ID: 34024472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Physician and Patient Views on Public Physician Rating Websites: A Cross-Sectional Study.
    Holliday AM; Kachalia A; Meyer GS; Sequist TD
    J Gen Intern Med; 2017 Jun; 32(6):626-631. PubMed ID: 28150098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.