These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34096845)

  • 21. Quantitative Ratings and Narrative Comments on Swiss Physician Rating Websites: Frequency Analysis.
    McLennan S
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Jul; 21(7):e13816. PubMed ID: 31350838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Provider-Initiated Patient Satisfaction Reporting Yields Improved Physician Ratings Relative to Online Rating Websites.
    Ricciardi BF; Waddell BS; Nodzo SR; Lange J; Nocon AA; Amundsen S; Tarity TD; McLawhorn AS
    Orthopedics; 2017 Sep; 40(5):304-310. PubMed ID: 28817163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Physician rating websites: do radiologists have an online presence?
    Gilbert K; Hawkins CM; Hughes DR; Patel K; Gogia N; Sekhar A; Duszak R
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Aug; 12(8):867-71. PubMed ID: 26250980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Online Ratings for Vascular Interventional Proceduralists Vary by Physician Specialty.
    Wanken ZJ; Rode JB; Bessen SY; Anderson PB; Barnes JA; Eid MA; Goodney PP
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2021 Jan; 70():27-35. PubMed ID: 32442595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dishonest Physician Reviews: Challenging Physician Online Reviews and the Appeals Process.
    Malhotra R; Reddy A; Jotwani R; Schatman ME; Mehta ND
    J Med Syst; 2023 Dec; 48(1):5. PubMed ID: 38127210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Online Physician Reviews in Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery: What Do Patients Really Want?
    Asanad K; Parameshwar PS; Houman J; Spiegel BM; Daskivich TJ; Anger JT
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2018; 24(2):109-114. PubMed ID: 29474282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Application of Patient Sentiment Analysis to Evaluate Glaucoma Care.
    Vought V; Vought R; Herzog A; Habiel MM
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2024; 7(3):316-322. PubMed ID: 38103732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Does experience matter? A meta-analysis of physician rating websites of Orthopaedic Surgeons.
    Jack RA; Burn MB; McCulloch PC; Liberman SR; Varner KE; Harris JD
    Musculoskelet Surg; 2018 Apr; 102(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 28853024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Patients' evaluations of health care providers in the era of social networking: an analysis of physician-rating websites.
    Lagu T; Hannon NS; Rothberg MB; Lindenauer PK
    J Gen Intern Med; 2010 Sep; 25(9):942-6. PubMed ID: 20464523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. What Do Patients Think About Their Radiation Oncologists? An Assessment of Online Patient Reviews on Healthgrades.
    Prabhu AV; Randhawa S; Clump D; Heron DE; Beriwal S
    Cureus; 2018 Feb; 10(2):e2165. PubMed ID: 29644154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Exploring the Impact of Linguistic Signals Transmission on Patients' Health Consultation Choice: Web Mining of Online Reviews.
    Shah AM; Ali M; Qayyum A; Begum A; Han H; Ariza-Montes A; Araya-Castillo L
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Sep; 18(19):. PubMed ID: 34639266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Do Health Care Providers Use Online Patient Ratings to Improve the Quality of Care? Results From an Online-Based Cross-Sectional Study.
    Emmert M; Meszmer N; Sander U
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Sep; 18(9):e254. PubMed ID: 27644135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Public Awareness and Use of German Physician Ratings Websites: Cross-Sectional Survey of Four North German Cities.
    McLennan S; Strech D; Meyer A; Kahrass H
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Nov; 19(11):e387. PubMed ID: 29122739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An online review of plastic surgeons in southern California.
    Lewis P; Kobayashi E; Gupta S
    Ann Plast Surg; 2015 May; 74 Suppl 1():S66-70. PubMed ID: 25875912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Exploring the impact of online information signals in leveraging the economic returns of physicians.
    Shah AM; Yan X; Shah SAA; Shah SJ; Mamirkulova G
    J Biomed Inform; 2019 Oct; 98():103272. PubMed ID: 31479747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Online Patient Ratings of Hand Surgeons.
    Trehan SK; DeFrancesco CJ; Nguyen JT; Charalel RA; Daluiski A
    J Hand Surg Am; 2016 Jan; 41(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 26710742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A natural language processing approach to uncover patterns among online ratings of otolaryngologists.
    Vasan V; Cheng CP; Lerner DK; Vujovic D; van Gerwen M; Iloreta AM
    J Laryngol Otol; 2023 Dec; 137(12):1384-1388. PubMed ID: 36938802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. How wait-times, social media, and surgeon demographics influence online reviews on leading review websites for joint replacement surgeons.
    Damodar D; Donnally CJ; McCormick JR; Li DJ; Ingrasci GV; Roche MW; Vakharia RM; Law TY; Hernandez VH
    J Clin Orthop Trauma; 2019; 10(4):761-767. PubMed ID: 31316251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [German language physician rating sites].
    Strech D; Reimann S
    Gesundheitswesen; 2012 Aug; 74(8-9):e61-7. PubMed ID: 22189671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Assessing patient satisfaction among ABHRS surgeons: Opportunities to improve.
    Hakimi AA; Yasmeh JP; Foulad DS
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2020 Feb; 19(2):462-465. PubMed ID: 31134743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.