166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34097276)
1. Mutagenicity Evaluation of Nanoparticles by the Ames Assay.
Pan X
Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2326():275-285. PubMed ID: 34097276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mutagenicity of water-soluble ZnO nanoparticles in Ames test.
Yoshida R; Kitamura D; Maenosono S
J Toxicol Sci; 2009 Feb; 34(1):119-22. PubMed ID: 19182441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mutagenicity of water-soluble FePt nanoparticles in Ames test.
Maenosono S; Suzuki T; Saita S
J Toxicol Sci; 2007 Dec; 32(5):575-9. PubMed ID: 18198488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mutagenicity evaluation of pesticide analogs using standard and 6-well miniaturized bacterial reverse mutation tests.
Egorova OV; Ilyushina NA; Rakitskii VN
Toxicol In Vitro; 2020 Dec; 69():105006. PubMed ID: 32976929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [The Ames test as a criterion in hygienic studies of the mutagenic effect of metals].
D'iachenko OZ; Saĭchenko SP; Nadeenko VG; Sharapova NE
Gig Sanit; 1990 Aug; (8):83-5. PubMed ID: 2283079
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Differential genotoxicity of chemical properties and particle size of rare metal and metal oxide nanoparticles.
Hasegawa G; Shimonaka M; Ishihara Y
J Appl Toxicol; 2012 Jan; 32(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 22162085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mutagenicity evaluation of metal oxide nanoparticles by the bacterial reverse mutation assay.
Pan X; Redding JE; Wiley PA; Wen L; McConnell JS; Zhang B
Chemosphere; 2010 Mar; 79(1):113-6. PubMed ID: 20106502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bacterial mutagenicity assays: test methods.
Gatehouse D
Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 817():21-34. PubMed ID: 22147566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mini mutagenicity test: a miniaturized version of the Ames test used in a prescreening assay for point mutagenesis assessment.
Flamand N; Meunier J; Meunier P; Agapakis-Caussé C
Toxicol In Vitro; 2001 Apr; 15(2):105-14. PubMed ID: 11287170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Comparison of the detecting mutagenic effect of two short microbiological tests].
Li YH
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 1992 Nov; 13(6):419-22. PubMed ID: 1576907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bacterial mutagenicity assays: Vehicle and positive control results from the standard Ames assay, the 6- and 24-well miniaturized plate incorporation assays and the Ames II™ assay.
Pant K; Bruce S; Sly J; Klug Laforce M; Springer S; Cecil M; Andrus E; Dakoulas E; Wagner VO; Hewitt NJ; Kulkarni R
Environ Mol Mutagen; 2016 Jul; 57(6):483-96. PubMed ID: 27198925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of microbial tests for the detection of heavy metal genotoxicity.
Codina JC; Pérez-Torrente C; Pérez-García A; Cazorla FM; de Vicente A
Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 1995 Aug; 29(2):260-5. PubMed ID: 7661630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cellular uptake and mutagenic potential of metal oxide nanoparticles in bacterial cells.
Kumar A; Pandey AK; Singh SS; Shanker R; Dhawan A
Chemosphere; 2011 May; 83(8):1124-32. PubMed ID: 21310462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mutagenicity of octane and tetrasodium pyrophosphate in bacterial reverse mutation (Ames) test.
Kim SJ; Rim KT; Kim HY; Yang JS
J Toxicol Sci; 2010 Aug; 35(4):555-62. PubMed ID: 20686342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of 24 chemicals in the six-well bacterial reverse mutation assay to the standard 100-mm Petri plate bacterial reverse mutation assay in two laboratories.
Nicolette J; Dakoulas E; Pant K; Crosby M; Kondratiuk A; Murray J; Sonders P; Kulkarni R; Jayakumar G; Mathur M; Patel A; Vicente R; Datta K; Kolaja K
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2018 Dec; 100():134-160. PubMed ID: 30401633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Salmonella/human S9 mutagenicity test: a collaborative study with 58 compounds.
Hakura A; Shimada H; Nakajima M; Sui H; Kitamoto S; Suzuki S; Satoh T
Mutagenesis; 2005 May; 20(3):217-28. PubMed ID: 15843387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A personally guided tour on some of our data with the Ames assay-A tribute to Professor Bruce Ames.
Rueff J; Rodrigues AS; Kranendonk M
Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2019 Oct; 846():503094. PubMed ID: 31585631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Direct comparison of the Ames microplate format (MPF) test in liquid medium with the standard Ames pre-incubation assay on agar plates by use of equivocal to weakly positive test compounds.
Flückiger-Isler S; Kamber M
Mutat Res; 2012 Aug; 747(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 22579797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mutagenicity of bovine lactoferrin in reverse mutation test.
Yamauchi K; Toida T; Kawai A; Nishimura S; Teraguchi S; Hayasawa H
J Toxicol Sci; 2000 May; 25(2):63-6. PubMed ID: 10845183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of the performance of the Ames MPF™ assay: A multicenter collaborative study with six coded chemicals.
Spiliotopoulos D; Koelbert C; Audebert M; Barisch I; Bellet D; Constans M; Czich A; Finot F; Gervais V; Khoury L; Kirchnawy C; Kitamoto S; Le Tesson A; Malesic L; Matsuyama R; Mayrhofer E; Mouche I; Preikschat B; Prielinger L; Rainer B; Roblin C; Wäse K
Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2024 Jan; 893():503718. PubMed ID: 38272629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
