These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34097276)

  • 1. Mutagenicity Evaluation of Nanoparticles by the Ames Assay.
    Pan X
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2326():275-285. PubMed ID: 34097276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mutagenicity of water-soluble ZnO nanoparticles in Ames test.
    Yoshida R; Kitamura D; Maenosono S
    J Toxicol Sci; 2009 Feb; 34(1):119-22. PubMed ID: 19182441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mutagenicity of water-soluble FePt nanoparticles in Ames test.
    Maenosono S; Suzuki T; Saita S
    J Toxicol Sci; 2007 Dec; 32(5):575-9. PubMed ID: 18198488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mutagenicity evaluation of pesticide analogs using standard and 6-well miniaturized bacterial reverse mutation tests.
    Egorova OV; Ilyushina NA; Rakitskii VN
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2020 Dec; 69():105006. PubMed ID: 32976929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The Ames test as a criterion in hygienic studies of the mutagenic effect of metals].
    D'iachenko OZ; Saĭchenko SP; Nadeenko VG; Sharapova NE
    Gig Sanit; 1990 Aug; (8):83-5. PubMed ID: 2283079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differential genotoxicity of Polygoni Multiflori in rat and human: insights from Ames test and S9 metabolic activation system.
    Bak SM; Back SM; Kim DY; Jung S; Jeung NY; Kim NY; Han KH; Kim YB; Lee BS; Park JH; Cho HJ; Lee HG; Ozden O; Kim SK; Park SH
    Sci Rep; 2024 Sep; 14(1):21433. PubMed ID: 39271730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differential genotoxicity of chemical properties and particle size of rare metal and metal oxide nanoparticles.
    Hasegawa G; Shimonaka M; Ishihara Y
    J Appl Toxicol; 2012 Jan; 32(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 22162085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mutagenicity evaluation of metal oxide nanoparticles by the bacterial reverse mutation assay.
    Pan X; Redding JE; Wiley PA; Wen L; McConnell JS; Zhang B
    Chemosphere; 2010 Mar; 79(1):113-6. PubMed ID: 20106502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bacterial mutagenicity assays: test methods.
    Gatehouse D
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 817():21-34. PubMed ID: 22147566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mini mutagenicity test: a miniaturized version of the Ames test used in a prescreening assay for point mutagenesis assessment.
    Flamand N; Meunier J; Meunier P; Agapakis-Caussé C
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2001 Apr; 15(2):105-14. PubMed ID: 11287170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimizing the detection of N-nitrosamine mutagenicity in the Ames test.
    Heflich RH; Bishop ME; Mittelstaedt RA; Yan J; Guerrero SK; Sims AM; Mitchell K; Moore N; Li X; Mei N; Elespuru RK; King ST; Keire DA; Kruhlak NL; Dorsam RT; Raw AS; Davis Bruno KL; McGovern TJ; Atrakchi AH
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2024 Nov; 153():105709. PubMed ID: 39343352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparison of the detecting mutagenic effect of two short microbiological tests].
    Li YH
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 1992 Nov; 13(6):419-22. PubMed ID: 1576907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bacterial mutagenicity assays: Vehicle and positive control results from the standard Ames assay, the 6- and 24-well miniaturized plate incorporation assays and the Ames II™ assay.
    Pant K; Bruce S; Sly J; Klug Laforce M; Springer S; Cecil M; Andrus E; Dakoulas E; Wagner VO; Hewitt NJ; Kulkarni R
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2016 Jul; 57(6):483-96. PubMed ID: 27198925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of microbial tests for the detection of heavy metal genotoxicity.
    Codina JC; Pérez-Torrente C; Pérez-García A; Cazorla FM; de Vicente A
    Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 1995 Aug; 29(2):260-5. PubMed ID: 7661630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cellular uptake and mutagenic potential of metal oxide nanoparticles in bacterial cells.
    Kumar A; Pandey AK; Singh SS; Shanker R; Dhawan A
    Chemosphere; 2011 May; 83(8):1124-32. PubMed ID: 21310462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mutagenicity of octane and tetrasodium pyrophosphate in bacterial reverse mutation (Ames) test.
    Kim SJ; Rim KT; Kim HY; Yang JS
    J Toxicol Sci; 2010 Aug; 35(4):555-62. PubMed ID: 20686342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of 24 chemicals in the six-well bacterial reverse mutation assay to the standard 100-mm Petri plate bacterial reverse mutation assay in two laboratories.
    Nicolette J; Dakoulas E; Pant K; Crosby M; Kondratiuk A; Murray J; Sonders P; Kulkarni R; Jayakumar G; Mathur M; Patel A; Vicente R; Datta K; Kolaja K
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2018 Dec; 100():134-160. PubMed ID: 30401633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Salmonella/human S9 mutagenicity test: a collaborative study with 58 compounds.
    Hakura A; Shimada H; Nakajima M; Sui H; Kitamoto S; Suzuki S; Satoh T
    Mutagenesis; 2005 May; 20(3):217-28. PubMed ID: 15843387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A personally guided tour on some of our data with the Ames assay-A tribute to Professor Bruce Ames.
    Rueff J; Rodrigues AS; Kranendonk M
    Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2019 Oct; 846():503094. PubMed ID: 31585631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Direct comparison of the Ames microplate format (MPF) test in liquid medium with the standard Ames pre-incubation assay on agar plates by use of equivocal to weakly positive test compounds.
    Flückiger-Isler S; Kamber M
    Mutat Res; 2012 Aug; 747(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 22579797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.