These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3409823)

  • 21. The diagnostic "gold standard" in oncology: increasing importance and increasing concerns.
    Markman M
    Curr Oncol Rep; 2006 Jul; 8(4):237-8. PubMed ID: 17269188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Anticipating missing reference standard data when planning diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Naaktgeboren CA; de Groot JA; Rutjes AW; Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Moons KG
    BMJ; 2016 Feb; 352():i402. PubMed ID: 26861453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Good interpretation of the results of a diagnostic test.
    Veziris N; Jarlier V
    Clin Infect Dis; 2003 Oct; 37(8):1143; author reply 1143-4. PubMed ID: 14523783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Statistical significance, power and sample size - what does it all mean?
    Christley RM
    J Small Anim Pract; 2008 Jun; 49(6):263. PubMed ID: 18510495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Exploring sources of heterogeneity in systematic reviews of diagnostic tests.
    Lijmer JG; Bossuyt PM; Heisterkamp SH
    Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(11):1525-37. PubMed ID: 12111918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Validity of diagnostic tests].
    Valenzuela D L; Cifuentes A L
    Rev Med Chil; 2008 Mar; 136(3):401-4. PubMed ID: 18575669
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Weighted 2 x 2 kappa coefficients: recommended indices of diagnostic accuracy for evidence-based practice.
    Gilchrist JM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Oct; 62(10):1045-53. PubMed ID: 19278830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests].
    Smets P
    Rev Med Brux; 1985 Sep; 6(7):451-4. PubMed ID: 4081407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Biplot as a diagnostic tool of local dependence in latent class models. A medical application.
    Sepúlveda R; Vicente-Villardón JL; Galindo MP
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(11):1855-69. PubMed ID: 18265437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Estimating disease prevalence in the absence of a gold standard.
    Black MA; Craig BA
    Stat Med; 2002 Sep; 21(18):2653-69. PubMed ID: 12228883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Importance of scientific research design to improve the quality of clinical study].
    Wang J
    Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi; 1999 Jun; 22(6):325-6. PubMed ID: 11775817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [A review of statistical analysis methods in measurement data].
    Cai Y
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2004 Jun; 13(3):198-200. PubMed ID: 15269858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Method of cut point selection biases diagnostic research.
    Ewald B
    Intern Med J; 2008 Jul; 38(7):615; author reply 615-6. PubMed ID: 18715315
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. How to ensure your paper is rejected by the statistical reviewer.
    Stratton IM; Neil A
    Diabet Med; 2005 Apr; 22(4):371-3. PubMed ID: 15787658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. ['Gold standard,' not 'golden standard'].
    Kneepkens CM
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2006 Mar; 150(11):644-5; author reply 645. PubMed ID: 16610511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Prognostic studies in cancer of the breast: optimal use of current statistical tools].
    Bonichon F
    Bull Cancer; 1996 Dec; 83(12):1046-52. PubMed ID: 9116374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of random BMD measurement errors on diagnostic classification using T-scores.
    Blake GM; Shepherd JA
    J Clin Densitom; 2007; 10(4):415-7; author reply 417-8. PubMed ID: 17993402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A toxicologist's guide to studying diagnostic tests.
    Bailey B; Amre DK
    Clin Toxicol (Phila); 2005; 43(3):171-9. PubMed ID: 15902791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Discrepant Analysis and Bias: a Micro-Comic Strip.
    McAdam AJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 2017 Oct; 55(10):2878-2879. PubMed ID: 28947507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Measures of accuracy and performance of diagnostic tests.
    Drobatz KJ
    J Vet Cardiol; 2009 May; 11 Suppl 1():S33-40. PubMed ID: 19451045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.