700 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34098673)
1. [Scan time and accuracy of full-arch scans with intraoral scanners: a comparative study on conditions of the intraoral head-simulator and the hand-held model].
Wu MT; Tang SX; Peng LY; Han YT; Su YC; Wang X
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Jun; 56(6):570-575. PubMed ID: 34098673
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Effect of digital intraoral full-arch scan strategies on scan time and accuracy on conditions of intraoral head-simulator].
Wu MT; Tang SX; Peng LY; Chen DP; Su YC; Wang X
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Nov; 56(11):1092-1097. PubMed ID: 34763404
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of operator experience, scanner type, and scan size on 3D scans.
Resende CCD; Barbosa TAQ; Moura GF; Tavares LDN; Rizzante FAP; George FM; Neves FDD; Mendonça G
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):294-299. PubMed ID: 32115221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of six intraoral scanners for scanning complete-arch and 4-unit fixed partial dentures: An in vitro study.
Diker B; Tak Ö
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Aug; 128(2):187-194. PubMed ID: 33558056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of different scanning strategies on the accuracy of two current intraoral scanning systems in complete-arch impressions: an in vitro study.
Passos L; Meiga S; Brigagão V; Street A
Int J Comput Dent; 2019; 22(4):307-319. PubMed ID: 31840139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Accuracy of three intraoral scans for primary impressions of edentulous jaws].
Cao Y; Chen JK; Deng KH; Wang Y; Sun YC; Zhao YJ
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Feb; 52(1):129-137. PubMed ID: 32071476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro.
Ender A; Zimmermann M; Mehl A
Int J Comput Dent; 2019; 22(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 30848250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of scan pattern on complete-arch scans with 4 digital scanners.
Latham J; Ludlow M; Mennito A; Kelly A; Evans Z; Renne W
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 30982616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical Study of the Influence of Ambient Light Scanning Conditions on the Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of an Intraoral Scanner.
Revilla-León M; Subramanian SG; Özcan M; Krishnamurthy VR
J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):107-113. PubMed ID: 31860144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intraoral digital scans-Part 1: Influence of ambient scanning light conditions on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of different intraoral scanners.
Revilla-León M; Jiang P; Sadeghpour M; Piedra-Cascón W; Zandinejad A; Özcan M; Krishnamurthy VR
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Sep; 124(3):372-378. PubMed ID: 31864638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of ambient light conditions on the accuracy and scanning time of seven intraoral scanners in complete-arch implant scans.
Ochoa-López G; Cascos R; Antonaya-Martín JL; Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M
J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104138. PubMed ID: 35461973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of rescanning mesh holes and stitching procedures on the complete-arch scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner: An in vitro study.
Gómez-Polo M; Piedra-Cascón W; Methani MM; Quesada-Olmo N; Farjas-Abadia M; Revilla-León M
J Dent; 2021 Jul; 110():103690. PubMed ID: 33991598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of complete-arch intraoral scans based on confocal microscopy versus optical triangulation: A comparative in vitro study.
Waldecker M; Rues S; Rammelsberg P; Bömicke W
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Sep; 126(3):414-420. PubMed ID: 32950254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of scan technology on the accuracy and speed of intraoral scanning systems for the edentulous maxilla: An in vitro study.
Osman RB; Alharbi NM
J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; 32(9):821-828. PubMed ID: 36571837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Understanding the effect of scan spans on the accuracy of intraoral and desktop scanners.
Chen Y; Zhai Z; Watanabe S; Nakano T; Ishigaki S
J Dent; 2022 Sep; 124():104220. PubMed ID: 35817227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of software updates on the trueness and precision of intraoral scanners.
Vág J; Renne W; Revell G; Ludlow M; Mennito A; Teich ST; Gutmacher Z
Quintessence Int; 2021 Jun; 52(7):636-644. PubMed ID: 33749223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Influence of trueness for local finish lines of a full crown preparation on that of complete finish line].
Jiang N; Bao XD; Yue L
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Sep; 53(1):102-108. PubMed ID: 33550343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intraoral Scans of Full Dental Arches: An In Vitro Measurement Study of the Accuracy of Different Intraoral Scanners.
Giuliodori G; Rappelli G; Aquilanti L
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Mar; 20(6):. PubMed ID: 36981684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Positional trueness of abutments by using a digital die-merging protocol compared with complete arch direct digital scans and conventional dental impressions.
Jelicich A; Scialabba R; Lee SJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Feb; 131(2):293-300. PubMed ID: 35430047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Complete-arch accuracy of intraoral scanners.
Treesh JC; Liacouras PC; Taft RM; Brooks DI; Raiciulescu S; Ellert DO; Grant GT; Ye L
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):382-388. PubMed ID: 29724554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
