700 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34098673)
21. Comparative reproducibility analysis of 6 intraoral scanners used on complex intracoronal preparations.
Park JM; Kim RJ; Lee KW
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):113-120. PubMed ID: 31027953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Trueness and precision of complete arch dentate digital models produced by intraoral and desktop scanners: An ex-vivo study.
Vag J; Stevens CD; Badahman MH; Ludlow M; Sharp M; Brenes C; Mennito A; Renne W
J Dent; 2023 Dec; 139():104764. PubMed ID: 37898433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of scan powder and scanning technology on measured deviations of complete-arch implant supported frameworks digitized with industrial and intraoral scanners.
Donmez MB; Çakmak G; Dede DÖ; Küçükekenci AS; Lu WE; Schumacher FL; Revilla-León M; Yilmaz B
J Dent; 2023 Nov; 138():104736. PubMed ID: 37802291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. In vitro evaluation of the accuracy and precision of intraoral and extraoral complete-arch scans.
Baghani MT; Shayegh SS; Johnston WM; Shidfar S; Hakimaneh SMR
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Nov; 126(5):665-670. PubMed ID: 33070974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Accuracy of Digital Impressions Obtained Using Six Intraoral Scanners in Partially Edentulous Dentitions and the Effect of Scanning Sequence.
Diker B; Tak Ö
Int J Prosthodont; 2021; 34(1):101-108. PubMed ID: 33570525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of pulp chamber depth on the accuracy of endocrown scans made with different intraoral scanners versus an industrial scanner: An in vitro study.
Gurpinar B; Tak O
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Mar; 127(3):430-437. PubMed ID: 33309210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Accuracy and precision of 3 intraoral scanners and accuracy of conventional impressions: A novel in vivo analysis method.
Nedelcu R; Olsson P; Nyström I; Rydén J; Thor A
J Dent; 2018 Feb; 69():110-118. PubMed ID: 29246490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Feasibility of using an intraoral scanner for a complete-arch digital scan.
Park GH; Son K; Lee KB
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 May; 121(5):803-810. PubMed ID: 30598314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Do "cut out-rescan" procedures have an impact on the accuracy of intraoral digital scans?
Reich S; Yatmaz B; Raith S
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jan; 125(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 32059858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Local accuracy of actual intraoral scanning systems for single-tooth preparations in vitro.
Zimmermann M; Ender A; Mehl A
J Am Dent Assoc; 2020 Feb; 151(2):127-135. PubMed ID: 31883705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral scanners for scanning edentulous and dentate complete-arch mandibular casts: A comparative in vitro study.
Braian M; Wennerberg A
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Aug; 122(2):129-136.e2. PubMed ID: 30885584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Accuracy analysis of full-arch implant digital impressions when using a geometric feature].
Ke YF; Zhang YP; Chen JK; Chen H; Wang Y; Sun YC
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Feb; 57(2):162-167. PubMed ID: 35152652
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: a comparative in vitro study.
Imburgia M; Logozzo S; Hauschild U; Veronesi G; Mangano C; Mangano FG
BMC Oral Health; 2017 Jun; 17(1):92. PubMed ID: 28577366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Accuracy of a chairside intraoral scanner compared with a laboratory scanner for the completely edentulous maxilla: An in vitro 3-dimensional comparative analysis.
Zarone F; Ruggiero G; Ferrari M; Mangano F; Joda T; Sorrentino R
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):761.e1-761.e7. PubMed ID: 33289647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Error propagation from intraoral scanning to additive manufacturing of complete-arch dentate models: An in vitro study.
Auškalnis L; Akulauskas M; Jegelevičius D; Simonaitis T; Rutkūnas V
J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104136. PubMed ID: 35460866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A comparative study assessing the precision and trueness of digital and printed casts produced from several intraoral and extraoral scanners in full arch and short span (3-unit FPD) scanning: An in vitro study.
Ellakany P; Aly NM; Al-Harbi F
J Prosthodont; 2023 Jun; 32(5):423-430. PubMed ID: 35852379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Impact of intraoral scanner, scanning strategy, and scanned arch on the scan accuracy of edentulous arches: An in vitro study.
Jamjoom FZ; Aldghim A; Aldibasi O; Yilmaz B
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1218-1225. PubMed ID: 36841708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Accuracy of intraoral scanning in completely and partially edentulous maxillary and mandibular jaws: an in vitro analysis.
Schimmel M; Akino N; Srinivasan M; Wittneben JG; Yilmaz B; Abou-Ayash S
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Apr; 25(4):1839-1847. PubMed ID: 32812098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The effect different substrates have on the trueness and precision of eight different intraoral scanners.
Dutton E; Ludlow M; Mennito A; Kelly A; Evans Z; Culp A; Kessler R; Renne W
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2020 Mar; 32(2):204-218. PubMed ID: 31568660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. In vitro comparison of five desktop scanners and an industrial scanner in the evaluation of an intraoral scanner accuracy.
Borbola D; Berkei G; Simon B; Romanszky L; Sersli G; DeFee M; Renne W; Mangano F; Vag J
J Dent; 2023 Feb; 129():104391. PubMed ID: 36549570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
