These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
716 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34098673)
61. Comparison of conventional, photogrammetry, and intraoral scanning accuracy of complete-arch implant impression procedures evaluated with a coordinate measuring machine. Revilla-León M; Att W; Özcan M; Rubenstein J J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Mar; 125(3):470-478. PubMed ID: 32386912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. In vivo trueness and precision of full-arch implant scans using intraoral scanners with three different acquisition protocols. Nedelcu R; Olsson P; Thulin M; Nyström I; Thor A J Dent; 2023 Jan; 128():104308. PubMed ID: 36481688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Three-dimensional differences between intraoral scans and conventional impressions of edentulous jaws: A clinical study. Lo Russo L; Caradonna G; Troiano G; Salamini A; Guida L; Ciavarella D J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):264-268. PubMed ID: 31153614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Influence of scanning protocol on the accuracy of complete-arch digital implant scans: An in vitro study. Hamilton A; Negreiros WM; Jain S; Finkelman M; Gallucci GO Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Jun; 35(6):641-651. PubMed ID: 38567801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Accuracy of full-arch digitalization for partially edentulous jaws - a laboratory study on basis of coordinate-based data analysis. Kontis P; Güth JF; Keul C Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Apr; 26(4):3651-3662. PubMed ID: 34981252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Accuracy of complete-arch model using an intraoral video scanner: An in vitro study. Jeong ID; Lee JJ; Jeon JH; Kim JH; Kim HY; Kim WC J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Jun; 115(6):755-9. PubMed ID: 26794703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Accuracy of 4 digital scanning systems on prepared teeth digitally isolated from a complete dental arch. Medina-Sotomayor P; Pascual-Moscardo A; Camps A I J Prosthet Dent; 2019 May; 121(5):811-820. PubMed ID: 30598308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Accuracy of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing-generated dental casts based on intraoral scanner data. Patzelt SB; Bishti S; Stampf S; Att W J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Nov; 145(11):1133-40. PubMed ID: 25359645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Full arch digital scanning systems performances for implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: a comparative study of 8 intraoral scanners. Di Fiore A; Meneghello R; Graiff L; Savio G; Vigolo P; Monaco C; Stellini E J Prosthodont Res; 2019 Oct; 63(4):396-403. PubMed ID: 31072730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Accuracy of intraoral scans: An in vivo study of different scanning devices. Kernen F; Schlager S; Seidel Alvarez V; Mehrhof J; Vach K; Kohal R; Nelson K; Flügge T J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Dec; 128(6):1303-1309. PubMed ID: 33902891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Comparing the trueness of seven intraoral scanners and a physical impression on dentate human maxilla by a novel method. Nagy Z; Simon B; Mennito A; Evans Z; Renne W; Vág J BMC Oral Health; 2020 Apr; 20(1):97. PubMed ID: 32264943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. The effect of scanner type and scan body position on the accuracy of complete-arch digital implant scans. Çakmak G; Yilmaz H; Treviño A; Kökat AM; Yilmaz B Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2020 Aug; 22(4):533-541. PubMed ID: 32643259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Scanning Accuracy of 10 Intraoral Scanners for Single-crown and Three-unit Fixed Denture Preparations: An In Vitro Study. Zhang XY; Cao Y; Hu ZW; Wang Y; Chen H; Sun YC Chin J Dent Res; 2022 Sep; 25(3):215-222. PubMed ID: 36102891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Accuracy of 9 intraoral scanners for complete-arch image acquisition: A qualitative and quantitative evaluation. Kim RJ; Park JM; Shim JS J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):895-903.e1. PubMed ID: 30006228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Conventional Versus Digital Complete Arch Implant Impressions. Albayrak B; Sukotjo C; Wee AG; Korkmaz İH; Bayındır F J Prosthodont; 2021 Feb; 30(2):163-170. PubMed ID: 32935894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Influence of age, training, intraoral scanner, and software version on the scan accuracy of inexperienced operators. Zarauz C; Pradíes GJ; Chebib N; Dönmez MB; Karasan D; Sailer I J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; 32(S2):135-141. PubMed ID: 37837217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Application of the virtual-fit method for fixed complete denture cases designed on intraoral scans: Effect of cement spacing. Vag J; Romanszky L; Sersli G; DeFee M; Renne W; Mangano F; Borbola D J Dent; 2024 Feb; 141():104780. PubMed ID: 37981046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner. Flügge TV; Schlager S; Nelson K; Nahles S; Metzger MC Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Sep; 144(3):471-8. PubMed ID: 23992820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Scan accuracy and time efficiency of different implant-supported fixed partial denture situations depending on the intraoral scanner and scanned area: An in vitro study. Donmez MB; Mathey A; Gäumann F; Mathey A; Yilmaz B; Abou-Ayash S J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1198-1207. PubMed ID: 36868987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Accuracy of Intraoral Scanning of Edentulous Jaws with and without Resin Markers. Tao C; Zhao YJ; Sun YC; Heng MD; Xie QF; Pan SX Chin J Dent Res; 2020; 23(4):265-271. PubMed ID: 33491358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]