These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
727 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34098673)
81. Do intraoral scanning technologies affect the trueness of dental arches with crowding, diastema, and edentulous spaces? A clinical perspective. de Freitas BN; Capel CP; Vieira MA; Barbin GF; Cardoso L; Tirapelli C J Dent; 2024 Oct; 149():105285. PubMed ID: 39103077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
82. Accuracy of Intraoral Scanning of Edentulous Jaws with and without Resin Markers. Tao C; Zhao YJ; Sun YC; Heng MD; Xie QF; Pan SX Chin J Dent Res; 2020; 23(4):265-271. PubMed ID: 33491358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
83. Effect of splinting scan bodies on trueness of complete-arch implant impression using different intraoral scanners: an in vitro study. Retana L; Nejat AH; Pozzi A Int J Comput Dent; 2023 Feb; 26(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 35072425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
84. Effect of intraoral scanner and fixed partial denture situation on the scan accuracy of multiple implants: An in vitro study. Donmez MB; Mathey A; Gäumann F; Mathey A; Yilmaz B; Abou-Ayash S Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Jun; 25(3):502-510. PubMed ID: 36762495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
85. Effect of auxiliary geometric devices on the accuracy of intraoral scans in full-arch implant-supported rehabilitations: An in vitro study. Canullo L; Pesce P; Caponio VCA; Iacono R; Luciani FS; Raffone C; Menini M J Dent; 2024 Jun; 145():104979. PubMed ID: 38556193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
86. Accuracy of single implant scans with a combined healing abutment-scan body system and different intraoral scanners: An in vitro study. Çakmak G; Donmez MB; Atalay S; Yilmaz H; Kökat AM; Yilmaz B J Dent; 2021 Oct; 113():103773. PubMed ID: 34384842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
87. Effect of Scanner Type and Scan Body Location on the Accuracy of Mandibular Complete-Arch Digital Implant Scans: An In Vitro Study. Çakmak G; Yilmaz H; Treviño Santos A; Kökat AM; Yilmaz B J Prosthodont; 2022 Jun; 31(5):419-426. PubMed ID: 34453466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
88. Accuracy of Complete-Arch Scans Obtained by Intraoral Scanner and Smartphone Three-Dimensional Scanning Applications With Different Smartphone Position Setups: An In Vitro Study. Jiang Y; Long H; Soo SY; Mavani H; Tew IM Cureus; 2024 Jun; 16(6):e63471. PubMed ID: 39077296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
89. Comparing the accuracy of six intraoral scanners on prepared teeth and effect of scanning sequence. Diker B; Tak Ö J Adv Prosthodont; 2020 Oct; 12(5):299-306. PubMed ID: 33149851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
90. Trueness of intraoral scanners in digitizing specific locations at the margin and intaglio surfaces of intracoronal preparations. Jin-Young Kim R; Benic GI; Park JM J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Dec; 126(6):779-786. PubMed ID: 33176925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
91. Accuracy of photogrammetry, intraoral scanning, and conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation: an in vitro comparative study. Ma B; Yue X; Sun Y; Peng L; Geng W BMC Oral Health; 2021 Dec; 21(1):636. PubMed ID: 34893053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
92. Accuracy of edentulous full-arch implant impression: An in vitro comparison between conventional impression, intraoral scan with and without splinting, and photogrammetry. Cheng J; Zhang H; Liu H; Li J; Wang HL; Tao X Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 May; 35(5):560-572. PubMed ID: 38421115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
93. Time and Accuracy of the CEREC Omnicam Using Two Different Software Programs. Porr DA; Brooks DI; Liacouras PC; Petrich A; Ellert DO; Ye L J Prosthodont; 2022 Feb; 31(2):130-135. PubMed ID: 33851748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
94. Influence of definitive and interim restorative materials and surface finishing on the scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner. Revilla-León M; Young K; Sicilia E; Cho SH; Kois JC J Dent; 2022 May; 120():104114. PubMed ID: 35358659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
95. Full-arch accuracy of five intraoral scanners: Kwon M; Cho Y; Kim DW; Kim M; Kim YJ; Chang M Korean J Orthod; 2021 Mar; 51(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 33678625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
96. Finish line distinctness and accuracy in 7 intraoral scanners versus conventional impression: an in vitro descriptive comparison. Nedelcu R; Olsson P; Nyström I; Thor A BMC Oral Health; 2018 Feb; 18(1):27. PubMed ID: 29471825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
97. Influence of rescanning mesh holes on the accuracy of an intraoral scanner: An in vivo study. Revilla-León M; Quesada-Olmo N; Gómez-Polo M; Sicilia E; Farjas-Abadia M; Kois JC J Dent; 2021 Dec; 115():103851. PubMed ID: 34656658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
98. Does ambient light affect the accuracy and scanning time of intraoral scans? Wesemann C; Kienbaum H; Thun M; Spies BC; Beuer F; Bumann A J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jun; 125(6):924-931. PubMed ID: 32487348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
99. Influence of arch location and scanning pattern on the scanning accuracy, scanning time, and number of photograms of complete-arch intraoral digital implant scans. Gómez-Polo M; Cascos R; Ortega R; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Revilla-León M Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Jun; 34(6):591-601. PubMed ID: 37052054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
100. Use of Intraoral Scanners for Full Dental Arches: Could Different Strategies or Overlapping Software Affect Accuracy? Stefanelli LV; Franchina A; Pranno A; Pellegrino G; Ferri A; Pranno N; Di Carlo S; De Angelis F Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Sep; 18(19):. PubMed ID: 34639250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]