These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34098780)

  • 21. Influences of internal tapered abutment designs on bone stresses around a dental implant: three-dimensional finite element method with statistical evaluation.
    Chu CM; Huang HL; Hsu JT; Fuh LJ
    J Periodontol; 2012 Jan; 83(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 21563947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of placement depth of platform-switched implants on periimplant cortical bone stress: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Rismanchian M; Askari N; Shafiei S
    Implant Dent; 2013 Apr; 22(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 23416848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Implant-bone load transfer mechanisms in complete-arch prostheses supported by four implants: a three-dimensional finite element approach.
    Baggi L; Pastore S; Di Girolamo M; Vairo G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Jan; 109(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 23328192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Biomechanical Comparison of a New Triple Cylindrical Implant Design and a Conventional Cylindrical Implant Design on the Mandible by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Bayrak A; Yaramanoğlu P; Kılıçarslan MA; Yaramanoğlu B; Akat B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(2):257-264. PubMed ID: 32142561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Regular and platform switching: bone stress analysis varying implant type.
    Gurgel-Juarez NC; de Almeida EO; Rocha EP; Freitas AC; Anchieta RB; de Vargas LC; Kina S; França FM
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 22372756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparative evaluation of short or standard implants with different prosthetic designs in the posterior mandibular region: a three-dimensional finite element analysis study.
    Qin S; Gao Z
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2023 Sep; 26(12):1499-1509. PubMed ID: 36125258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of platform switching on stress in peri-implant bone in a condition of marginal bone resorption: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Xia H; Wang M; Ma L; Zhou Y; Li Z; Wang Y
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(3):e122-7. PubMed ID: 23748330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of the prosthetic index on stress distribution in Morse taper connection implant system and peri-implant bone: a 3D finite element analysis.
    Zhang WT; Cheng KJ; Liu YF; Wang R; Chen YF; Ding YD; Yang F; Wang LH
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Sep; 22(1):431. PubMed ID: 36180871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Biomechanical effects of two different collar implant structures on stress distribution under cantilever fixed partial dentures.
    Merıç G; Erkmen E; Kurt A; Eser A; özden AU
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2011 Nov; 69(6):374-84. PubMed ID: 21449688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of bone mass density and alveolar bone resorption on stress in implant restoration of free-end edentulous posterior mandible: Finite element analysis of double-factor sensitivity.
    Ye Z; Ye H; Wu Y; Jiang Z; Yao H; Xu X; Zhang Y; Du W; Li W; Zheng Y; Ye P; Ding X; Wu L
    Ann Anat; 2024 Apr; 253():152210. PubMed ID: 38244942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Stress distribution with extra-short implants in an angled frictional system: A finite element analysis study.
    de Souza Rendohl E; Brandt WC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):728.e1-728.e9. PubMed ID: 32694020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Influence of Different Implants on the Biomechanical Behavior of a Tooth-Implant Fixed Partial Dentures: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Lencioni KA; Noritomi PY; Macedo AP; Ribeiro RF; Pereira AR
    J Oral Implantol; 2020 Feb; 46(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 31647692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Biomechanical evaluation of platform switching in different implant protocols: computed tomography-based three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Pessoa RS; Vaz LG; Marcantonio E; Vander Sloten J; Duyck J; Jaecques SV
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(5):911-9. PubMed ID: 20862404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Biomechanical comparison of axial and tilted implants for mandibular full-arch fixed prostheses.
    Kim KS; Kim YL; Bae JM; Cho HW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):976-84. PubMed ID: 22010079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Implant-Abutment Connections, Retention Systems, and Restorative Materials in the Implant-Supported Single Crowns Using 3D Finite Element Analysis.
    Lemos CAA; Verri FR; Noritomi PY; de Souza Batista VE; Cruz RS; de Luna Gomes JM; de Oliveira Limírio JPJ; Pellizzer EP
    J Oral Implantol; 2022 Jun; 48(3):194-201. PubMed ID: 34091686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Influence of Implant Inclination and Prosthetic Abutment Type on the Biomechanics of Implant-Supported Fixed Partial Dentures.
    Poletto-Neto V; Tretto PHW; Zen BM; Bacchi A; Dos Santos MBF
    J Oral Implantol; 2019 Oct; 45(5):343-350. PubMed ID: 31429636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of Offset Implant Placement on the Stress Distribution Around a Dental Implant: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Siadat H; Hashemzadeh S; Geramy A; Bassir SH; Alikhasi M
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Dec; 41(6):646-51. PubMed ID: 24666333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Biomechanical Behaviors of Implants with Different Connections, Lengths, and Diameters Placed in the Maxillary Anterior Region.
    Borie E; Orsi IA; Noritomi PY; Kemmoku DT
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 26478969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Biomechanical analysis of 4 types of short dental implants in a resorbed mandible.
    Lee H; Park S; Noh G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Apr; 121(4):659-670. PubMed ID: 30580986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Finite Element Analysis of the Stress Distribution Associated With Different Implant Designs for Different Bone Densities.
    Leblebicioğlu Kurtuluş I; Kilic K; Bal B; Kilavuz A
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Aug; 31(7):614-622. PubMed ID: 35603892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.