These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34099178)

  • 1. Probing ion channel macromolecular interactions using fluorescence resonance energy transfer.
    Rivas S; Hanif K; Chakouri N; Ben-Johny M
    Methods Enzymol; 2021; 653():319-347. PubMed ID: 34099178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer-based stoichiometry in living cells.
    Hoppe A; Christensen K; Swanson JA
    Biophys J; 2002 Dec; 83(6):3652-64. PubMed ID: 12496132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Flow cytometric measurement of fluorescence (Förster) resonance energy transfer from cyan fluorescent protein to yellow fluorescent protein using single-laser excitation at 458 nm.
    He L; Bradrick TD; Karpova TS; Wu X; Fox MH; Fischer R; McNally JG; Knutson JR; Grammer AC; Lipsky PE
    Cytometry A; 2003 May; 53(1):39-54. PubMed ID: 12701131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anomalous surplus energy transfer observed with multiple FRET acceptors.
    Koushik SV; Blank PS; Vogel SS
    PLoS One; 2009 Nov; 4(11):e8031. PubMed ID: 19946626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A flow cytometric method to detect protein-protein interaction in living cells by directly visualizing donor fluorophore quenching during CFP-->YFP fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET).
    He L; Olson DP; Wu X; Karpova TS; McNally JG; Lipsky PE
    Cytometry A; 2003 Oct; 55(2):71-85. PubMed ID: 14505312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optical methods in the study of protein-protein interactions.
    Masi A; Cicchi R; Carloni A; Pavone FS; Arcangeli A
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2010; 674():33-42. PubMed ID: 20549938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Superior robustness of ExEm-spFRET to IIem-spFRET method in live-cell FRET measurement.
    Lin F; Zhang C; Du M; Wang L; Mai Z; Chen T
    J Microsc; 2018 Nov; 272(2):145-150. PubMed ID: 30338530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detecting stoichiometry of macromolecular complexes in live cells using FRET.
    Ben-Johny M; Yue DN; Yue DT
    Nat Commun; 2016 Dec; 7():13709. PubMed ID: 27922011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantifying macromolecular interactions in living cells using FRET two-hybrid assays.
    Butz ES; Ben-Johny M; Shen M; Yang PS; Sang L; Biel M; Yue DT; Wahl-Schott C
    Nat Protoc; 2016 Dec; 11(12):2470-2498. PubMed ID: 27831569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving the spectral analysis of Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer in live cells: application to interferon receptors and Janus kinases.
    Krause CD; Digioia G; Izotova LS; Pestka S
    Cytokine; 2013 Oct; 64(1):272-85. PubMed ID: 23796694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using structure-function constraints in FRET studies of large macromolecular complexes.
    Bujalowski WM; Jezewska MJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 875():135-64. PubMed ID: 22573439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A quantitative protocol for intensity-based live cell FRET imaging.
    Kaminski CF; Rees EJ; Schierle GS
    Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1076():445-54. PubMed ID: 24108638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. FRET-based analysis of TRPC subunit stoichiometry.
    Amiri H; Schultz G; Schaefer M
    Cell Calcium; 2003; 33(5-6):463-70. PubMed ID: 12765691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer of GFP and YFP by spectral imaging and quantitative acceptor photobleaching.
    Dinant C; van Royen ME; Vermeulen W; Houtsmuller AB
    J Microsc; 2008 Jul; 231(Pt 1):97-104. PubMed ID: 18638193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitative intensity-based FRET approaches--a comparative snapshot.
    Zeug A; Woehler A; Neher E; Ponimaskin EG
    Biophys J; 2012 Nov; 103(9):1821-7. PubMed ID: 23199910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A simulation study on the influence of energy migration and relative interaction strengths of homo- and hetero-FRET on the net FRET efficiency.
    Rout J; Swain BC; Sakshi ; Biswas S; Das AK; Tripathy U
    Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc; 2020 Feb; 226():117599. PubMed ID: 31751800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Applying spectral fingerprinting to the analysis of FRET images.
    Neher RA; Neher E
    Microsc Res Tech; 2004 Jun; 64(2):185-95. PubMed ID: 15352090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Confocal microscopic dual-laser dual-polarization FRET (2polFRET) at the acceptor side for correlating rotations at different distances on the cell surface.
    Bene L; Gralle M; Damjanovich L
    Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj; 2018 Apr; 1862(4):1050-1068. PubMed ID: 29292190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating the distance separating fluorescent protein FRET pairs.
    Vogel SS; van der Meer BW; Blank PS
    Methods; 2014 Mar; 66(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 23811334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative comparison of different fluorescent protein couples for fast FRET-FLIM acquisition.
    Padilla-Parra S; Audugé N; Lalucque H; Mevel JC; Coppey-Moisan M; Tramier M
    Biophys J; 2009 Oct; 97(8):2368-76. PubMed ID: 19843469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.