These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34100158)
1. Evaluation of the accuracy of orthodontic models prototyped with entry-level LCD-based 3D printers: a study using surface-based superimposition and deviation analysis. Lo Giudice A; Ronsivalle V; Rustico L; Aboulazm K; Isola G; Palazzo G Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jan; 26(1):303-312. PubMed ID: 34100158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of orthodontic models prototyped for clear aligners therapy: A 3D imaging analysis comparing different market segments 3D printing protocols. Venezia P; Ronsivalle V; Rustico L; Barbato E; Leonardi R; Lo Giudice A J Dent; 2022 Sep; 124():104212. PubMed ID: 35792192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of 3D printed orthodontic models finalized to clear aligners production, testing crowded and spaced dentition. Grassia V; Ronsivalle V; Isola G; Nucci L; Leonardi R; Lo Giudice A BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jun; 23(1):352. PubMed ID: 37268910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing the accuracy of 3 different liquid crystal display printers for dental model printing. Tsolakis IA; Lyros I; Christopoulou I; Tsolakis AI; Papadopoulos MA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2024 Jul; 166(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 38647515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison in Terms of Accuracy between DLP and LCD Printing Technology for Dental Model Printing. Tsolakis IA; Papaioannou W; Papadopoulou E; Dalampira M; Tsolakis AI Dent J (Basel); 2022 Sep; 10(10):. PubMed ID: 36285991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effects of additive manufacturing technologies and finish line designs on the trueness and dimensional stability of 3D-printed dies. Lai YC; Yang CC; Levon JA; Chu TG; Morton D; Lin WS J Prosthodont; 2023 Jul; 32(6):519-526. PubMed ID: 35962924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of 3D Printed Models Created by Two Technologies of Printers with Different Designs of Model Base. Rungrojwittayakul O; Kan JY; Shiozaki K; Swamidass RS; Goodacre BJ; Goodacre CJ; Lozada JL J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):124-128. PubMed ID: 31498957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of internal design on the accuracy of 3-dimensionally printed casts fabricated by stereolithography and digital light processing technology. Chen Y; Li H; Zhai Z; Nakano T; Ishigaki S J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Sep; 130(3):381.e1-381.e7. PubMed ID: 37482533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy evaluation of complete-arch models manufactured by three different 3D printing technologies: a three-dimensional analysis. Emir F; Ayyildiz S J Prosthodont Res; 2021 Aug; 65(3):365-370. PubMed ID: 33177305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of commercial 3D printers for the fabrication of surgical guides in dental implantology. Rouzé l'Alzit F; Cade R; Naveau A; Babilotte J; Meglioli M; Catros S J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103909. PubMed ID: 34852291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dimensional accuracy and surface characteristics of complete-arch cast manufactured by six 3D printers. Sim MY; Park JB; Kim DY; Kim HY; Park JM Heliyon; 2024 May; 10(10):e30996. PubMed ID: 38778963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dimensional Accuracy Evaluation of Temporary Dental Restorations with Different 3D Printing Systems. Moon W; Kim S; Lim BS; Park YS; Kim RJ; Chung SH Materials (Basel); 2021 Mar; 14(6):. PubMed ID: 33803596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of 3-dimensional printing technologies on the precision, trueness, and accuracy of printed retainers. Naeem OA; Bencharit S; Yang IH; Stilianoudakis SC; Carrico C; Tüfekçi E Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Apr; 161(4):582-591. PubMed ID: 35337648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Error analysis of stages involved in CBCT-guided implant placement with surgical guides when different printing technologies are used. Yeager B; Çakmak G; Zheng F; Johnston WM; Yilmaz B J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Nov; 132(5):995-1004. PubMed ID: 36690552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of five different 3D printing workflows for dental models comparing industrial and dental desktop printers. Morón-Conejo B; López-Vilagran J; Cáceres D; Berrendero S; Pradíes G Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jun; 27(6):2521-2532. PubMed ID: 36462040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Trueness of five different 3D printing systems including budget- and professional-grade printers: An In vitro study. Palaszkó D; Németh A; Török G; Vecsei B; Vánkos B; Dinya E; Borbély J; Marada G; Hermann P; Kispélyi B Heliyon; 2024 Mar; 10(5):e26874. PubMed ID: 38468926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of print layer height and printer type on the accuracy of 3-dimensional printed orthodontic models. Favero CS; English JD; Cozad BE; Wirthlin JO; Short MM; Kasper FK Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Oct; 152(4):557-565. PubMed ID: 28962741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Evaluation of the Trueness of Dental Mastercasts Obtained through Different 3D Printing Technologies. Ciocan LT; Vasilescu VG; Pantea M; Pițuru SM; Imre M; Ripszky Totan A; Froimovici FO J Funct Biomater; 2024 Jul; 15(8):. PubMed ID: 39194648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of 6 Desktop 3D Printers in Dentistry: A Comparative In Vitro Study. Mangano FG; Admakin O; Bonacina M; Biaggini F; Farronato D; Lerner H Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2020 May; 28(2):75-85. PubMed ID: 32347671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]