These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34100158)

  • 1. Evaluation of the accuracy of orthodontic models prototyped with entry-level LCD-based 3D printers: a study using surface-based superimposition and deviation analysis.
    Lo Giudice A; Ronsivalle V; Rustico L; Aboulazm K; Isola G; Palazzo G
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jan; 26(1):303-312. PubMed ID: 34100158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of orthodontic models prototyped for clear aligners therapy: A 3D imaging analysis comparing different market segments 3D printing protocols.
    Venezia P; Ronsivalle V; Rustico L; Barbato E; Leonardi R; Lo Giudice A
    J Dent; 2022 Sep; 124():104212. PubMed ID: 35792192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison in Terms of Accuracy between DLP and LCD Printing Technology for Dental Model Printing.
    Tsolakis IA; Papaioannou W; Papadopoulou E; Dalampira M; Tsolakis AI
    Dent J (Basel); 2022 Sep; 10(10):. PubMed ID: 36285991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of 3D Printed Models Created by Two Technologies of Printers with Different Designs of Model Base.
    Rungrojwittayakul O; Kan JY; Shiozaki K; Swamidass RS; Goodacre BJ; Goodacre CJ; Lozada JL
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):124-128. PubMed ID: 31498957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy evaluation of complete-arch models manufactured by three different 3D printing technologies: a three-dimensional analysis.
    Emir F; Ayyildiz S
    J Prosthodont Res; 2021 Aug; 65(3):365-370. PubMed ID: 33177305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dimensional Accuracy Evaluation of Temporary Dental Restorations with Different 3D Printing Systems.
    Moon W; Kim S; Lim BS; Park YS; Kim RJ; Chung SH
    Materials (Basel); 2021 Mar; 14(6):. PubMed ID: 33803596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of commercial 3D printers for the fabrication of surgical guides in dental implantology.
    Rouzé l'Alzit F; Cade R; Naveau A; Babilotte J; Meglioli M; Catros S
    J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103909. PubMed ID: 34852291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of 3-dimensional printing technologies on the precision, trueness, and accuracy of printed retainers.
    Naeem OA; Bencharit S; Yang IH; Stilianoudakis SC; Carrico C; Tüfekçi E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Apr; 161(4):582-591. PubMed ID: 35337648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Error analysis of stages involved in CBCT-guided implant placement with surgical guides when different printing technologies are used.
    Yeager B; Çakmak G; Zheng F; Johnston WM; Yilmaz B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 36690552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of additive manufacturing technologies and finish line designs on the trueness and dimensional stability of 3D-printed dies.
    Lai YC; Yang CC; Levon JA; Chu TG; Morton D; Lin WS
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Jul; 32(6):519-526. PubMed ID: 35962924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of print layer height and printer type on the accuracy of 3-dimensional printed orthodontic models.
    Favero CS; English JD; Cozad BE; Wirthlin JO; Short MM; Kasper FK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Oct; 152(4):557-565. PubMed ID: 28962741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of 6 Desktop 3D Printers in Dentistry: A Comparative In Vitro Study.
    Mangano FG; Admakin O; Bonacina M; Biaggini F; Farronato D; Lerner H
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2020 May; 28(2):75-85. PubMed ID: 32347671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the accuracy of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) generated tooth replicas with application in autotransplantation.
    Lee CKJ; Foong KWC; Sim YF; Chew MT
    J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103908. PubMed ID: 34856326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy, reproducibility, and dimensional stability of additively manufactured surgical templates.
    Chen L; Lin WS; Polido WD; Eckert GJ; Morton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Sep; 122(3):309-314. PubMed ID: 30948293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dimensional accuracy of extrusion- and photopolymerization-based 3D printers: In vitro study comparing printed casts.
    Nestler N; Wesemann C; Spies BC; Beuer F; Bumann A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jan; 125(1):103-110. PubMed ID: 32063385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of the three-dimensional printing technique and printing layer thickness on model accuracy.
    Zhang ZC; Li PL; Chu FT; Shen G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2019 Jul; 80(4):194-204. PubMed ID: 31172199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of flexural properties and cytotoxicity of interim materials printed from mono-LCD and DLP 3D printers.
    Chen H; Cheng DH; Huang SC; Lin YM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Nov; 126(5):703-708. PubMed ID: 33041074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro accuracies of 3D printed models manufactured by two different printing technologies.
    Emir F; Ceylan G; Ayyildiz S
    Eur Oral Res; 2021 May; 55(2):80-85. PubMed ID: 34250474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Trueness of Obturator Prosthesis Base Manufactured by Conventional and 3D Printing Techniques.
    Alfaraj A; Yang CC; Levon JA; Chu TG; Morton D; Lin WS
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Mar; 31(3):221-227. PubMed ID: 34048118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of trueness and precision of 12 3D printers used in dentistry.
    Nulty A
    BDJ Open; 2022 May; 8(1):14. PubMed ID: 35618716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.