These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34100409)

  • 21. Ethical issues in studying submissions to a medical journal.
    Olson CM; Glass RM; Thacker SB; Stroup DF
    JAMA; 1998 Jul; 280(3):290-1. PubMed ID: 9676686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Blind versus nonblind review: survey of selected medical journals.
    Cleary JD; Alexander B
    Drug Intell Clin Pharm; 1988; 22(7-8):601-2. PubMed ID: 3416750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Predictors of publication: characteristics of submitted manuscripts associated with acceptance at major biomedical journals.
    Lee KP; Boyd EA; Holroyd-Leduc JM; Bacchetti P; Bero LA
    Med J Aust; 2006 Jun; 184(12):621-6. PubMed ID: 16803442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Journal response types and times: the outcomes of manuscripts finalised for submission by the University of the Free State School of Medicine medical editor, South Africa.
    Joubert G; Mulder T; Steinberg WJ; Botes J
    Pan Afr Med J; 2020; 36():212. PubMed ID: 32963678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Quality of scientific articles.
    Szklo M
    Rev Saude Publica; 2006 Aug; 40 Spec no.():30-5. PubMed ID: 16924300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [The percentage of articles which were accepted or rejected for publication in the Dutch Journal of Medicine in 1997].
    Bloemenkamp DG; Hart W; Overbeke AJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Jan; 143(3):157-9. PubMed ID: 10086132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Magazine or journal--what is the difference? The role of the monitoring editor.
    Bretscher A
    Mol Biol Cell; 2013 Apr; 24(7):887-9. PubMed ID: 23533210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A survey of orthopaedic journal editors determining the criteria of manuscript selection for publication.
    Hing CB; Higgs D; Hooper L; Donell ST; Song F
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2011 Apr; 6():19. PubMed ID: 21527007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Characteristics and fate of orthodontic articles submitted for publication: An exploratory study of the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics.
    Farjo N; Turpin DL; Coley RY; Feng J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jun; 147(6):680-90. PubMed ID: 26038071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Analysis of the Revision Process by American Journal of Roentgenology Reviewers and Section Editors: Metrics of Rejected Manuscripts and Their Final Disposition.
    Cejas C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jun; 208(6):1181-1184. PubMed ID: 28350482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Trend and characteristics of manuscripts received and rejected in the Peruvian Journal of Experimental Medicine and Public Health between 2011 and 2017].
    Arroyo-Hernández H; Huarez B
    Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica; 2019; 36(2):281-287. PubMed ID: 31460642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Why Do Manuscripts Get Rejected? A Content Analysis of Rejection Reports from the Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine.
    Menon V; Varadharajan N; Praharaj SK; Ameen S
    Indian J Psychol Med; 2022 Jan; 44(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 35509668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Peer review for biomedical publications: we can improve the system.
    Stahel PF; Moore EE
    BMC Med; 2014 Sep; 12():179. PubMed ID: 25270270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Editorial situation of seven Latin American journals on respiratory diseases].
    Oyarzún G M; Ramírez V A; Agüero F A; Baddini-Martínez JA; Bermúdez G M; Canevá JO; Morales JE; Pérez-Padilla R
    Rev Med Chil; 2007 Aug; 135(8):1072-5. PubMed ID: 17989867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. How do reviewers affect the final outcome? Comparison of the quality of peer review and relative acceptance rates of submitted manuscripts.
    Kurihara Y; Colletti PM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Sep; 201(3):468-70. PubMed ID: 23971437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [New review of uniformity requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: pay attention to ethics!].
    Pulido M
    Med Clin (Barc); 2004 May; 122(17):661-3. PubMed ID: 15153346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Your role and responsibilities in the manuscript peer review process.
    Brazeau GA; Dipiro JT; Fincham JE; Boucher BA; Tracy TS
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2008 Jun; 72(3):69. PubMed ID: 18698392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: 2017/2018 in review.
    Manning WJ
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2019 Dec; 21(1):79. PubMed ID: 31884956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Acceptance rate and reasons for rejection of manuscripts submitted to Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound during 2012.
    Lamb CR; Mai W
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2015; 56(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 24798652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping.
    Siler K; Lee K; Bero L
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Jan; 112(2):360-5. PubMed ID: 25535380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.