206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34100650)
1. Freehand versus Grid-Based Transperineal Prostate Biopsy: A Comparison of Anatomical Region Yield and Complications.
Urkmez A; Demirel C; Altok M; Bathala TK; Shapiro DD; Davis JW
J Urol; 2021 Oct; 206(4):894-902. PubMed ID: 34100650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patient Reported Outcome Measures for Transperineal Template Prostate Mapping Biopsies in the PICTURE Study.
Miah S; Eldred-Evans D; Simmons LAM; Shah TT; Kanthabalan A; Arya M; Winkler M; McCartan N; Freeman A; Punwani S; Moore CM; Emberton M; Ahmed HU
J Urol; 2018 Dec; 200(6):1235-1240. PubMed ID: 29940251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pain in Men Undergoing Transperineal Free-Hand Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Targeted Biopsies under Local Anesthesia: Outcomes and Predictors from a Multicenter Study of 1,008 Patients.
Marra G; Zhuang J; Marquis A; Zhao X; Calleris G; Kan Y; Oderda M; Huang H; Faletti R; Zhang Q; Molinaro L; Wang W; Bergamasco L; Guo H; Gontero P
J Urol; 2020 Dec; 204(6):1209-1215. PubMed ID: 32628099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How Many Targeted Biopsy Cores are Needed for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection during Transperineal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy?
Song G; Ruan M; Wang H; Fan Y; He Q; Lin Z; Li X; Li P; Wang X; He Z; Zhou L
J Urol; 2020 Dec; 204(6):1202-1208. PubMed ID: 32716686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transperineal freehand multiparametric MRI fusion targeted biopsies under local anaesthesia for prostate cancer diagnosis: a multicentre prospective study of 1014 cases.
Marra G; Zhuang J; Beltrami M; Calleris G; Zhao X; Marquis A; Kan Y; Oderda M; Huang H; Faletti R; Zhang Q; Molinaro L; Wang W; Bergamasco L; Guo H; Gontero P
BJU Int; 2021 Jan; 127(1):122-130. PubMed ID: 32455504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Initial Experience Performing In-office Ultrasound-guided Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Under Local Anesthesia Using the PrecisionPoint Transperineal Access System.
Meyer AR; Joice GA; Schwen ZR; Partin AW; Allaf ME; Gorin MA
Urology; 2018 May; 115():8-13. PubMed ID: 29409845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transperineal Versus Transrectal Targeted Biopsy With Use of Electromagnetically-tracked MR/US Fusion Guidance Platform for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Winoker JS; Wajswol E; Falagario U; Maritini A; Moshier E; Voutsinas N; Knauer CJ; Sfakianos JP; Lewis SC; Taouli BA; Rastinehad AR
Urology; 2020 Dec; 146():278-286. PubMed ID: 32956688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative analysis of transperineal template saturation prostate biopsy versus magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy with magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion guidance.
Radtke JP; Kuru TH; Boxler S; Alt CD; Popeneciu IV; Huettenbrink C; Klein T; Steinemann S; Bergstraesser C; Roethke M; Roth W; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
J Urol; 2015 Jan; 193(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 25079939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transperineal magnetic resonance image targeted prostate biopsy versus transperineal template prostate biopsy in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
Kasivisvanathan V; Dufour R; Moore CM; Ahmed HU; Abd-Alazeez M; Charman SC; Freeman A; Allen C; Kirkham A; van der Meulen J; Emberton M
J Urol; 2013 Mar; 189(3):860-6. PubMed ID: 23063807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of real-time magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion image-guided transperineal target biopsy with needle tracking with a mechanical position-encoded stepper in detecting significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve men.
Shoji S; Hiraiwa S; Ogawa T; Kawakami M; Nakano M; Hashida K; Sato Y; Hasebe T; Uchida T; Tajiri T
Int J Urol; 2017 Apr; 24(4):288-294. PubMed ID: 28222486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 3T MR-guided in-bore transperineal prostate biopsy: A comparison of robotic and manual needle-guidance templates.
Tilak G; Tuncali K; Song SE; Tokuda J; Olubiyi O; Fennessy F; Fedorov A; Penzkofer T; Tempany C; Hata N
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Jul; 42(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 25263213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of free-hand transperineal mpMRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy with transperineal 12-core systematic biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a single-center prospective study in China.
Zhang Q; Wang W; Zhang B; Shi J; Fu Y; Li D; Guo S; Zhang S; Huang H; Jiang X; Zhou W; Guo H
Int Urol Nephrol; 2017 Mar; 49(3):439-448. PubMed ID: 28005230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Systematic and MRI-Cognitive Targeted Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Accuracy in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer after Previous Negative Biopsy and Persisting Suspicion of Malignancy.
Vėželis A; Platkevičius G; Kinčius M; Gumbys L; Naruševičiūtė I; Briedienė R; Petroška D; Ulys A; Jankevičius F
Medicina (Kaunas); 2021 Jan; 57(1):. PubMed ID: 33435132
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic Accuracy of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Fusion Guided Targeted Biopsy Evaluated by Transperineal Template Saturation Prostate Biopsy for the Detection and Characterization of Prostate Cancer.
Mortezavi A; Märzendorfer O; Donati OF; Rizzi G; Rupp NJ; Wettstein MS; Gross O; Sulser T; Hermanns T; Eberli D
J Urol; 2018 Aug; 200(2):309-318. PubMed ID: 29474846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Targeted MRI-guided prostate biopsy: are two biopsy cores per MRI-lesion required?
Schimmöller L; Quentin M; Blondin D; Dietzel F; Hiester A; Schleich C; Thomas C; Rabenalt R; Gabbert HE; Albers P; Antoch G; Arsov C
Eur Radiol; 2016 Nov; 26(11):3858-3864. PubMed ID: 26920391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer in magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography-fusion transperineal targeted biopsy for lesions with a prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 score of 3-5.
Hakozaki Y; Matsushima H; Murata T; Masuda T; Hirai Y; Oda M; Kawauchi N; Yokoyama M; Kume H
Int J Urol; 2019 Feb; 26(2):217-222. PubMed ID: 30461076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Single Center Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging against Transperineal Prostate Mapping Biopsy: An Analysis of Men with Benign Histology and Insignificant Cancer following Transrectal Ultrasound Biopsy.
Pal RP; Ahmad R; Trecartan S; Voss J; Ahmed S; Bazo A; Lloyd J; Walton TJ
J Urol; 2018 Aug; 200(2):302-308. PubMed ID: 29477717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prostate Mapping for Cancer Diagnosis: The Madrid Protocol. Transperineal Prostate Biopsies Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion and Micro-Ultrasound Guided Biopsies.
Rodríguez Socarrás ME; Gomez Rivas J; Cuadros Rivera V; Reinoso Elbers J; Llanes González L; Michel Mercado I; Fernandez Del Alamo J; Juarez Del Dago P; Sancha FG
J Urol; 2020 Oct; 204(4):726-733. PubMed ID: 32314932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sectoral cancer detection and tolerability of freehand transperineal prostate biopsy under local anaesthesia.
Chiu PK; Lo KL; Teoh JY; Ma SF; Leung CH; Wong HF; Li KM; Sae-Lo K; Kwok SW; Li SY; Yee CH; Hou SM; Ng CF
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2021 Jun; 24(2):431-438. PubMed ID: 32999465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Xiang J; Yan H; Li J; Wang X; Chen H; Zheng X
World J Surg Oncol; 2019 Feb; 17(1):31. PubMed ID: 30760274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
