200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34100650)
21. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy-Are 2 Biopsy Cores per Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lesion Required?
Dimitroulis P; Rabenalt R; Nini A; Hiester A; Esposito I; Schimmöller L; Antoch G; Albers P; Arsov C
J Urol; 2018 Nov; 200(5):1030-1034. PubMed ID: 29733837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparative Effectiveness and Tolerability of Transperineal MRI-Targeted Prostate Biopsy under Local versus Sedation.
Cricco-Lizza E; Wilcox Vanden Berg RN; Laviana A; Pantuck M; Basourakos SP; Salami SS; Hung AJ; Margolis DJ; Hu JC; McClure TD
Urology; 2021 Sep; 155():33-38. PubMed ID: 34217762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Transperineal in-bore 3-T MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy: a prospective clinical observational study.
Penzkofer T; Tuncali K; Fedorov A; Song SE; Tokuda J; Fennessy FM; Vangel MG; Kibel AS; Mulkern RV; Wells WM; Hata N; Tempany CM
Radiology; 2015 Jan; 274(1):170-80. PubMed ID: 25222067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. How Many Cores Should be Obtained During Saturation Biopsy in the Era of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance? Experience in 875 Patients Submitted to Repeat Prostate Biopsy.
Pepe P; Pennisi M; Fraggetta F
Urology; 2020 Mar; 137():133-137. PubMed ID: 31758981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Feasibility of freehand MRI/US cognitive fusion transperineal biopsy of the prostate in local anaesthesia as in-office procedure-experience with 400 patients.
Wetterauer C; Shahin O; Federer-Gsponer JR; Keller N; Wyler S; Seifert HH; Kwiatkowski M
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2020 Sep; 23(3):429-434. PubMed ID: 31896767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Transperineal template-guided saturation biopsy aimed at sampling one core for each milliliter of prostate volume: 103 cases requiring repeat prostate biopsy.
Nakai Y; Tanaka N; Anai S; Miyake M; Hori S; Tatsumi Y; Morizawa Y; Fujii T; Konishi N; Fujimoto K
BMC Urol; 2017 Apr; 17(1):28. PubMed ID: 28381267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. MRI-guided core needle biopsy of the prostate: acceptance and side effects.
Egbers N; Schwenke C; Maxeiner A; Teichgräber U; Franiel T
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2015; 21(3):215-21. PubMed ID: 25858525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Does the Visibility of Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer on Baseline Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Impact Clinical Outcomes?
Deniffel D; Salinas E; Ientilucci M; Evans AJ; Fleshner N; Ghai S; Hamilton R; Roberts A; Toi A; van der Kwast T; Zlotta A; Finelli A; Haider MA; Perlis N
J Urol; 2020 Dec; 204(6):1187-1194. PubMed ID: 32496160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Clinical utility of transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy of the prostate after negative magnetic resonance imaging-guided transrectal biopsy.
Sivaraman A; Sanchez-Salas R; Ahmed HU; Barret E; Cathala N; Mombet A; Uriburu Pizarro F; Carneiro A; Doizi S; Galiano M; Rozet F; Prapotnich D; Cathelineau X
Urol Oncol; 2015 Jul; 33(7):329.e7-11. PubMed ID: 25957713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. "In-bore" MRI-guided Prostate Biopsy Using an Endorectal Nonmagnetic Device: A Prospective Study of 70 Consecutive Patients.
Schiavina R; Vagnoni V; D'Agostino D; Borghesi M; Salvaggio A; Giampaoli M; Pultrone CV; Saraceni G; Gaudiano C; Vigo M; Bianchi L; Dababneh H; La Manna G; Chessa F; Romagnoli D; Martorana G; Brunocilla E; Porreca A
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2017 Jun; 15(3):417-427. PubMed ID: 28258961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Surface-projection-based transperineal cognitive fusion targeted biopsy of the prostate: an original technique with a good cancer detection rate.
Wang L; Wang X; Zhao W; Zhao Z; Li Z; Fei S; Zhu H; Ji X; Yang B; Li N; Na Y
BMC Urol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):107. PubMed ID: 31684917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Optimizing the Number of Cores Targeted During Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Target Biopsy.
Kenigsberg AP; Renson A; Rosenkrantz AB; Huang R; Wysock JS; Taneja SS; Bjurlin MA
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Oct; 1(5):418-425. PubMed ID: 31158081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Prostate biopsy: results and advantages of the transperineal approach--twenty-year experience of a single center.
Pepe P; Aragona F
World J Urol; 2014 Apr; 32(2):373-7. PubMed ID: 23743734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A cohort of transperineal electromagnetically tracked magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion-guided biopsy: assessing the impact of inter-reader variability on cancer detection.
Wajswol E; Winoker JS; Anastos H; Falagario U; Okhawere K; Martini A; Treacy PJ; Voutsinas N; Knauer CJ; Sfakianos JP; Lewis SC; Taouli BA; Rastinehad AR
BJU Int; 2020 Apr; 125(4):531-540. PubMed ID: 31762182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Initial outcomes of local anaesthetic freehand transperineal prostate biopsies in the outpatient setting.
Kum F; Elhage O; Maliyil J; Wong K; Faure Walker N; Kulkarni M; Namdarian B; Challacombe B; Cathcart P; Popert R
BJU Int; 2020 Feb; 125(2):244-252. PubMed ID: 30431694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Initial series of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-fusion targeted prostate biopsy using the first transperineal targeted platform available in the USA.
Kosarek CD; Mahmoud AM; Eyzaguirre EJ; Shan Y; Walser EM; Horn GL; Williams SB
BJU Int; 2018 Nov; 122(5):909-912. PubMed ID: 29569311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. MRI/US fusion-guided prostate biopsy allows for equivalent cancer detection with significantly fewer needle cores in biopsy-naive men.
Yarlagadda VK; Lai WS; Gordetsky JB; Porter KK; Nix JW; Thomas JV; Rais-Bahrami S
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2018; 24(3):115-120. PubMed ID: 29770762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Developments in optimizing transperineal prostate biopsy.
Cheng E; Davuluri M; Lewicki PJ; Hu JC; Basourakos SP
Curr Opin Urol; 2022 Jan; 32(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 34783715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of patient comfort between MR-guided in-bore and MRI/ultrasound fusion-guided prostate biopsies within a prospective randomized trial.
Arsov C; Rabenalt R; Quentin M; Hiester A; Blondin D; Albers P; Antoch G; Schimmöller L
World J Urol; 2016 Feb; 34(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 26055645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparing Three Different Techniques for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsies: A Systematic Review of In-bore versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging-transrectal Ultrasound fusion versus Cognitive Registration. Is There a Preferred Technique?
Wegelin O; van Melick HHE; Hooft L; Bosch JLHR; Reitsma HB; Barentsz JO; Somford DM
Eur Urol; 2017 Apr; 71(4):517-531. PubMed ID: 27568655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
