282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34100818)
1. Safety Profile and Predictors of Aesthetic Outcomes After Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction With Meshed Acellular Dermal Matrix.
Belmonte BM; Campbell CA
Ann Plast Surg; 2021 Jun; 86(6S Suppl 5):S585-S592. PubMed ID: 34100818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Outcomes after tissue expander exchange to implant in two-stage prepectoral breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix: A retrospective cohort study.
Marquez JL; French M; Ormiston L; Pires G; Martheswaran T; Eddington D; Tuncer F; Agarwal JP; Kwok AC
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2024 Feb; 89():97-104. PubMed ID: 38160591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Early Functional Outcomes After Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Case-Matched Cohort Study.
Schaeffer CV; Dassoulas KR; Thuman J; Campbell CA
Ann Plast Surg; 2019 Jun; 82(6S Suppl 5):S399-S403. PubMed ID: 30570559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Aesthetic Limitations in Direct-to-Implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.
Safran T; Al-Badarin F; Al-Halabi B; Viezel-Mathieu A; Dionisopoulos T
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Jul; 150(1):22e-31e. PubMed ID: 35499675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction Without the Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix: A 3-Year Review.
Poveromo LP; Franck P; Ellison A; Janhofer DE; Asadourian PA; Otterburn DM
Ann Plast Surg; 2022 May; 88(3 Suppl 3):S205-S208. PubMed ID: 35513321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Comparison of Dermal Autograft and Acellular Dermal Matrix in Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: Long-term Aesthetic Outcomes and Capsular Contracture.
Lynch MP; Chung MT; Rinker BD
Ann Plast Surg; 2015 Jun; 74 Suppl 4():S214-7. PubMed ID: 25389715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. ADMs and synthetic meshes improve implant-based breast reconstruction aesthetics, but at what cost?
Samaha Y; Chen J; Ray EC
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 May; 80():178-181. PubMed ID: 37028245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. BROWSE: A multicentre comparison of nine year outcomes in acellular dermal matrix based and complete submuscular implant-based immediate breast reconstruction-aesthetics, capsular contracture and patient reported outcomes.
Wilson RL; Kirwan CC; O'Donoghue JM; Linforth RA; Johnson RK; Harvey JR
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Jan; 48(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 34836730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. When to Consider Prepectoral Implant Conversion After Subpectoral Implant Breast Reconstruction and How to Plan It.
Salgarello M; Barone Adesi L; Macrì G; Visconti G
Aesthet Surg J; 2023 Nov; 43(12):NP1071-NP1077. PubMed ID: 37668406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reducing Expansion Visits in Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of Prepectoral and Subpectoral Expander Placement.
Wormer BA; Valmadrid AC; Ganesh Kumar N; Al Kassis S; Rankin TM; Kaoutzanis C; Higdon KK
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Aug; 144(2):276-286. PubMed ID: 31348326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Postoperative Complications Following Prepectoral Versus Partial Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using ADM: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Zhu L; Liu C
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2023 Aug; 47(4):1260-1273. PubMed ID: 36947180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Do we need acellular dermal matrix in prepectoral breast reconstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Nolan IT; Farajzadeh MM; Boyd CJ; Bekisz JM; Gibson EG; Salibian AA
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 Nov; 86():251-260. PubMed ID: 37793198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Early Complications after Prepectoral Tissue Expander Placement in Breast Reconstruction with and without Acellular Dermal Matrix.
Pires G; Marquez JL; Memmott S; Sudduth JD; Moss W; Eddington D; Hobson G; Tuncer F; Agarwal JP; Kwok AC
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2024 Jun; 153(6):1221-1229. PubMed ID: 37285211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Acellular Dermal Matrix-sparing Direct-to-implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study Including Cost Analysis.
Viezel-Mathieu A; Alnaif N; Aljerian A; Safran T; Brabant G; Boileau JF; Dionisopoulos T
Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Feb; 84(2):139-143. PubMed ID: 31335468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Impact of Premastectomy Versus Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy on Outcomes in Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.
Sinnott CJ; Pronovost MT; Persing SM; Wu R; Young AO
Ann Plast Surg; 2021 Jul; 87(1s Suppl 1):S21-S27. PubMed ID: 33833185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Options in Acellular Dermal Matrix-Device Assembly.
Sigalove S
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Dec; 140(6S Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction):39S-42S. PubMed ID: 29166346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Staged Suprapectoral Expander/Implant Reconstruction without Acellular Dermal Matrix following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.
Salibian AH; Harness JK; Mowlds DS
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Jan; 139(1):30-39. PubMed ID: 28027223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality of Life and Early Functional Evaluation in Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy: A Comparative Study Between Prepectoral Versus Dual-Plane Reconstruction.
Caputo GG; Zingaretti N; Kiprianidis I; Zanfisi C; Domenici L; Parodi PC; Governa M
Clin Breast Cancer; 2021 Aug; 21(4):344-351. PubMed ID: 33308993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Inhibition Mechanism of Acellular Dermal Matrix on Capsule Formation in Expander-Implant Breast Reconstruction After Postmastectomy Radiotherapy.
Kim IK; Park SO; Chang H; Jin US
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Aug; 25(8):2279-2287. PubMed ID: 29855829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with porcine acellular dermal matrix: a new technique for direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy.
Reitsamer R; Peintinger F
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Feb; 68(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 25455288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
