142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34100975)
1. Absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for vaginal mesh attachment during sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial.
Reisenauer C; Andress J; Schoenfisch B; Huebner M; Brucker SY; Lippkowski A; Beilecke K; Marschke J; Tunn R
Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Feb; 33(2):411-419. PubMed ID: 34100975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Anchor vs suture for the attachment of vaginal mesh in a robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a randomized clinical trial.
Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):258.e1-258.e8. PubMed ID: 32413431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Permanent Compared With Absorbable Suture for Vaginal Mesh Fixation During Total Hysterectomy and Sacrocolpopexy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Matthews CA; Geller EJ; Henley BR; Kenton K; Myers EM; Dieter AA; Parnell B; Lewicky-Gaupp C; Mueller MG; Wu JM
Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 136(2):355-364. PubMed ID: 32649494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. RCT of vaginal extraperitoneal uterosacral ligament suspension (VEULS) with anterior mesh versus sacrocolpopexy: 4-year outcome.
Ow LL; Lim YN; Lee J; Murray C; Thomas E; Leitch A; Rosamilia A; Dwyer PL
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Nov; 29(11):1607-1614. PubMed ID: 29961110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of absorbable and permanent sutures for laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy: A randomized controlled trial.
Tagliaferri V; Ruggieri S; Taccaliti C; Gentile C; Didonna T; D'asta M; Legge F; Guida P; Scambia G; Guido M
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Feb; 100(2):347-352. PubMed ID: 32970837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal sacrospinous fixation for vaginal vault prolapse: a randomised controlled trial and prospective cohort (SALTO-2 trial).
van Oudheusden AMJ; van IJsselmuiden MN; Menge LF; Coolen AWM; Veen J; van Eijndhoven HWF; Dietz V; Kluivers KB; Spaans WA; Vollebregt A; van de Pol G; Radder CM; van der Ploeg JM; van Kuijk SMJ; Bongers MY
BJOG; 2023 Nov; 130(12):1542-1551. PubMed ID: 37132094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mesh-related complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
Baines G; Price N; Jefferis H; Cartwright R; Jackson SR
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Sep; 30(9):1475-1481. PubMed ID: 31041499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Anatomical outcomes 1 year after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in patients with and without a uterus at a high risk of recurrence: a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy/cervicopexy and anterior vaginal mesh.
Bataller E; Ros C; Anglès S; Gallego M; Espuña-Pons M; Carmona F
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):545-555. PubMed ID: 29987345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A randomized trial of vaginal mesh attachment techniques for minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy.
Tan-Kim J; Nager CW; Grimes CL; Luber KM; Lukacz ES; Brown HW; Ferrante KL; Dyer KY; Kirby AC; Menefee SA
Int Urogynecol J; 2015 May; 26(5):649-56. PubMed ID: 25421934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anatomical Outcomes Based on Suturing Technique During Vaginal Mesh Attachment in Robotic Sacrocolpopexy.
Bazzi AA; Osmundsen BC; Hagglund KH; Aslam MF
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(2):105-108. PubMed ID: 30807409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High uterosacral vault suspension vs Sacrocolpopexy for treating apical defects: a randomized controlled trial with twelve months follow-up.
Rondini C; Braun H; Alvarez J; Urzúa MJ; Villegas R; Wenzel C; Descouvieres C
Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Aug; 26(8):1131-8. PubMed ID: 25910610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Letter to the editor: absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for vaginal mesh attachment during sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial.
Yeh JL; Long CY
Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Jul; 33(7):2069. PubMed ID: 35648183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Partially absorbable mesh or native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse: a randomized controlled trial.
Steures P; Milani AL; van Rumpt-van de Geest DA; Kluivers KB; Withagen MIJ
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):565-573. PubMed ID: 30159720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The use of one-piece U-shaped mesh and barbed sutures in laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
García-Segui A; Lorenzo Soriano L; Costa-Martínez MA; Amorós Torres A; Gilabert A; Oltra MF
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2020; 44(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 31806248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: guidelines for clinical practice].
Wagner L; Meurette G; Vidart A; Warembourg S; Terassa JB; Berrogain N; Ragni E; Le Normand L
Prog Urol; 2016 Jul; 26 Suppl 1():S27-37. PubMed ID: 27595624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does sacrocolpopexy present heterogeneity in its surgical technique? A systematic review.
Moroni RM; Juliato CRT; Cosson M; Giraudet G; Brito LGO
Neurourol Urodyn; 2018 Nov; 37(8):2335-2345. PubMed ID: 30024069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of vaginal mesh repair with sacrospinous vaginal colpopexy in the management of vaginal vault prolapse after hysterectomy in patients with levator ani avulsion: a randomized controlled trial.
Svabik K; Martan A; Masata J; El-Haddad R; Hubka P
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Apr; 43(4):365-71. PubMed ID: 24615948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transvaginal single-port versus multi-port laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a retrospective cohort study.
Li J; Sima Y; Hu C; Wang X; Lu Z; Hua K; Chen Y
BMC Surg; 2022 Mar; 22(1):82. PubMed ID: 35246079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Surgical interventions for uterine prolapse and for vault prolapse: the two VUE RCTs.
Hemming C; Constable L; Goulao B; Kilonzo M; Boyers D; Elders A; Cooper K; Smith A; Freeman R; Breeman S; McDonald A; Hagen S; Montgomery I; Norrie J; Glazener C
Health Technol Assess; 2020 Mar; 24(13):1-220. PubMed ID: 32138809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative study of absorbable suture and permanent suture in sacrocolpopexy: a meta-analysis and systematic review.
Chen S; Liu Y; Peng L; Chen Y; Shen H; Luo D
Int Urogynecol J; 2023 May; 34(5):993-1000. PubMed ID: 36598553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
