These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3410174)

  • 21. The psychosocial impact of hearing aids in children with otitis media with effusion.
    Qureishi A; Garas G; Mallick A; Parker D
    J Laryngol Otol; 2014 Nov; 128(11):972-5. PubMed ID: 25274185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The relationship between pre-fitting expectations and willingness to use hearing aids.
    Meister H; Walger M; Brehmer D; von Wedel UC; von Wedel H
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Apr; 47(4):153-9. PubMed ID: 18389410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Development of APHAB norms for WDRC hearing aids and comparisons with original norms.
    Johnson JA; Cox RM; Alexander GC
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 19692903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Exploring the Effects of the Narrative Embodied in the Hearing Aid Fitting Process on Treatment Outcomes.
    Naylor G; Öberg M; Wänström G; Lunner T
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):517-26. PubMed ID: 25811932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of speech perception between monaural and binaural hearing in cochlear implant patients.
    Iwaki T; Matsushiro N; Mah SR; Sato T; Yasuoka E; Yamamoto K; Kubo T
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2004 May; 124(4):358-62. PubMed ID: 15224853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Hearing aid effect in older females.
    Doggett S; Stein RL; Gans D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1998 Oct; 9(5):361-6. PubMed ID: 9806409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Social Support Predicts Hearing Aid Satisfaction.
    Singh G; Lau ST; Pichora-Fuller MK
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):664-76. PubMed ID: 26035144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Better together: reduced compliance after sequential versus simultaneous bilateral hearing aids fitting.
    Lavie L; Banai K; Attias J; Karni A
    Am J Audiol; 2014 Mar; 23(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 24096862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparison of sound quality judgments for monaural and binaural hearing aid processed stimuli.
    Balfour PB; Hawkins DB
    Ear Hear; 1992 Oct; 13(5):331-9. PubMed ID: 1487093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The advantages and disadvantages of ITC, ITE and BTE hearing aids: diary and interview reports from elderly users.
    May AE; Upfold LJ; Battaglia JA
    Br J Audiol; 1990 Oct; 24(5):301-9. PubMed ID: 2265300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of hearing aids on hearing disability and quality of life in the elderly.
    Vuorialho A; Karinen P; Sorri M
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Jul; 45(7):400-5. PubMed ID: 16938798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effectiveness of an affordable hearing aid with elderly persons.
    McPherson B; Wong ET
    Disabil Rehabil; 2005 Jun; 27(11):601-9. PubMed ID: 16019870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Performance-Perceptual Test (PPT) and its relationship to aided reported handicap and hearing aid satisfaction.
    Saunders GH; Forsline A
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 16672792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of three strategies for fitting hearing aids binaurally.
    Punch JL; Jenison RL; Allan J; Durrant JD
    Ear Hear; 1991 Jun; 12(3):205-15. PubMed ID: 1916046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prediction of hearing aid users' satisfaction.
    Gerber SE; Fisher LB
    J Am Aud Soc; 1979; 5(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 511657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of pre-fitting counselling on the outcome of hearing aid fittings.
    Norman M; George CR; McCarthy D
    Scand Audiol; 1994; 23(4):257-63. PubMed ID: 7878377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Users' experience of a cochlear implant combined with a hearing aid.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm D; Chenier J; Armstrong S
    Int J Audiol; 2009 Apr; 48(4):172-82. PubMed ID: 19363718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [The outcome analysis of different age paragraph hearing aid users].
    Xu Q; Zhou H; Zhang J; Guo Y; Wang X
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 May; 26(10):436-9. PubMed ID: 22870713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
    Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.