BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3410183)

  • 21. [Participation of the right and left hemispheres in recognition of "noisy" visual stimuli in the rat].
    Udalova GP
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1984; 34(3):569-71. PubMed ID: 6475306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Effect of genotype on evoked potentials of the left and right hemispheres during perception of visual stimuli].
    Mariutina TM; Ivoshina TG
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1985; 35(6):1039-44. PubMed ID: 4090719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. On the role of response conflicts and stimulus position for hemispheric differences in global/local processing: an ERP study.
    Volberg G; Hübner R
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(13):1805-13. PubMed ID: 15351629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assessing effects of fixation demands on perception of lateralized words: A visual window technique for studying hemispheric asymmetry.
    Jordan TR; Patching GR
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(5):686-92. PubMed ID: 16223516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Hemispheric dominance in number perception.
    Simernitskaya EG; Blinkov SM; Yakovlev AI; Kopeel LV
    Hum Physiol; 1978; 4(6):779-83. PubMed ID: 757560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Hemispheric asymmetry in visual perception of temporal order.
    Shekerdjiiski S; Mitrani L
    Acta Physiol Pharmacol Bulg; 1985; 11(4):58-62. PubMed ID: 3835808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Lateral differences in visual processing: relative vs exclusive hemispheric specialization.
    Bruyer R
    Hum Neurobiol; 1986; 5(2):83-6. PubMed ID: 3733477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Visual recognition and hemispheric asymmetry. Tachistoscopic study of pattern recognition].
    Stanzione M; Angelini R; Orsini A; Grossi D
    Acta Neurol (Napoli); 1986 Aug; 8(4):340-6. PubMed ID: 3776713
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Interhemispheric asymmetry in the recognition of standardized and noise-modulated textural stimuli].
    Udalova GP; Kashina IA
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 1985; 11(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 3979711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Hemispheric asymmetry for spatially filtered stimuli belonging to different semantic categories.
    Viggiano MP; Costantini A; Vannucci M; Righi S
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Aug; 20(3):519-24. PubMed ID: 15268928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Tachistoscopy: an experimental method for studying cerebral hemispheric specialization].
    Belin C; Jullien S; Perrier D; Larmande P
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1990; 13(5):293-7. PubMed ID: 2258554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Hemisphere differences and judgments of simultaneity of brief light flashes.
    Newman S; Albino RC
    Percept Mot Skills; 1979 Dec; 49(3):943-56. PubMed ID: 530795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Interhemispheric transfer and integration of imagined visual stimuli.
    Savazzi S; Mancini F; Marzi CA
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Feb; 46(3):803-9. PubMed ID: 17920086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Widespread functional connectivity and fMRI fluctuations in human visual cortex in the absence of visual stimulation.
    Nir Y; Hasson U; Levy I; Yeshurun Y; Malach R
    Neuroimage; 2006 May; 30(4):1313-24. PubMed ID: 16413791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Visual evoked potentials to illusory contours (Kanizsa's square)].
    Korshunova SG
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1998; 48(5):807-15. PubMed ID: 9949530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Interhemispheric asymmetry during recognition of standard and noise-obscured textured stimuli.
    Udalova GP; Kashina IA
    Hum Physiol; 1985; 11(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 4077057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Interhemispheric asymmetry and the problem of the constancy of the visual perception of large and small sizes].
    Pakhomova AS
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 2000; 26(3):31-7. PubMed ID: 10905031
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of stimulus orientation on the visual evoked potential in multiple sclerosis.
    Camisa J; Mylin LH; Bodis-Wollner I
    Ann Neurol; 1981 Dec; 10(6):532-9. PubMed ID: 7325602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The bilateral advantage for famous faces: interhemispheric communication or competition?
    Baird LM; Burton AM
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Apr; 46(5):1581-7. PubMed ID: 18281066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Integration of surface information in primary visual cortex.
    MacEvoy SP; Kim W; Paradiso MA
    Nat Neurosci; 1998 Nov; 1(7):616-20. PubMed ID: 10196570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.