These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34102873)

  • 1.
    Talso M; Keller EX; Traxer O
    J Endourol; 2022 Mar; 36(3):418-419. PubMed ID: 34102873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Author's Response to
    Petzold R; Suarez-Ibarrola R
    J Endourol; 2022 Mar; 36(3):420. PubMed ID: 35297664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3.
    Teichman JMH; Jansen ED; Milner TE
    J Endourol; 2022 May; 36(5):684-685. PubMed ID: 35018827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Editorial Comment: Thulium fibre laser versus Holmium:YAG for ureteroscopic lithotripsy: outcomes from a prospective randomised clinical trial.
    Danilovic A
    Int Braz J Urol; 2023; 49(2):267-268. PubMed ID: 36825958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preclinical comparison of superpulse thulium fiber laser and a holmium:YAG laser for lithotripsy.
    Andreeva V; Vinarov A; Yaroslavsky I; Kovalenko A; Vybornov A; Rapoport L; Enikeev D; Sorokin N; Dymov A; Tsarichenko D; Glybochko P; Fried N; Traxer O; Altshuler G; Gapontsev V
    World J Urol; 2020 Feb; 38(2):497-503. PubMed ID: 31055626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6.
    Petzold R; Miernik A; Suarez-Ibarrola R
    J Endourol; 2021 Feb; 35(2):221-225. PubMed ID: 32799650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. High power holmium:YAG versus thulium fiber laser treatment of kidney stones in dusting mode: ablation rate and fragment size studies.
    Hardy LA; Vinnichenko V; Fried NM
    Lasers Surg Med; 2019 Aug; 51(6):522-530. PubMed ID: 30648761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. SuperPulsed Thulium fiber laser: The ultimate laser for lithotripsy?
    Keller EX; Traxer O
    Arch Esp Urol; 2020 Oct; 73(8):767-776. PubMed ID: 33025921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Re: Øyvind Ulvik, Mathias Sørstrand Æsøy, Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Peder Gjengstø, Christian Beisland. Thulium Fibre Laser Versus Holmium:YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial. Eur Urol. 2022;82:73-79: The Thulium Fibre Laser in Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Prospect and Risk Coexist?
    Li J; Huang Y; Cao D; Wei Q
    Eur Urol; 2022 Sep; 82(3):e71. PubMed ID: 35715364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Re: Thulium Fibre Laser versus Holmium:YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial.
    Corrales M; Traxer O
    Eur Urol; 2023 Feb; 83(2):184-185. PubMed ID: 36463075
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dusting Efficiency of a Novel Pulsed Thulium:Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser
    Kraft L; Yilmaz M; Petzold R; Gratzke C; Suarez-Ibarrola R; Miernik A
    J Endourol; 2022 Feb; 36(2):259-265. PubMed ID: 34693738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. RE: Retropulsion force in laser lithotripsy-an in vitro study comparing a Holmium device to a novel pulsed solid‑state thulium laser.
    Van Besien J; Keller EX; De Coninck V
    World J Urol; 2022 May; 40(5):1269-1270. PubMed ID: 34269861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Re: Øyvind Ulvik, Mathias Sørstrand Æsøy, Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Peder Gjengstø, Christian Beisland. Thulium Fibre Laser Versus Holmium:YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial. Eur Urol. 2022;82:73-9.
    Panthier F; Sierra A; Traxer O
    Eur Urol; 2022 Aug; 82(2):e35-e36. PubMed ID: 35527065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Re: Øyvind Ulvik, Mathias Sørstrand Æsøy, Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Peder Gjengstø, Christian Beisland. Thulium Fibre Laser versus Holmium:YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial. Eur Urol. 2022;82:73-9.
    Yaghoubian AJ; Khusid JA; Gupta M
    Eur Urol; 2022 Aug; 82(2):e43-e44. PubMed ID: 35661627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Re: Øyvind Ulvik, Mathias Sørstrand Æsøy, Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Peder Gjengstø, Christian Beisland. Thulium Fibre Laser versus Holmium:YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial. Eur Urol. 2022;82:73-9.
    Kim HJ; Ghani KR
    Eur Urol; 2022 Aug; 82(2):e39-e40. PubMed ID: 35606231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Experimental verification of thulium lithotripsy].
    Rapoport LM; Vinarov AZ; Sorokin NI; Dymov AM; Enikeev DV; Tsarichenko DG; Lekarev VY; Klimov RE; Andreeva VA; Kovalenko AA
    Urologiia; 2018 Dec; (5):74-80. PubMed ID: 30575354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Holmium:YAG (lambda = 2,120 nm) versus thulium fiber (lambda = 1,908 nm) laser lithotripsy.
    Blackmon RL; Irby PB; Fried NM
    Lasers Surg Med; 2010 Mar; 42(3):232-6. PubMed ID: 20333745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Operating room noise hazards during laser lithotripsy: a comparison between the thulium fiber and holmium laser platforms.
    Moore J; Chavez A; Narang G; Bogle J; Stern K
    World J Urol; 2022 Mar; 40(3):801-805. PubMed ID: 35059787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Editorial Comment on: Ureteroscopic High-Frequency Dusting Utilizing a 120-W Holmium Laser by Tracey et al.
    Kronenberg P
    J Endourol; 2018 Apr; 32(4):296. PubMed ID: 29495879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is Very High Power/Frequency Really Necessary During Laser Lithotripsy? RE: Understanding the Popcorn Effect During Holmium Laser Lithotripsy for Dusting (Aldoukhi et al, Urology. 2018 Dec;122:52-57).
    Ventimiglia E; Traxer O
    Urology; 2019 May; 127():135. PubMed ID: 30794907
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.