These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34102901)

  • 1. A significant change towards cemented fixation in revision total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 55 years in the Netherlands: results of an observational cohort study in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register in 28,516 primary hip replacements and 1285 revision procedures.
    Kuijpers MF; Hannink G; van Steenbergen LN; Schreurs BW
    Hip Int; 2023 Mar; 33(2):288-297. PubMed ID: 34102901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outcome of revision hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 55 years: an analysis of 1,037 revisions in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register.
    Kuijpers MFL; Hannink G; van Steenbergen LN; Schreurs BW
    Acta Orthop; 2020 Apr; 91(2):165-170. PubMed ID: 31928096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do Rerevision Rates Differ After First-time Revision of Primary THA With a Cemented and Cementless Femoral Component?
    Gromov K; Pedersen AB; Overgaard S; Gebuhr P; Malchau H; Troelsen A
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3391-8. PubMed ID: 25762017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Uncemented and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.
    Hailer NP; Garellick G; Kärrholm J
    Acta Orthop; 2010 Feb; 81(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 20180715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is the Survivorship of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Better Than Selected Conventional Hip Arthroplasties in Men Younger Than 65 Years of Age? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Stoney J; Graves SE; de Steiger RN; Rainbird S; Kelly TL; Hatton A
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Nov; 478(11):2625-2636. PubMed ID: 32898048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Influence of the Type of Hip-Component Fixation and Age of Patients on Mid-Term Revision Rate of Total Hip Replacement].
    Kubinec V
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2018; 85(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 30257769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fixation, sex, and age: highest risk of revision for uncemented stems in elderly women - data from 66,995 primary total hip arthroplasties in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.
    Dale H; Børsheim S; Kristensen TB; Fenstad AM; Gjertsen JE; Hallan G; Lie SA; Furnes O
    Acta Orthop; 2020 Feb; 91(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 31663413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Population-based 10-year cumulative revision risks after hip and knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis to inform patients in clinical practice: a competing risk analysis from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register.
    Gademan MGJ; Van Steenbergen LN; Cannegieter SC; Nelissen RGHH; Marang-Van De Mheen PJ
    Acta Orthop; 2021 Jun; 92(3):280-284. PubMed ID: 33478320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Has the Use of Fixation Techniques in THA Changed in This Decade? The Uncemented Paradox Revisited.
    Bunyoz KI; Malchau E; Malchau H; Troelsen A
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Apr; 478(4):697-704. PubMed ID: 31899744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Uncemented or cemented revision stems? Analysis of 2,296 first-time hip revision arthroplasties performed due to aseptic loosening, reported to the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.
    Tyson Y; Rolfson O; Kärrholm J; Hailer NP; Mohaddes M
    Acta Orthop; 2019 Oct; 90(5):421-426. PubMed ID: 31154890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The outcome of subsequent revisions after primary total hip arthroplasty in 1,049 patients aged under 50 years : a single-centre cohort study with a follow-up of more than 30 years.
    Kuijpers MFL; Colo E; Schmitz MWJL; Hannink G; Rijnen WHC; Schreurs BW
    Bone Joint J; 2022 Mar; 104-B(3):368-375. PubMed ID: 35227093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparable mortality but higher revision rate after uncemented compared with cemented total hip arthroplasties in patients 80 years and older: report of 43,053 cases of the Dutch Arthroplasty Register.
    Bloemheuvel EM; Van Steenbergen LN; Swierstra BA
    Acta Orthop; 2022 Jan; 93():151-157. PubMed ID: 34984473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improved survival of uncemented versus cemented femoral stems in patients aged < 70 years in a community total joint registry.
    Wechter J; Comfort TK; Tatman P; Mehle S; Gioe TJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 Nov; 471(11):3588-95. PubMed ID: 23873609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dual mobility cups in primary total hip arthroplasties: trend over time in use, patient characteristics, and mid-term revision in 3,038 cases in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (2007-2016).
    Bloemheuvel EM; van Steenbergen LN; Swierstra BA
    Acta Orthop; 2019 Feb; 90(1):11-14. PubMed ID: 30451041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty in 30,830 patients with hip fractures: data from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register on revision and risk factors for revision.
    Moerman S; Mathijssen NMC; Tuinebreijer WE; Vochteloo AJH; Nelissen RGHH
    Acta Orthop; 2018 Oct; 89(5):509-514. PubMed ID: 30080985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do Dual-mobility Cups Reduce Revision Risk in Femoral Neck Fractures Compared With Conventional THA Designs? An International Meta-analysis of Arthroplasty Registries.
    Farey JE; Masters J; Cuthbert AR; Iversen P; van Steenbergen LN; Prentice HA; Adie S; Sayers A; Whitehouse MR; Paxton EW; Costa ML; Overgaard S; Rogmark C; Rolfson O; Harris IA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Oct; 480(10):1912-1925. PubMed ID: 35767813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The risk of revision after total hip arthroplasty in young patients depends on surgical approach, femoral head size and bearing type; an analysis of 19,682 operations in the Dutch arthroplasty register.
    Kuijpers MFL; Hannink G; Vehmeijer SBW; van Steenbergen LN; Schreurs BW
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Aug; 20(1):385. PubMed ID: 31438921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Should patient age thresholds dictate fixation strategy in total hip arthroplasty?
    Bloch BV; White JJE; Matar HE; Berber R; Manktelow ARJ
    Bone Joint J; 2022 Feb; 104-B(2):206-211. PubMed ID: 35094580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Revision risk of salvage compared with acute total hip arthroplasty following femoral neck fracture: an analysis from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register.
    Schmitz PP; Hannink G; Somford MP; Schreurs BW; Van Susante JLC
    Acta Orthop; 2023 Jul; 94():399-403. PubMed ID: 37522279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What Is the Outcome of the First Revision Procedure of Primary THA for Osteoarthritis? A Study From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    de Steiger RN; Lewis PL; Harris I; Lorimer MF; Graves SE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Oct; 480(10):1952-1970. PubMed ID: 35980886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.