These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34102901)

  • 21. What Is the Rerevision Rate After Revising a Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty? Analysis From the AOANJRR.
    Wong JM; Liu YL; Graves S; de Steiger R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3458-64. PubMed ID: 25721576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Similar revision rate after cemented and cementless femoral revisions for periprosthetic femoral fractures in total hip arthroplasty: analysis of 1,879 revision hip arthroplasties in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register.
    Van Dooren B; Peters RM; Jutte PC; Stevens M; Schreurs BW; Zijlstra WP
    Acta Orthop; 2023 May; 94():260-265. PubMed ID: 37221904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthrosis in younger patients in the Finnish arthroplasty register. 4,661 primary replacements followed for 0-22 years.
    Eskelinen A; Remes V; Helenius I; Pulkkinen P; Nevalainen J; Paavolainen P
    Acta Orthop; 2005 Feb; 76(1):28-41. PubMed ID: 15788305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Promoting cemented fixation of the femoral stem in elderly female hip arthroplasty patients and elderly hip fracture patients: a retrospective cohort study from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register and the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register.
    Gjertsen JE; Nilsen D; Furnes O; Hallan G; Kroken G; Dybvik E; Fenstad AM
    Acta Orthop; 2024 Feb; 95():130-137. PubMed ID: 38391278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Association between fixation technique and revision risk in total hip arthroplasty patients younger than 55 years of age. Results from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association.
    Pedersen AB; Mehnert F; Havelin LI; Furnes O; Herberts P; Kärrholm J; Garellick G; Mäkela K; Eskelinen A; Overgaard S
    Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2014 May; 22(5):659-67. PubMed ID: 24631923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. What Are the Frequency, Related Mortality, and Factors Associated with Bone Cement Implantation Syndrome in Arthroplasty Surgery?
    Rassir R; Schuiling M; Sierevelt IN; van der Hoeven CWP; Nolte PA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Apr; 479(4):755-763. PubMed ID: 33165048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Use of dual-mobility cup in revision hip arthroplasty reduces the risk for further dislocation: analysis of seven hundred and ninety one first-time revisions performed due to dislocation, reported to the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.
    Mohaddes M; Cnudde P; Rolfson O; Wall A; Kärrholm J
    Int Orthop; 2017 Mar; 41(3):583-588. PubMed ID: 28078362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Surgical procedures in the treatment of 784 infected THAs reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.
    Engesæter LB; Dale H; Schrama JC; Hallan G; Lie SA
    Acta Orthop; 2011 Oct; 82(5):530-7. PubMed ID: 21992085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Risk factors for revision surgery due to dislocation within 1 year after 111,711 primary total hip arthroplasties from 2005 to 2019: a study from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.
    Thoen PS; Lygre SHL; Nordsletten L; Furnes O; Stigum H; Hallan G; Röhrl SM
    Acta Orthop; 2022 Jun; 93():593-601. PubMed ID: 35770369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Outcome of revised metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties: a Dutch arthroplasty register study.
    Jelsma J; van Kuijk SMJ; Spekenbrink-Spooren A; Grimm B; Heyligers IC; Schotanus MGM
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2022 Dec; 142(12):4025-4032. PubMed ID: 34846589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Hybrid Fixation for Total Hip Arthroplasty Showed Improved Survival Over Cemented and Uncemented Fixation: A Single-Center Survival Analysis of 2156 Hips at 12-18 Years.
    Fowler AK; Gray AR; Gwynne-Jones DP
    J Arthroplasty; 2019 Nov; 34(11):2711-2717. PubMed ID: 31301914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Perioperative, short-, and long-term mortality related to fixation in primary total hip arthroplasty: a study on 79,557 patients in the -Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.
    Dale H; Børsheim S; Kristensen TB; Fenstad AM; Gjertsen JE; Hallan G; Lie SA; Furnes O
    Acta Orthop; 2020 Apr; 91(2):152-158. PubMed ID: 31833434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Total hip arthroplasties in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI) and the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA): comparison of patient and procedure characteristics in 475,685 cases.
    Van Steenbergen LN; Mäkelä KT; Kärrholm J; Rolfson O; Overgaard S; Furnes O; Pedersen AB; Eskelinen A; Hallan G; Schreurs BW; Nelissen RGHH
    Acta Orthop; 2021 Feb; 92(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 33167753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Long-term follow-up and survival of delayed total hip arthroplasty following acetabular fracture: a matched cohort study of 552 cases from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.
    Kirkeboe RL; Nordsletten L; Madsen JE; Dybvik E; Lie SA; Hallan G; Clarke-Jenssen J
    Hip Int; 2024 May; 34(3):396-401. PubMed ID: 37990005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Is Cemented or Cementless Femoral Stem Fixation More Durable in Patients Older Than 75 Years of Age? A Comparison of the Best-performing Stems.
    Tanzer M; Graves SE; Peng A; Shimmin AJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Jul; 476(7):1428-1437. PubMed ID: 29683803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Causes of Revision in Young Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Kahlenberg CA; Swarup I; Krell EC; Heinz N; Figgie MP
    J Arthroplasty; 2019 Jul; 34(7):1435-1440. PubMed ID: 30948287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Systematic review of the outcome of cemented versus uncemented total hip arthroplasty following pelvic irradiation.
    Walters S; Prasad A; Guevel B; Sarraf KM; Achan P; Dawson-Bowling S; Millington S; Hanna SA
    Musculoskelet Surg; 2019 Dec; 103(3):221-230. PubMed ID: 30937859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Does cement increase the risk of infection in primary total hip arthroplasty? Revision rates in 56,275 cemented and uncemented primary THAs followed for 0-16 years in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.
    Engesaeter LB; Espehaug B; Lie SA; Furnes O; Havelin LI
    Acta Orthop; 2006 Jun; 77(3):351-8. PubMed ID: 16819671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparing modern uncemented, hybrid and cemented implant combinations in older patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty, a New Zealand Joint Registry study.
    Boyle AB; Zhu M; Frampton C; Poutawera V; Vane A
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2023 Jun; 143(6):3597-3604. PubMed ID: 36102955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Thirty years of experience with instrumented femoral impaction bone grafting and a cemented polished Exeter stem : a prospective cohort study of 208 revision arthroplasties performed between 1991 and 2007.
    Özdemir E; Kuijpers MFL; Visser J; Schreurs BW; Rijnen WHC
    Bone Joint J; 2022 Sep; 104-B(9):1039-1046. PubMed ID: 36047023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.