These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34105092)

  • 21. Visual search in Alzheimer's disease: a deficiency in processing conjunctions of features.
    Tales A; Butler SR; Fossey J; Gilchrist ID; Jones RW; Troscianko T
    Neuropsychologia; 2002; 40(12):1849-57. PubMed ID: 12207983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Object-based target templates guide attention during visual search.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Sep; 44(9):1368-1382. PubMed ID: 29723006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. What underlies visual selective attention development? Evidence that age-related improvements in visual feature integration influence visual selective attention performance.
    Lynn A; Festa EK; Heindel WC; Amso D
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2020 Mar; 191():104732. PubMed ID: 31770683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The selection balance: Contrasting value, proximity and priming in a multitarget foraging task.
    Tagu J; Kristjánsson Á
    Cognition; 2022 Jan; 218():104935. PubMed ID: 34673302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Visual search for features and conjunctions in development.
    Lobaugh NJ; Cole S; Rovet JF
    Can J Exp Psychol; 1998 Dec; 52(4):201-12. PubMed ID: 10095853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. What limits search for conjunctions of simple visual features?
    Põder E; Kosilo M
    J Vis; 2019 Jul; 19(7):4. PubMed ID: 31287858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Category-based guidance of spatial attention during visual search for feature conjunctions.
    Nako R; Grubert A; Eimer M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1571-86. PubMed ID: 27213833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Age, target-distractor similarity, and visual search.
    Scialfa CT; Esau SP; Joffe KM
    Exp Aging Res; 1998; 24(4):337-58. PubMed ID: 9783154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. How humans react to changing rewards during visual foraging.
    Zhang J; Gong X; Fougnie D; Wolfe JM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Nov; 79(8):2299-2309. PubMed ID: 28856626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Neural correlates of context-dependent feature conjunction learning in visual search tasks.
    Reavis EA; Frank SM; Greenlee MW; Tse PU
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2016 Jun; 37(6):2319-30. PubMed ID: 26970441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Foraging behavior in visual search: A review of theoretical and mathematical models in humans and animals.
    Bella-Fernández M; Suero Suñé M; Gil-Gómez de Liaño B
    Psychol Res; 2022 Mar; 86(2):331-349. PubMed ID: 33745028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. More insight into the interplay of response selection and visual attention in dual-tasks: masked visual search and response selection are performed in parallel.
    Reimer CB; Schubert T
    Psychol Res; 2019 Apr; 83(3):459-475. PubMed ID: 28917014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of aging and distractors on detection of redundant visual targets and capacity: do older adults integrate visual targets differently than younger adults?
    Ben-David BM; Eidels A; Donkin C
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e113551. PubMed ID: 25501850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Selective search for conjunctively defined targets by children and young adults.
    Merrill EC; Lookadoo R
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2004 Sep; 89(1):72-90. PubMed ID: 15336919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Feature-guided attentional capture cannot be prevented by spatial filtering.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    Biol Psychol; 2018 Apr; 134():1-8. PubMed ID: 29458180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Common attentional constraints in visual foraging.
    Kristjánsson Á; Jóhannesson ÓI; Thornton IM
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e100752. PubMed ID: 24964082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Target objects defined by a conjunction of colour and shape can be selected independently and in parallel.
    Jenkins M; Grubert A; Eimer M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Nov; 79(8):2310-2326. PubMed ID: 28849409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Age differences in visual search for feature, conjunction, and triple-conjunction targets.
    Humphrey DG; Kramer AF
    Psychol Aging; 1997 Dec; 12(4):704-17. PubMed ID: 9416638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. When is it time to move to the next map? Optimal foraging in guided visual search.
    Ehinger KA; Wolfe JM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):2135-51. PubMed ID: 27192994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Attention parameters in visual search tasks in various human age groups].
    Baranov-Krylov IN; Kuznetsova TG; Ratnikova VK
    Ross Fiziol Zh Im I M Sechenova; 2008 Jun; 94(6):617-26. PubMed ID: 18727371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.