159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34105758)
21. Uterus transplantation for fertility preservation in patients with gynecologic cancer.
Dahm-Kähler P; Kvarnström N; Alfonzo Rodriguez E; Skogsberg Dahlgren U; Brännström M
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2021 Mar; 31(3):371-378. PubMed ID: 33649004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. DUETS (Dallas UtErus Transplant Study): Complete report of 6-month and initial 2-year outcomes following open donor hysterectomy.
Ramani A; Testa G; Ghouri Y; Koon EC; Di Salvo M; McKenna GJ; Bayer J; Marie Warren A; Wall A; Johannesson L
Clin Transplant; 2020 Jan; 34(1):e13757. PubMed ID: 31758566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A systematic review and cost analysis of robot-assisted hysterectomy in malignant and benign conditions.
Tapper AM; Hannola M; Zeitlin R; Isojärvi J; Sintonen H; Ikonen TS
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Jun; 177():1-10. PubMed ID: 24703710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Hysterectomy after uterus transplantation and detailed analyses of graft failures.
Karlsson CC; Dahm-Kähler P; Kvarnström N; Mölne J; Broecker V; Brännström M
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Mar; 101(3):355-363. PubMed ID: 34907538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Novel approaches in uterus transplantation.
Brännström M; Kvarnström N; Dahm-Kähler P
Curr Opin Organ Transplant; 2020 Dec; 25(6):584-593. PubMed ID: 33044349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A randomized trial comparing vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy vs robot-assisted hysterectomy.
Lönnerfors C; Reynisson P; Persson J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 25045857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Initial Experience with the Use of a Robotic Stapler for Robot-Assisted Donor Nephrectomy.
Perkins SQ; Giffen ZC; Buck BJ; Ortiz J; Sindhwani P; Ekwenna O
J Endourol; 2018 Nov; 32(11):1054-1057. PubMed ID: 30160167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. One uterus bridging three generations: first live birth after mother-to-daughter uterus transplantation.
Brännström M; Bokström H; Dahm-Kähler P; Diaz-Garcia C; Ekberg J; Enskog A; Hagberg H; Johannesson L; Kvarnström N; Mölne J; Olausson M; Olofsson JI; Rodriguez-Wallberg K
Fertil Steril; 2016 Aug; 106(2):261-6. PubMed ID: 27125227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Technological Advancements in Uterus Transplantation.
McKenna GJ; Johannesson L; Testa G
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Mar; 65(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 35045024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Living-Donor Uterus Transplantation: A Clinical Review.
Veroux M; Scollo P; Giambra MM; Roscitano G; Giaquinta A; Setacci F; Veroux P
J Clin Med; 2024 Jan; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 38337468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Laparotomy or minimal invasive surgery in uterus transplantation: a comparison.
Ayoubi JM; Carbonnel M; Pirtea P; Kvarnström N; Brännström M; Dahm-Kähler P
Fertil Steril; 2019 Jul; 112(1):11-18. PubMed ID: 31277761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Relationship between uterine veins, ureter, and hypogastric nerve for uterine transplantation: An anatomic study.
Robin F; Dion L; Lavoue V; Goujon A; Boudjema K; Sulpice L; Morandi X; Nyangoh Timoh K
Clin Anat; 2022 Nov; 35(8):1026-1032. PubMed ID: 35293032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Total robot-assisted recipient's surgery in living donor liver transplantation: First step towards the future.
Lee KW; Choi Y; Lee S; Hong SY; Suh S; Han ES; Hong SK; Yang SM; Yi NJ; Suh KS
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2023 Oct; 30(10):1198-1200. PubMed ID: 36866566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Ethical aspects of uterus transplantation].
Chmel R; Nováčková M; Pastor Z; Matěcha J; Čekal M; Froněk J
Cas Lek Cesk; 2017; 156(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 28264580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Team preparation for human uterus transplantation: Autologous transplantation in sheep model.
Solomonov E; Marcus Braun N; Siman-Tov Y; Ben-Shachar I
Clin Transplant; 2017 Dec; 31(12):. PubMed ID: 29032587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Robot-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial and cervical cancers: a systematic review.
Nevis IF; Vali B; Higgins C; Dhalla I; Urbach D; Bernardini MQ
J Robot Surg; 2017 Mar; 11(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 27424111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Laparoscopic-Assisted Uterus Retrieval From Live Organ Donors for Uterine Transplant: Our Experience of Two Patients.
Puntambekar S; Telang M; Kulkarni P; Puntambekar S; Jadhav S; Panse M; Sathe R; Agarkhedkar N; Warty N; Kade S; Manchekar M; Parekh H; Parikh K; Desai R; Mehta M; Chitale M; Kinholkar B; Jana JS; Pare A; Sadre A; Karnik S; Mane A; Gandhi G; Kanade S; Phadke U
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(4):622-631. PubMed ID: 29366966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A prospective, comparative study on robotic versus open-surgery hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma.
Eklind S; Lindfors A; Sjöli P; Dahm-Kähler P
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Feb; 25(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 25611898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Vascular pedicle lengths after hysterectomy: toward future human uterus transplantation.
Johannesson L; Diaz-Garcia C; Leonhardt H; Dahm-Kähler P; Marcickiewicz J; Olausson M; Brännström M
Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jun; 119(6):1219-25. PubMed ID: 22617587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
