408 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34106694)
1. Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from U.S. Light-Duty Transport in Line with the 2 °C Target.
Zhu Y; Skerlos S; Xu M; Cooper DR
Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Jul; 55(13):9326-9338. PubMed ID: 34106694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Greenhouse gas emission benefits of adopting new energy vehicles in Suzhou City, China: A case study.
Da C; Gu X; Lu C; Hua R; Chang X; Cheng Y; Qian F; Wang Y
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Oct; 29(50):76286-76297. PubMed ID: 35668254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Well-to-wheel greenhouse gas emissions of electric versus combustion vehicles from 2018 to 2030 in the US.
Challa R; Kamath D; Anctil A
J Environ Manage; 2022 Apr; 308():114592. PubMed ID: 35121453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of the USPS Next-Generation Delivery Vehicle Fleet.
Woody M; Vaishnav P; Craig MT; Keoleian GA
Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Sep; 56(18):13391-13397. PubMed ID: 36018721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Dynamic Fleet Model of U.S Light-Duty Vehicle Lightweighting and Associated Greenhouse Gas Emissions from 2016 to 2050.
Milovanoff A; Kim HC; De Kleine R; Wallington TJ; Posen ID; MacLean HL
Environ Sci Technol; 2019 Feb; 53(4):2199-2208. PubMed ID: 30682256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Regional Heterogeneity in the Emissions Benefits of Electrified and Lightweighted Light-Duty Vehicles.
Wu D; Guo F; Field FR; De Kleine RD; Kim HC; Wallington TJ; Kirchain RE
Environ Sci Technol; 2019 Sep; 53(18):10560-10570. PubMed ID: 31336049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Provincial Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Gasoline and Plug-in Electric Vehicles in China: Comparison from the Consumption-Based Electricity Perspective.
Gan Y; Lu Z; He X; Hao C; Wang Y; Cai H; Wang M; Elgowainy A; Przesmitzki S; Bouchard J
Environ Sci Technol; 2021 May; 55(10):6944-6956. PubMed ID: 33945267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Current and Future United States Light-Duty Vehicle Pathways: Cradle-to-Grave Lifecycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Economic Assessment.
Elgowainy A; Han J; Ward J; Joseck F; Gohlke D; Lindauer A; Ramsden T; Biddy M; Alexander M; Barnhart S; Sutherland I; Verduzco L; Wallington TJ
Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Feb; 52(4):2392-2399. PubMed ID: 29298387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Potential for Electrified Vehicles to Contribute to U.S. Petroleum and Climate Goals and Implications for Advanced Biofuels.
Meier PJ; Cronin KR; Frost EA; Runge TM; Dale BE; Reinemann DJ; Detlor J
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 49(14):8277-86. PubMed ID: 26086692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Which type of electric vehicle is worth promoting mostly in the context of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality? A case study for a metropolis in China.
Yu Y; Xu H; Cheng J; Wan F; Ju L; Liu Q; Liu J
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Sep; 837():155626. PubMed ID: 35504393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A life-cycle comparison of alternative automobile fuels.
MacLean HL; Lave LB; Lankey R; Joshi S
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2000 Oct; 50(10):1769-79. PubMed ID: 11288305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Decarbonization potential of electrifying 50% of U.S. light-duty vehicle sales by 2030.
Woody M; Keoleian GA; Vaishnav P
Nat Commun; 2023 Nov; 14(1):7077. PubMed ID: 37925546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution caused by light and heavy duty vehicles with battery-electric, fuel cell-electric and catenary trucks.
Breuer JL; Samsun RC; Stolten D; Peters R
Environ Int; 2021 Jul; 152():106474. PubMed ID: 33711760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact assessment of crude oil mix, electricity generation mix, and vehicle technology on road freight emission reduction in China.
Jiang Z; Yan R; Gong Z; Guan G
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Feb; 30(10):27763-27781. PubMed ID: 36385332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing the European Electric-Mobility Transition: Emissions from Electric Vehicle Manufacturing and Use in Relation to the EU Greenhouse Gas Emission Targets.
Tang C; Tukker A; Sprecher B; Mogollón JM
Environ Sci Technol; 2023 Jan; 57(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 36574507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of life cycle greenhouse gases from natural gas pathways for medium and heavy-duty vehicles.
Tong F; Jaramillo P; Azevedo IM
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jun; 49(12):7123-33. PubMed ID: 25938939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Charging Strategies to Minimize Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Electrified Delivery Vehicles.
Woody M; Vaishnav P; Craig MT; Lewis GM; Keoleian GA
Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Jul; 55(14):10108-10120. PubMed ID: 34240846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Should India Move toward Vehicle Electrification? Assessing Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas and Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions of Alternative and Conventional Fuel Vehicles in India.
Peshin T; Sengupta S; Azevedo IML
Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Jul; 56(13):9569-9582. PubMed ID: 35696339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fuelling the sustainable future: a comparative analysis between battery electrical vehicles (BEV) and fuel cell electrical vehicles (FCEV).
Parikh A; Shah M; Prajapati M
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Apr; 30(20):57236-57252. PubMed ID: 37010685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Private versus Shared, Automated Electric Vehicles for U.S. Personal Mobility: Energy Use, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Grid Integration, and Cost Impacts.
Sheppard CJR; Jenn AT; Greenblatt JB; Bauer GS; Gerke BF
Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Mar; 55(5):3229-3239. PubMed ID: 33566604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
