These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3410714)
1. Application of the ICRP recommendations to revised secondary radiation protection standards. Kennedy WE; Corley JP Health Phys; 1988 Aug; 55(2):427-31. PubMed ID: 3410714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of the draft 2005 recommendations of ICRP on secondary derived regulatory values being considered by the US Department of Energy. O'Connell P Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 118(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 16105895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 39th Lauriston S. Taylor Lecture: Dosimetry of Internal Emitters: Contribution of Radiation Protection Bodies and Radiological Events. Eckerman KF Health Phys; 2016 Feb; 110(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 26717179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiation protection principles of NCRP. Kase KR Health Phys; 2004 Sep; 87(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 15303061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. U.S. radiation protection: role of national and international recommendations and opportunities for collaboration (harmony, not dissonance). Boyd MA Health Phys; 2015 Feb; 108(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 25551510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Control of low-level radiation exposure: time for a change? Clarke R J Radiol Prot; 1999 Jun; 19(2):107-15. PubMed ID: 10400149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Implementation of the ICRP 2007 recommendations in Korea. Cho KW; Kim YM Appl Radiat Isot; 2009; 67(7-8):1286-9. PubMed ID: 19299151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Standards for standard-makers? A testing time. Thomas RH Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(4):277-89. PubMed ID: 15273345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relationship between kidney burden and radiation dose from chronic ingestion of U: implications for radiation standards for the public. Kocher DC Health Phys; 1989 Jul; 57(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 2663782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New ICRP recommendations. Wrixon AD J Radiol Prot; 2008 Jun; 28(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 18495983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing dose of the representative person for the purpose of radiation protection of the public. ICRP publication 101. Approved by the Commission in September 2005. ICRP Ann ICRP; 2006; 36(3):vii-viii, 5-62. PubMed ID: 17174713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiation protection--a look to the future: ICRP perceptions. Lindell B Health Phys; 1988 Aug; 55(2):145-7. PubMed ID: 3410680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. ICRP Publication 134: Occupational Intakes of Radionuclides: Part 2. Paquet F; Bailey MR; Leggett RW; Lipsztein J; Fell TP; Smith T; Nosske D; Eckerman KF; Berkovski V; Ansoborlo E; Giussani A; Bolch WE; Harrison JD; Ann ICRP; 2016 Dec; 45(3-4):7-349. PubMed ID: 28657340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The evolution of the international system of radiological protection: food for thought from the Nuclear Energy Agency Committee on Radiation Protection and Public Health. Lazo T J Radiol Prot; 2003 Sep; 23(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 14582716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Regulatory perceptions of the future: a view from the United States. Vallario EJ Health Phys; 1988 Aug; 55(2):385-9. PubMed ID: 3410708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Implementation of the 1990 recommendations of ICRP in the countries of the European Community. Clarke RH; Stather JW Radiat Environ Biophys; 1993; 32(2):151-61. PubMed ID: 8337359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]