These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34109222)

  • 1. Adaptive Cognitive Mechanisms to Maintain Calibrated Trust and Reliance in Automation.
    Lebiere C; Blaha LM; Fallon CK; Jefferson B
    Front Robot AI; 2021; 8():652776. PubMed ID: 34109222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The reliability and transparency bases of trust in human-swarm interaction: principles and implications.
    Hussein A; Elsawah S; Abbass HA
    Ergonomics; 2020 Sep; 63(9):1116-1132. PubMed ID: 32370651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The More You Know: Trust Dynamics and Calibration in Highly Automated Driving and the Effects of Take-Overs, System Malfunction, and System Transparency.
    Kraus J; Scholz D; Stiegemeier D; Baumann M
    Hum Factors; 2020 Aug; 62(5):718-736. PubMed ID: 31233695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trust Mediating Reliability-Reliance Relationship in Supervisory Control of Human-Swarm Interactions.
    Hussein A; Elsawah S; Abbass HA
    Hum Factors; 2020 Dec; 62(8):1237-1248. PubMed ID: 31590574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Providing different levels of accuracy about the reliability of automation to a human operator: impact on human performance.
    Avril E
    Ergonomics; 2023 Feb; 66(2):217-226. PubMed ID: 35451925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Not All Information Is Equal: Effects of Disclosing Different Types of Likelihood Information on Trust, Compliance and Reliance, and Task Performance in Human-Automation Teaming.
    Du N; Huang KY; Yang XJ
    Hum Factors; 2020 Sep; 62(6):987-1001. PubMed ID: 31348863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Individual differences in the calibration of trust in automation.
    Pop VL; Shrewsbury A; Durso FT
    Hum Factors; 2015 Jun; 57(4):545-56. PubMed ID: 25977317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Trust in automation: designing for appropriate reliance.
    Lee JD; See KA
    Hum Factors; 2004; 46(1):50-80. PubMed ID: 15151155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do concurrent task demands impact the benefit of automation transparency?
    Tatasciore M; Bowden V; Loft S
    Appl Ergon; 2023 Jul; 110():104022. PubMed ID: 37019048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of information source, pedigree, and reliability on operator interaction with decision support systems.
    Madhavan P; Wiegmann DA
    Hum Factors; 2007 Oct; 49(5):773-85. PubMed ID: 17915596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Trust in automation: integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust.
    Hoff KA; Bashir M
    Hum Factors; 2015 May; 57(3):407-34. PubMed ID: 25875432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Human Performance Consequences of Automated Decision Aids: The Impact of Time Pressure.
    Rieger T; Manzey D
    Hum Factors; 2022 Jun; 64(4):617-634. PubMed ID: 33111557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. From Trust in Automation to Decision Neuroscience: Applying Cognitive Neuroscience Methods to Understand and Improve Interaction Decisions Involved in Human Automation Interaction.
    Drnec K; Marathe AR; Lukos JR; Metcalfe JS
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2016; 10():290. PubMed ID: 27445741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are well-calibrated users effective users? Associations between calibration of trust and performance on an automation-aided task.
    Merritt SM; Lee D; Unnerstall JL; Huber K
    Hum Factors; 2015 Feb; 57(1):34-47. PubMed ID: 25790569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Trust and reliance on an automated combat identification system.
    Wang L; Jamieson GA; Hollands JG
    Hum Factors; 2009 Jun; 51(3):281-91. PubMed ID: 19750792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Human-human reliance in the context of automation.
    Lyons JB; Stokes CK
    Hum Factors; 2012 Feb; 54(1):112-21. PubMed ID: 22409106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Displaying contextual information reduces the costs of imperfect decision automation in rapid retasking of ISR assets.
    Rovira E; Cross A; Leitch E; Bonaceto C
    Hum Factors; 2014 Sep; 56(6):1036-49. PubMed ID: 25277015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Extending Three Existing Models to Analysis of Trust in Automation: Signal Detection, Statistical Parameter Estimation, and Model-Based Control.
    Sheridan TB
    Hum Factors; 2019 Nov; 61(7):1162-1170. PubMed ID: 30811950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inferring Trust From Users' Behaviours; Agents' Predictability Positively Affects Trust, Task Performance and Cognitive Load in Human-Agent Real-Time Collaboration.
    Daronnat S; Azzopardi L; Halvey M; Dubiel M
    Front Robot AI; 2021; 8():642201. PubMed ID: 34307467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Effect of Incorrect Reliability Information on Expectations, Perceptions, and Use of Automation.
    Barg-Walkow LH; Rogers WA
    Hum Factors; 2016 Mar; 58(2):242-60. PubMed ID: 26519483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.