These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34109559)

  • 1. Using Sankey diagrams to visualize drag and drop action sequences in technology-enhanced items.
    Gong T; Jiang Y; Saldivia LE; Agard C
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Feb; 54(1):117-132. PubMed ID: 34109559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagrams benefit symbolic problem-solving.
    Chu J; Rittle-Johnson B; Fyfe ER
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2017 Jun; 87(2):273-287. PubMed ID: 28299771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computer-adaptive testing: the impact of test characteristics on perceived performance and test takers' reactions.
    Tonidandel S; Quiñones MA; Adams AA
    J Appl Psychol; 2002 Apr; 87(2):320-32. PubMed ID: 12002960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gender differences in advanced mathematical problem solving.
    Gallagher AM; De Lisi R; Holst PC; McGillicuddy-De Lisi AV; Morely M; Cahalan C
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2000 Mar; 75(3):165-90. PubMed ID: 10666324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Overview of Sankey flow diagrams: Focusing on symptom trajectories in older adults with advanced cancer.
    Otto E; Culakova E; Meng S; Zhang Z; Xu H; Mohile S; Flannery MA
    J Geriatr Oncol; 2022 Jun; 13(5):742-746. PubMed ID: 35000890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. PSM7 and PSM8: Validating Two Problem-solving Measures.
    Bostic JD; Sondergeld TA; Folger T; Kruse L
    J Appl Meas; 2017; 18(2):151-162. PubMed ID: 28961151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Knowledge assessment: Squeezing information from multiple-choice testing.
    Nickerson RS; Butler SF; Carlin MT
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2015 Jun; 21(2):167-77. PubMed ID: 25642780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of Embedded Experience Sampling (EES) for Measuring Non-cognitive Facets of Problem-Solving Competence in Scenario-Based Assessments.
    Rausch A; Kögler K; Seifried J
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1200. PubMed ID: 31178807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exploring the Design Space of Sankey Diagrams for the Food-Energy-Water Nexus.
    Mathis B; Ma Y; Mancenido M; Maciejewski R
    IEEE Comput Graph Appl; 2021; 41(2):25-34. PubMed ID: 31295107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Psychometric Properties of an Instrument to Measure Word Problem Solving Skills in Mathematics.
    Jiang C; Kim DH; Wang C
    J Appl Meas; 2018; 19(3):283-302. PubMed ID: 30169336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Teaching students with LD to use diagrams to solve mathematical word problems.
    van Garderen D
    J Learn Disabil; 2007; 40(6):540-53. PubMed ID: 18064979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three Modeling Applications to Promote Automatic Item Generation for Examinations in Dentistry.
    Lai H; Gierl MJ; Byrne BE; Spielman AI; Waldschmidt DM
    J Dent Educ; 2016 Mar; 80(3):339-47. PubMed ID: 26933110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of an educational taxonomy for evaluation of cognitive performance.
    Buckwalter JA; Schumacher R; Albright JP; Cooper RR
    J Med Educ; 1981 Feb; 56(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 7463444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of solving related proofs on memory and transfer in geometry problem solving.
    Lovett MC; Anderson JR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1994 Mar; 20(2):366-78. PubMed ID: 8151276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How Do Test Takers Interact With Simulation-Based Tasks? A Response-Time Perspective.
    Lee YH; Hao J; Man K; Ou L
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():906. PubMed ID: 31068876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Metacognition and mathematical problem solving in grade 3.
    Desoete A; Roeyers H; Buysse A
    J Learn Disabil; 2001; 34(5):435-49. PubMed ID: 15503592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using confirmatory factor analysis to validate the Chamberlin affective instrument for mathematical problem solving with academically advanced students.
    Chamberlin SA; Moore AD; Parks K
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2017 Sep; 87(3):422-437. PubMed ID: 28401983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comprehending 3D Diagrams: Sketching to Support Spatial Reasoning.
    Gagnier KM; Atit K; Ormand CJ; Shipley TF
    Top Cogn Sci; 2017 Oct; 9(4):883-901. PubMed ID: 27886450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A diagnostic tree model for polytomous responses with multiple strategies.
    Ma W
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 Feb; 72(1):61-82. PubMed ID: 29687453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Achieving meaningful mathematics literacy for students with learning disabilities. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt.
    Goldman SR; Hasselbring TS
    J Learn Disabil; 1997; 30(2):198-208. PubMed ID: 9066280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.