119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34109740)
1. The Manchester procedure combined with laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy by retroperitoneal tunneling.
Seçkin KD; Kadiroğulları P; Kıyak H; Doğan AR; Tapısız ÖL
J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc; 2022 Sep; 23(3):219-221. PubMed ID: 34109740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Suture Sacrohysteropexy: LUSSH Procedure.
Jan H; Ghai V
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019 Feb; 26(2):356-357. PubMed ID: 29631010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse and the Technique Used for Uterine Preservation: A Case Report.
Nishii S; Ishikawa T; Okada Y; Sekizawa A
Cureus; 2024 Feb; 16(2):e54989. PubMed ID: 38550503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laparoscopic suture sacrohysteropexy: A meshless uterine- sparing technique for surgical management of uterine prolapse.
Thanatsis N; Ben Zvi M; Kupelian AS; Vashisht A
Facts Views Vis Obgyn; 2023 Jun; 15(2):171-173. PubMed ID: 37436056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Simplified Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy.
Jan H; Ghai V; Thakar R
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(7):1134. PubMed ID: 29371171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy in a Woman at 12 Weeks' Gestation.
Haliloglu Peker B; Ilter E; Peker H; Celik A; Gursoy A; Gunaldi O
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(7):1146-1147. PubMed ID: 29447856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Manchester Operation: An Effective Treatment for Uterine Prolapse Caused by True Cervical Elongation.
Park YJ; Kong MK; Lee J; Kim EH; Bai SW
Yonsei Med J; 2019 Nov; 60(11):1074-1080. PubMed ID: 31637890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Success rates and outcomes of laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy.
Daniels S; Robson D; Palacz M; Howell S; Nguyen T; Behnia-Willison F
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Apr; 60(2):244-249. PubMed ID: 31840811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Uterine suspension using
Abdelazim IA; Shikanova S; Karimova B; Zhurabekova G; Sarsembayev M; Starchenko T
J Family Med Prim Care; 2019 Jan; 8(1):316-318. PubMed ID: 30911532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A new operation technique for uterine prolapse: Vaginally-assisted laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy.
Sanverdi İ; Kılıççı Ç; Polat M; Özkaya E; Kılıç SG; Dizdar M; Karateke A
Turk J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Sep; 14(3):181-186. PubMed ID: 29085709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Meshless Practical Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy Modification and Long-term Outcomes.
Orhan A; Ozerkan K; Kasapoglu I; Ocakoglu G; Aslan K; Uncu G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(7):1573-1580. PubMed ID: 32135244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Manchester operation - is it time for it to return to our surgical armamentarium in the twenty-first century?
Gold RS; Amir H; Baruch Y; Gordon D; Shimonov M; Groutz A
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Jul; 42(5):1419-1423. PubMed ID: 34985379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic or laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus open sacrohysteropexy for uterus preservation in pelvic organ prolapse.
Paek J; Lee M; Kim BW; Kwon Y
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Apr; 27(4):593-9. PubMed ID: 26514118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Uterus preserving vaginal surgery versus vaginal hysterectomy for correction of female pelvic organ prolapse.
Iliev VN; Andonova IT
Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki); 2014; 35(1):243-7. PubMed ID: 24802202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sacrohysteropexy with synthetic mesh for the management of uterovaginal prolapse.
Leron E; Stanton SL
BJOG; 2001 Jun; 108(6):629-33. PubMed ID: 11426899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficacy and pregnancy outcomes of laparoscopic single sheet mesh sacrohysteropexy.
Pandeva I; Mistry M; Fayyad A
Neurourol Urodyn; 2017 Mar; 36(3):787-793. PubMed ID: 27224927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Manchester procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy in the treatment of uterine prolapse: a review.
Tolstrup CK; Lose G; Klarskov N
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Jan; 28(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 27485234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laparoscopic inguinal ligament suspension: a novel procedure to repair uterine prolapse.
Dai Z; Li H; Shu H; Guan X; Zhang K
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):657-660. PubMed ID: 30361770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: a multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial comparing laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy with vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy (LAVA-trial, study protocol).
van IJsselmuiden MN; Coolen AL; Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Bongers M; van de Pol G; Vollebregt A; Radder CM; Deprest J; van Eijndhoven HW
BMC Womens Health; 2014 Sep; 14():112. PubMed ID: 25231240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus sacrospinous hysteropexy-a multicentre randomised controlled trial (LAVA trial).
van IJsselmuiden MN; van Oudheusden A; Veen J; van de Pol G; Vollebregt A; Radder CM; Housmans S; van Kuijk S; Deprest J; Bongers MY; van Eijndhoven H
BJOG; 2020 Sep; 127(10):1284-1293. PubMed ID: 32267624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
