These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34109902)

  • 1. Development and evaluation of video recordings for the OLSA matrix sentence test.
    Llorach G; Kirschner F; Grimm G; Zokoll MA; Wagener KC; Hohmann V
    Int J Audiol; 2022 Apr; 61(4):311-321. PubMed ID: 34109902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development and evaluation of the Turkish matrix sentence test.
    Zokoll MA; Fidan D; Türkyılmaz D; Hochmuth S; Ergenç İ; Sennaroğlu G; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():51-61. PubMed ID: 26443486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do you hear the noise? The German matrix sentence test with a fixed noise level in subjects with normal hearing and hearing impairment.
    Wardenga N; Batsoulis C; Wagener KC; Brand T; Lenarz T; Maier H
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():71-9. PubMed ID: 26555195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An Italian matrix sentence test for the evaluation of speech intelligibility in noise.
    Puglisi GE; Warzybok A; Hochmuth S; Visentin C; Astolfi A; Prodi N; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():44-50. PubMed ID: 26371592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A standardised test to evaluate audio-visual speech intelligibility in French.
    Le Rhun L; Llorach G; Delmas T; Suied C; Arnal LH; Lazard DS
    Heliyon; 2024 Jan; 10(2):e24750. PubMed ID: 38312568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of the Russian matrix sentence test.
    Warzybok A; Zokoll M; Wardenga N; Ozimek E; Boboshko M; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():35-43. PubMed ID: 25843088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
    Hochmuth S; Jürgens T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Spanish matrix sentence test for assessing speech reception thresholds in noise.
    Hochmuth S; Brand T; Zokoll MA; Castro FZ; Wardenga N; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Jul; 51(7):536-44. PubMed ID: 22537033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of noise type on speech reception thresholds across four languages measured with matrix sentence tests.
    Hochmuth S; Kollmeier B; Brand T; Jürgens T
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():62-70. PubMed ID: 26097982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How much does language proficiency by non-native listeners influence speech audiometric tests in noise?
    Warzybok A; Brand T; Wagener KC; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():88-99. PubMed ID: 26344170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Construction and evaluation of the Mandarin Chinese matrix (CMNmatrix) sentence test for the assessment of speech recognition in noise.
    Hu H; Xi X; Wong LLN; Hochmuth S; Warzybok A; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Nov; 57(11):838-850. PubMed ID: 30178681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The German hearing in noise test with a female talker: development and comparison with German male speech test.
    Mönnich AL; Strieth S; Bohnert A; Ernst BP; Rader T
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Jul; 280(7):3157-3169. PubMed ID: 36635424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Norwegian Hearing in Noise Test for Children.
    Myhrum M; Tvete OE; Heldahl MG; Moen I; Soli SD
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):80-92. PubMed ID: 26462169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of the Cantonese Hearing In Noise Test (CHINT).
    Wong LL; Soli SD
    Ear Hear; 2005 Jun; 26(3):276-89. PubMed ID: 15937409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development and evaluation of the Cantonese matrix sentence test.
    Hu H; Hochmuth S; Man CK; Warzybok A; Kollmeier B; Wong LLN
    Int J Audiol; 2024 Jan; 63(1):8-20. PubMed ID: 36441177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A procedure for measuring auditory and audio-visual speech-reception thresholds for sentences in noise: rationale, evaluation, and recommendations for use.
    MacLeod A; Summerfield Q
    Br J Audiol; 1990 Feb; 24(1):29-43. PubMed ID: 2317599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adaptation of the HINT (hearing in noise test) for adult Canadian Francophone populations.
    Vaillancourt V; Laroche C; Mayer C; Basque C; Nali M; Eriks-Brophy A; Soli SD; Giguère C
    Int J Audiol; 2005 Jun; 44(6):358-69. PubMed ID: 16078731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Matrix sentence intelligibility prediction using an automatic speech recognition system.
    Schädler MR; Warzybok A; Hochmuth S; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():100-7. PubMed ID: 26383042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantifying the contribution of vision to speech perception in noise.
    MacLeod A; Summerfield Q
    Br J Audiol; 1987 May; 21(2):131-41. PubMed ID: 3594015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An Evaluation of Output Signal to Noise Ratio as a Predictor of Cochlear Implant Speech Intelligibility.
    Watkins GD; Swanson BA; Suaning GJ
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):958-968. PubMed ID: 29474218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.