These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Informational masking in hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners: sensation level and decision weights. Alexander JM; Lutfi RA J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Oct; 116(4 Pt 1):2234-47. PubMed ID: 15532655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Upward spread of masking, hearing loss, and speech recognition in young and elderly listeners. Klein AJ; Mills JH; Adkins WY J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Mar; 87(3):1266-71. PubMed ID: 2324393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of cochlear impairment and equivalent-threshold masking on psychoacoustic tuning curves. Florentine M Audiology; 1992; 31(5):241-53. PubMed ID: 1449429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tone-on-tone masking in subjects with normal hearing and with sensorineural hearing loss. Chung DY J Speech Hear Res; 1981 Dec; 24(4):506-13. PubMed ID: 7329047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The relative role of beats and combination tones in determining the shapes of masking patterns: II. Hearing-impaired listeners. Alcántara JI; Moore BC Hear Res; 2002 Mar; 165(1-2):103-16. PubMed ID: 12031520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Informational masking in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. Kidd G; Arbogast TL; Mason CR; Walsh M J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2002 Jun; 3(2):107-19. PubMed ID: 12162362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Upward spread of masking in normal and abnormal ears]. Picard M; Couture-Metz F Audiology; 1985; 24(2):81-91. PubMed ID: 3994593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Masking of tone bursts by modulated noise in normal, noise-masked normal, and hearing-impaired listeners. Humes LE J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Mar; 33(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 2314082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners. Dubno JR; Schaefer AB J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2110-21. PubMed ID: 1597602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of hearing impairment and presentation level on masking period patterns for Schroeder-phase harmonic complexes. Summers V J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Nov; 108(5 Pt 1):2307-17. PubMed ID: 11108371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Masking and partial masking in listeners with a high-frequency hearing loss. Smits JT; Duifhuis H Audiology; 1982; 21(4):310-24. PubMed ID: 7103838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Linearized response growth inferred from growth-of-masking slopes in ears with cochlear hearing loss. Nelson DA; Schroder AC J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Apr; 101(4):2186-201. PubMed ID: 9104021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Spectral contributions to the benefit from spatial separation of speech and noise. Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB; Horwitz AR J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Dec; 45(6):1297-310. PubMed ID: 12546495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Masker phase effects in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: evidence for peripheral compression at low signal frequencies. Oxenham AJ; Dau T J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Oct; 116(4 Pt 1):2248-57. PubMed ID: 15532656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]