These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34110368)
1. Dynamic presentation boosts the Ebbinghaus illusion but reduces the Müller-Lyer and orientation contrast illusions. Takao S; Watanabe K; Cavanagh P J Vis; 2021 Jun; 21(6):4. PubMed ID: 34110368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Superadditivity of the Ebbinghaus and Müller-Lyer illusions depends on the method of comparison used. Foster RM; Franz VH Perception; 2014; 43(8):783-95. PubMed ID: 25549508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Size and direction of distortion in geometric-optical illusions: conciliation between the Müller-Lyer and Titchener configurations. Nemati F Perception; 2009; 38(11):1585-600. PubMed ID: 20120258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assimilation theory, attentive fields, and the Müller-Lyer illusion. Bross M; Blair R; Longtin P Perception; 1978; 7(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 693229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mathematical model for assimilation and contrast in perception of extent. Brigner WL Percept Mot Skills; 1977 Aug; 45(1):103-18. PubMed ID: 905070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An explanation for the Müller-Lyer illusion. Davies TN; Spencer J Percept Mot Skills; 1977 Aug; 45(1):219-24. PubMed ID: 905080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Iris pigmentation and visual-geometric illusions. Coren S; Porac C Perception; 1978; 7(4):473-7. PubMed ID: 704278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Susceptibility to Ebbinghaus and Müller-Lyer illusions in autistic children: a comparison of three different methods. Manning C; Morgan MJ; Allen CTW; Pellicano E Mol Autism; 2017; 8():16. PubMed ID: 28344759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Selective looking and the Müller-Lyer illusion: the effect of changes in the focus of attention on the Müller-Lyer illusion. Goryo K; Robinson JO; Wilson JA Perception; 1984; 13(6):647-54. PubMed ID: 6543943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A novel visual illusion paradigm provides evidence for a general factor of illusion sensitivity and personality correlates. Makowski D; Te AS; Kirk S; Liang NZ; Chen SHA Sci Rep; 2023 Apr; 13(1):6594. PubMed ID: 37087480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of cortical distance on the Ebbinghaus and Delboeuf illusions. Urale PWB; Schwarzkopf DS Perception; 2023 Jul; 52(7):459-483. PubMed ID: 37335155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The combination of target motion and dynamic changes in context greatly enhance visual size illusions. Mruczek REB; Fanelli M; Kelly S; Caplovitz GP Front Hum Neurosci; 2022; 16():959367. PubMed ID: 36188172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Illusions within an Illusion. Deręgowski JB Perception; 2015 Dec; 44(12):1416-21. PubMed ID: 26562856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effectiveness of the ability to form mental images in Müller-Lyer optical illusions. Pérez-Fabello MJ; Campos A Perception; 2023 Aug; 52(8):576-589. PubMed ID: 37384424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Global processing during the Müller-Lyer illusion is distinctively affected by the degree of autistic traits in the typical population. Chouinard PA; Noulty WA; Sperandio I; Landry O Exp Brain Res; 2013 Oct; 230(2):219-31. PubMed ID: 23864047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The creation and reversal of the Müller-Lyer illusion through attentional manipulation. Coren S; Porac C Perception; 1983; 12(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 6646952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]