These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3411045)

  • 1. Intensity discrimination, increment detection, and magnitude estimation for 1-kHz tones.
    Viemeister NF; Bacon SP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Jul; 84(1):172-8. PubMed ID: 3411045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The relation between loudness and intensity difference limens for tones in quiet and noise backgrounds.
    Rankovic CM; Viemeister NF; Fantini DA; Cheesman MF; Uchiyama CL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Jul; 84(1):150-5. PubMed ID: 3411042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intensity discrimination and increment detection in cochlear-implant users.
    Wojtczak M; Donaldson GS; Viemeister NF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jul; 114(1):396-407. PubMed ID: 12880051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Psychometric functions for level discrimination.
    Buus S; Florentine M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Sep; 90(3):1371-80. PubMed ID: 1939901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detection and intensity discrimination of a sinusoid.
    Hanna TE; von Gierke SM; Green DM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Nov; 80(5):1335-40. PubMed ID: 3782610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intensity discrimination of pulsed tones by the goldfish (Carassius auratus).
    Fay RR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):500-2. PubMed ID: 2921423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Loudness adaptation at high frequencies.
    Miśkiewicz A; Scharf B; Hellman R; Meiselman C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Sep; 94(3 Pt 1):1281-6. PubMed ID: 8408968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intensity discrimination as a function of level and frequency and its relation to high-frequency hearing.
    Florentine M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Nov; 74(5):1375-9. PubMed ID: 6643849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intensity discrimination as a function of stimulus level with electric stimulation.
    Nelson DA; Schmitz JL; Donaldson GS; Viemeister NF; Javel E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Oct; 100(4 Pt 1):2393-414. PubMed ID: 8865646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identification variability as a measure of loudness: an application to gender differences.
    Sagi E; D'Alessandro LM; Norwich KH
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2007 Mar; 61(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 17479743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intensity discrimination and increment detection at 16 kHz.
    Bacon SP; Viemeister NF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 May; 95(5 Pt 1):2616-21. PubMed ID: 8207133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Induced loudness reduction as a function of exposure time and signal frequency.
    Wagner E; Scharf B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Feb; 119(2):1012-20. PubMed ID: 16521763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection of pure-tone amplitude modulation as a function of sensation level from 8 to 14 kHz.
    Long GR; Cullen JK
    Hear Res; 1986; 24(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 3771378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. II. Enhancement of auditory-nerve response to masked tones.
    Kawase T; Delgutte B; Liberman MC
    J Neurophysiol; 1993 Dec; 70(6):2533-49. PubMed ID: 8120597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intensity resolution and loudness in high-pass noise.
    Schlauch RS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Apr; 95(4):2171-9. PubMed ID: 8201113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Level discrimination as a function of level for tones from 0.25 to 16 kHz.
    Florentine M; Buus S; Mason CR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 May; 81(5):1528-41. PubMed ID: 3584690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The mid-level hump at 2 kHz.
    Nizami L; Reimer JF; Jesteadt W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Aug; 112(2):642-53. PubMed ID: 12186044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A test of the equal-loudness-ratio hypothesis using cross-modality matching functions.
    Epstein M; Florentine M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Aug; 118(2):907-13. PubMed ID: 16158646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Loudness perception and frequency discrimination in subjects with steeply sloping hearing loss: possible correlates of neural plasticity.
    McDermott HJ; Lech M; Kornblum MS; Irvine DR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Oct; 104(4):2314-25. PubMed ID: 10491696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors affecting the processing of intensity in school-aged children.
    Buss E; Hall JW; Grose JH
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Feb; 56(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 22896044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.