These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34110472)

  • 21. A study of memory functioning in individuals with autism.
    Mottron L; Morasse K; Belleville S
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2001 Feb; 42(2):253-60. PubMed ID: 11280421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Why seemingly more difficult test conditions produce more accurate recognition of semantic prototype words: A recognition memory paradox?
    Jou J; Escamilla EE; Torres AU; Ortiz A; Perez M; Zuniga R
    Conscious Cogn; 2018 Aug; 63():239-253. PubMed ID: 30008339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The properties of retrieval cues constrain the picture superiority effect.
    Weldon MS; Roediger HL; Challis BH
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jan; 17(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 2913461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Differential effects of intrinsic properties of natural scenes and interference mechanisms on recognition processes in long-term visual memory.
    Mikhailova A; Lightfoot S; Santos-Victor J; Coco MI
    Cogn Process; 2024 Feb; 25(1):173-187. PubMed ID: 37831320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Identifying age-invariant and age-limited mechanisms for enhanced memory performance: Insights from self-referential processing in younger and older adults.
    Trelle AN; Henson RN; Simons JS
    Psychol Aging; 2015 Jun; 30(2):324-33. PubMed ID: 25961877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The neural correlates of correctly rejecting lures during memory retrieval: the role of item relatedness.
    Bowman CR; Dennis NA
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Jun; 233(6):1963-75. PubMed ID: 25862563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Prior perceptual processing enhances the effect of emotional arousal on the neural correlates of memory retrieval.
    Dew IT; Ritchey M; LaBar KS; Cabeza R
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2014 Jul; 112():104-13. PubMed ID: 24380867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Presentation duration and false recall for semantic and phonological associates.
    Ballardini N; Yamashita JA; Wallace WP
    Conscious Cogn; 2008 Mar; 17(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 17407823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evidence for adult age-invariance in associative false recognition.
    Pansuwan T; Breuer F; Gazder T; Lau Z; Cueva S; Swanson L; Taylor M; Wilson M; Morcom AM
    Memory; 2020 Feb; 28(2):172-186. PubMed ID: 31868124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Retrieval orientation and the control of recollection.
    Herron JE; Rugg MD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):843-54. PubMed ID: 14511537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The relationship between orienting tasks and the structure of memory traces--evidence from false recognition.
    Parkin AJ
    Br J Psychol; 1983 Feb; 74 (Pt 1)():61-9. PubMed ID: 6831142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dynamic cognitive control of irrelevant sound: Increased task engagement attenuates semantic auditory distraction.
    Marsh JE; Sörqvist P; Hughes RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Oct; 41(5):1462-74. PubMed ID: 26191618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. False memory for orthographically versus semantically similar words in adolescents with dyslexia: a fuzzy-trace theory perspective.
    Obidziński M; Nieznański M
    Ann Dyslexia; 2017 Oct; 67(3):318-332. PubMed ID: 29134480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Lost in distractors: Reduced Autobiographical Memory Specificity and dispersed activation spreading over distractors in working memory.
    Takano K; Moriya J; Raes F
    Behav Res Ther; 2017 Jul; 94():19-35. PubMed ID: 28441521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. False working memories? Semantic distortion in a mere 4 seconds.
    Atkins AS; Reuter-Lorenz PA
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Jan; 36(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 18323064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of encoding variability on rejection of non-corresponding lures: Role of retrieval processes.
    Rollins L; Parks N; Eakins R
    Conscious Cogn; 2023 Apr; 110():103506. PubMed ID: 36989862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Encoding specificity revisited: the role of semantics.
    Hannon B; Craik FI
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2001 Sep; 55(3):231-43. PubMed ID: 11605558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Episodic generation can cause semantic forgetting: retrieval-induced forgetting of false memories.
    Starns JJ; Hicks JL
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Jun; 32(4):602-9. PubMed ID: 15478754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Eye-closure & the retrieval of item-specific information in recognition memory.
    Parker A; Dagnall N
    Conscious Cogn; 2020 Jan; 77():102858. PubMed ID: 31837571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reduced effects of pictorial distinctiveness on false memory following dynamic visual noise.
    Parker A; Kember T; Dagnall N
    Memory; 2017 Jul; 25(6):845-855. PubMed ID: 27637835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.