BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34110488)

  • 1. Efficacy of a robotic stapler on symptomatic anastomotic leakage in robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
    Chen K; Shiomi A; Kagawa H; Hino H; Manabe S; Yamaoka Y; Kato S; Hanaoka M; Saito K; Maeda C; Kojima T; Shioi I; Nanishi K; Tanaka Y; Kasai S
    Surg Today; 2022 Jan; 52(1):120-128. PubMed ID: 34110488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Short-term outcomes associated with the use of a new powered circular stapler for rectal reconstructions: a retrospective study comparing it to manual circular staplers using inverse probability of treatment weight analysis.
    Matsuhashi N; Tajima JY; Yokoi R; Kiyama S; Endo M; Sato Y; Kuno M; Hayashi H; Asai R; Fukada M; Yasufuku I; Tanaka Y; Okumura N; Murase K; Ishihara T; Takahashi T
    BMC Surg; 2023 Oct; 23(1):332. PubMed ID: 37898761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection with Two Planned Stapler Fires.
    Otsuka K; Kimura T; Matsuo T; Fujii H; Yaegashi M; Sato K; Kondo S; Sasaki A
    JSLS; 2019; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 30914830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of symptomatic anastomotic leakage following laparoscopic and open low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis of 1014 consecutive patients.
    Katsuno H; Shiomi A; Ito M; Koide Y; Maeda K; Yatsuoka T; Hase K; Komori K; Minami K; Sakamoto K; Saida Y; Saito N
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Jul; 30(7):2848-56. PubMed ID: 26487228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Risk factors of anastomotic leakage after robotic surgery for low and mid rectal cancer].
    Chen JW; Chang WJ; Zhang ZY; He GD; Feng QY; Zhu DX; Yi T; Lin Q; Wei Y; Xu JM
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):364-369. PubMed ID: 32306604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Control Comparison of the New EndoWrist and Traditional Laparoscopic Staplers for Anterior Rectal Resection with the Da Vinci Xi: A Case Study.
    Guadagni S; Di Franco G; Gianardi D; Palmeri M; Ceccarelli C; Bianchini M; Furbetta N; Caprili G; D'Isidoro C; Moglia A; Melfi F; Buccianti P; Mosca F; Morelli L
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 Dec; 28(12):1422-1427. PubMed ID: 29920142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Incidence of and risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection with intracorporeal rectal transection and double-stapling technique anastomosis for rectal cancer.
    Akiyoshi T; Ueno M; Fukunaga Y; Nagayama S; Fujimoto Y; Konishi T; Kuroyanagi H; Yamaguchi T
    Am J Surg; 2011 Sep; 202(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 21871980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Uni-center, patient-blinded, randomized, 12-month, parallel group, noninferiority study to compare outcomes of 3-row vs 2-row circular staplers for colorectal anastomosis formation after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
    Nekliudov NA; Tsarkov PV; Tulina IA
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jun; 98(24):e15978. PubMed ID: 31192938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rectal tube drainage reduces major anastomotic leakage after minimally invasive rectal cancer surgery.
    Yang CS; Choi GS; Park JS; Park SY; Kim HJ; Choi JI; Han KS
    Colorectal Dis; 2016 Dec; 18(12):O445-O452. PubMed ID: 27611180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laparoscopic surgery may decrease the risk of clinical anastomotic leakage and a nomogram to predict anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer.
    Zheng H; Wu Z; Wu Y; Mo S; Dai W; Liu F; Xu Y; Cai S
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2019 Feb; 34(2):319-328. PubMed ID: 30470941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preventive effect of diverting stoma on anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection with double stapling technique reconstruction applied based on risk stratification.
    Hamabe A; Ito M; Nishigori H; Nishizawa Y; Sasaki T
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2018 Aug; 11(3):220-226. PubMed ID: 29230964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of robotic or laparoscopic stapler in rectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Tejedor P; Sagias F; Flashman K; Kandala NL; Khan J
    J Robot Surg; 2020 Dec; 14(6):829-833. PubMed ID: 32691353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic surgery with the double stapling technique for stage 0/I rectal carcinoma: a subgroup analysis of a multicenter, single-arm phase II trial.
    Tanaka K; Okuda J; Yamamoto S; Ito M; Sakamoto K; Kokuba Y; Yoshimura K; Watanabe M
    Surg Today; 2017 Oct; 47(10):1215-1222. PubMed ID: 28280982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Advantages of using a robotic stapler in rectal cancer surgery.
    Tejedor P; Sagias F; Nock D; Flashman K; Naqvi S; Kandala NL; Khan JS
    J Robot Surg; 2020 Apr; 14(2):365-370. PubMed ID: 31290074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multicenter analysis of risk factors for anastomotic leakage after middle and low rectal cancer resection without diverting stoma: a retrospective study of 319 consecutive patients.
    Zhang W; Lou Z; Liu Q; Meng R; Gong H; Hao L; Liu P; Sun G; Ma J; Zhang W
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 Oct; 32(10):1431-1437. PubMed ID: 28766076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A trinity technique for prevention of low rectal anastomotic leakage in the robotic era.
    Chang W; Liu T; Ren L; He G; Ji M; Jian M; Chen Y; Liang F; Wei Y; Xu J
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Oct; 46(10 Pt B):e47-e54. PubMed ID: 32900608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recurrence of rectal anastomotic leakage following stoma closure: assessment of risk factors.
    Kitaguchi D; Nishizawa Y; Sasaki T; Tsukada Y; Ikeda K; Ito M
    Colorectal Dis; 2019 Nov; 21(11):1304-1311. PubMed ID: 31199545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Management of Low Colorectal Anastomotic Leakage in the Laparoscopic Era: More Than a Decade of Experience.
    Boyce SA; Harris C; Stevenson A; Lumley J; Clark D
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2017 Aug; 60(8):807-814. PubMed ID: 28682966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Analysis on the technical characteristics and clinical efficacy of robotic-assisted intersphincteric resection for patients with low rectal cancer].
    Liu HC; Li C; Zhang F; Wang XS; Zhang C; Luo HX; Song J; Yu PW; Tang B
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1137-1143. PubMed ID: 31874529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Use of Robotic and Laparoscopic Surgical Stapling Devices During Minimally Invasive Colon and Rectal Surgery: A Comparison.
    Holzmacher JL; Luka S; Aziz M; Amdur RL; Agarwal S; Obias V
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2017 Feb; 27(2):151-155. PubMed ID: 27893300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.