These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34110494)

  • 1. Six-year clinical evaluation of bulk-fill and nanofill resin composite restorations.
    Yazici AR; Kutuk ZB; Ergin E; Karahan S; Antonson SA
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jan; 26(1):417-426. PubMed ID: 34110494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Thirty-Six-Month Clinical Comparison of Bulk Fill and Nanofill Composite Restorations.
    Yazici AR; Antonson SA; Kutuk ZB; Ergin E
    Oper Dent; 2017; 42(5):478-485. PubMed ID: 28581919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative evaluation of different adhesive strategies of a universal adhesive in class II bulk-fill restorations: A 48-month randomized controlled trial.
    Yazici AR; Uslu Tekce A; Kutuk ZB
    J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103921. PubMed ID: 34896442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 24-Month Clinical Evaluation of Different Bulk-Fill Restorative Resins in Class II Restorations.
    Guney T; Yazici AR
    Oper Dent; 2020; 45(2):123-133. PubMed ID: 31693438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A randomized, prospective clinical study evaluating effectiveness of a bulk-fill composite resin, a conventional composite resin and a reinforced glass ionomer in Class II cavities: one-year results.
    Balkaya H; Arslan S; Pala K
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2019; 27():e20180678. PubMed ID: 31596369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-year clinical evaluation of different restorative resins in class I restorations.
    Yazici AR; Ustunkol I; Ozgunaltay G; Dayangac B
    Oper Dent; 2014; 39(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 24754716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical evaluation of thermo-viscous and sonic fill-activated bulk fill composite restorations.
    Morsy KE; Salama MM; Genaid TM
    Am J Dent; 2023 Apr; 36(2):81-85. PubMed ID: 37076297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Marginal Integrity of Bulk Versus Incremental Fill Class II Composite Restorations.
    Al-Harbi F; Kaisarly D; Bader D; El Gezawi M
    Oper Dent; 2016; 41(2):146-56. PubMed ID: 26266653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 5-year clinical performance of posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations: A double-blind randomized controlled trial.
    Loguercio AD; Ñaupari-Villasante R; Gutierrez MF; Gonzalez MI; Reis A; Heintze SD
    Dent Mater; 2023 Dec; 39(12):1159-1168. PubMed ID: 37839995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of different placement techniques on the clinical success of bulk-fill resin composites placed in Class II cavities: a 4-year randomized controlled clinical study.
    Çakır Kılınç NN; Demirbuğa S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Feb; 27(2):541-557. PubMed ID: 36222961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Thirty-six-month clinical evaluation of different adhesive strategies of a universal adhesive.
    Atalay C; Ozgunaltay G; Yazici AR
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Apr; 24(4):1569-1578. PubMed ID: 31468262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. One-year evaluation of a new restorative glass ionomer cement for the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions in patients with systemic diseases: a randomized, clinical trial.
    Oz FD; Meral E; Ergİn E; Gurgan S
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2020; 28():e20200311. PubMed ID: 33111883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Two-year Clinical Comparison of Three Different Restorative Materials in Class II Cavities.
    Balkaya H; Arslan S
    Oper Dent; 2020; 45(1):E32-E42. PubMed ID: 31738696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marginal quality of posterior microhybrid resin composite restorations applied using two polymerisation protocols: 5-year randomised split mouth trial.
    Barabanti N; Gagliani M; Roulet JF; Testori T; Ozcan M; Cerutti A
    J Dent; 2013 May; 41(5):436-42. PubMed ID: 23454329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Randomized 36-month follow-up of posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations.
    Loguercio AD; Rezende M; Gutierrez MF; Costa TF; Armas-Vega A; Reis A
    J Dent; 2019 Jun; 85():93-102. PubMed ID: 31100332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Marginal Gap Formation in Approximal "Bulk Fill" Resin Composite Restorations After Artificial Ageing.
    Peutzfeldt A; Mühlebach S; Lussi A; Flury S
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(2):180-189. PubMed ID: 29148914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Randomized prospective clinical trial of class II restorations using flowable bulk-fill resin composites: 4-year follow-up.
    Endo Hoshino IA; Fraga Briso AL; Bueno Esteves LM; Dos Santos PH; Meira Borghi Frascino S; Fagundes TC
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Sep; 26(9):5697-5710. PubMed ID: 35556174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Randomized 3-year clinical evaluation of Class I and II posterior resin restorations placed with a bulk-fill resin composite and a one-step self-etching adhesive.
    van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
    J Adhes Dent; 2015 Feb; 17(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 25625133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of lesion size on the 30-month clinical performance of restorations with bulk fill and a regular nanofilled resin composite in noncarious cervical lesions.
    Correia AMO; Jurema ALB; Bresciani E; Caneppele TMF
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jun; 27(6):3083-3093. PubMed ID: 36763143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Could bulk fill glass hybrid restorative materials replace composite resins in treating permanent teeth? A randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Uyumaz FÜ; Abaklı İnci M; Özer H
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 May; 36(5):702-709. PubMed ID: 38108583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.