These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34110577)

  • 1. Machine learning models for classification tasks related to drug safety.
    Rácz A; Bajusz D; Miranda-Quintana RA; Héberger K
    Mol Divers; 2021 Aug; 25(3):1409-1424. PubMed ID: 34110577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction of hERG potassium channel blockage using ensemble learning methods and molecular fingerprints.
    Liu M; Zhang L; Li S; Yang T; Liu L; Zhao J; Liu H
    Toxicol Lett; 2020 Oct; 332():88-96. PubMed ID: 32629073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. ADMET Evaluation in Drug Discovery. 16. Predicting hERG Blockers by Combining Multiple Pharmacophores and Machine Learning Approaches.
    Wang S; Sun H; Liu H; Li D; Li Y; Hou T
    Mol Pharm; 2016 Aug; 13(8):2855-66. PubMed ID: 27379394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do we need different machine learning algorithms for QSAR modeling? A comprehensive assessment of 16 machine learning algorithms on 14 QSAR data sets.
    Wu Z; Zhu M; Kang Y; Leung EL; Lei T; Shen C; Jiang D; Wang Z; Cao D; Hou T
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 Jul; 22(4):. PubMed ID: 33313673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bioactivity Comparison across Multiple Machine Learning Algorithms Using over 5000 Datasets for Drug Discovery.
    Lane TR; Foil DH; Minerali E; Urbina F; Zorn KM; Ekins S
    Mol Pharm; 2021 Jan; 18(1):403-415. PubMed ID: 33325717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of QSAR Equations for Virtual Screening.
    Spiegel J; Senderowitz H
    Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Oct; 21(21):. PubMed ID: 33105703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Machine Learning for In Silico ADMET Prediction.
    Jia L; Gao H
    Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2390():447-460. PubMed ID: 34731482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictive QSAR modeling for the successful predictions of the ADMET properties of candidate drug molecules.
    Khan MT; Sylte I
    Curr Drug Discov Technol; 2007 Oct; 4(3):141-9. PubMed ID: 17985997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. TSSF-hERG: A machine-learning-based hERG potassium channel-specific scoring function for chemical cardiotoxicity prediction.
    Meng J; Zhang L; Wang L; Li S; Xie D; Zhang Y; Liu H
    Toxicology; 2021 Dec; 464():153018. PubMed ID: 34757159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. ADMET Evaluation in Drug Discovery. 18. Reliable Prediction of Chemical-Induced Urinary Tract Toxicity by Boosting Machine Learning Approaches.
    Lei T; Sun H; Kang Y; Zhu F; Liu H; Zhou W; Wang Z; Li D; Li Y; Hou T
    Mol Pharm; 2017 Nov; 14(11):3935-3953. PubMed ID: 29037046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Machine learning approaches for predicting compounds that interact with therapeutic and ADMET related proteins.
    Li H; Yap CW; Ung CY; Xue Y; Li ZR; Han LY; Lin HH; Chen YZ
    J Pharm Sci; 2007 Nov; 96(11):2838-60. PubMed ID: 17786989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Machine Learning-Based Modeling of Drug Toxicity.
    Lu J; Lu D; Fu Z; Zheng M; Luo X
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1754():247-264. PubMed ID: 29536448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Review of machine learning and deep learning models for toxicity prediction.
    Guo W; Liu J; Dong F; Song M; Li Z; Khan MKH; Patterson TA; Hong H
    Exp Biol Med (Maywood); 2023 Nov; 248(21):1952-1973. PubMed ID: 38057999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recent uses of topological indices in the development of in silico ADMET models.
    Votano JR
    Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2005 Jan; 8(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 15679169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Generation of a set of simple, interpretable ADMET rules of thumb.
    Gleeson MP
    J Med Chem; 2008 Feb; 51(4):817-34. PubMed ID: 18232648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In silico machine learning methods in drug development.
    Dobchev DA; Pillai GG; Karelson M
    Curr Top Med Chem; 2014; 14(16):1913-22. PubMed ID: 25262800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predictive toxicology modeling: protocols for exploring hERG classification and Tetrahymena pyriformis end point predictions.
    Su BH; Tu YS; Esposito EX; Tseng YJ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Jun; 52(6):1660-73. PubMed ID: 22642982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. ADMET Evaluation in Drug Discovery. Part 17: Development of Quantitative and Qualitative Prediction Models for Chemical-Induced Respiratory Toxicity.
    Lei T; Chen F; Liu H; Sun H; Kang Y; Li D; Li Y; Hou T
    Mol Pharm; 2017 Jul; 14(7):2407-2421. PubMed ID: 28595388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Artificial Neural Networks in Computer-Aided Drug Design: An Overview of Recent Advances.
    Cheirdaris DG
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2020; 1194():115-125. PubMed ID: 32468528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Targeting HIV/HCV Coinfection Using a Machine Learning-Based Multiple Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (Multiple QSAR) Method.
    Wei Y; Li W; Du T; Hong Z; Lin J
    Int J Mol Sci; 2019 Jul; 20(14):. PubMed ID: 31336592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.