These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

633 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34110684)

  • 1. Meta-analysis comparing valve-in-valve TAVR and redo-SAVR in patients with degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valve.
    Saleem S; Ullah W; Syed MA; Megaly M; Thalambedu N; Younas S; Zahid S; Alam M; Virani SS; Verma DR; Abdul-Waheed M; Fischman DL
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Nov; 98(5):940-947. PubMed ID: 34110684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus redo surgical valve replacement for degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valve: An updated meta-analysis comparing midterm outcomes.
    Thandra A; Abusnina W; Jhand A; Shaikh K; Bansal R; Pajjuru VS; Al-Abdouh A; Kanmanthareddy A; Alla VM
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Jun; 97(7):1481-1488. PubMed ID: 33580743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transcatheter or Surgical Replacement for Failed Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves.
    Tran JH; Itagaki S; Zeng Q; Leon MB; O'Gara PT; Mack MJ; Gillinov AM; El-Hamamsy I; Tang GHL; Mikami T; Bagiella E; Moskowitz AJ; Adams DH; Gelijns AC; Borger MA; Egorova NN
    JAMA Cardiol; 2024 Jul; 9(7):631-639. PubMed ID: 38776106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transcatheter valve-in-valve versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement for the treatment of degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valve: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Tam DY; Vo TX; Wijeysundera HC; Dvir D; Friedrich JO; Fremes SE
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Dec; 92(7):1404-1411. PubMed ID: 30024102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Redo-aortic valve replacement in prior stentless prosthetic aortic valves: Transcatheter versus surgical approach.
    Choi CH; Cao K; Malaver D; Kincaid EH; Lata A; Kon N; Belford PM; Gandhi SK; Applegate RJ; Zhao DXM
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Jan; 99(1):181-192. PubMed ID: 34402588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two-Year Outcomes of Valve-in-Valve Using New-Generation Transcatheter Devices Compared With Redo-SAVR.
    Nagasaka T; Koren O; Patel V; Naami R; Naami E; Shechter A; Kohan S; Allison Z; Lerner A; Cheng DE; Chakravarty T; Cheng W; Jilaihawi H; Ishii H; Nakamura M; Makkar RR
    Am J Cardiol; 2023 Nov; 207():380-389. PubMed ID: 37778227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: An Updated Meta-Analysis.
    Sá MPBO; Van den Eynde J; Simonato M; Cavalcanti LRP; Doulamis IP; Weixler V; Kampaktsis PN; Gallo M; Laforgia PL; Zhigalov K; Ruhparwar A; Weymann A; Pibarot P; Clavel MA
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Jan; 14(2):211-220. PubMed ID: 33478639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Isolated Redo Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Valve Replacement.
    Patel PM; Chiou E; Cao Y; Binongo J; Guyton RA; Leshnower B; Grubb KJ; Chen EP
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2021 Aug; 112(2):539-545. PubMed ID: 33129775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus isolated redo surgical aortic valve replacement.
    Yousef S; Serna-Gallegos D; Iyanna N; Kliner D; Brown JA; Toma C; Makani A; West D; Wang Y; Thoma FW; Ahmad D; Yoon P; Chu D; Kaczorowski D; Bonatti J; Sultan I
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2024 Oct; 168(4):1003-1010. PubMed ID: 37399942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ahmed A; Levy KH
    J Card Surg; 2021 Jul; 36(7):2486-2495. PubMed ID: 33797799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Meta-Analysis of Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Implantation Versus Redo Aortic Valve Surgery for Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Dysfunction.
    Neupane S; Singh H; Lämmer J; Othman H; Yamasaki H; Rosman HS; Bossone E; Mehta RH; Eggebrecht H
    Am J Cardiol; 2018 Jun; 121(12):1593-1600. PubMed ID: 29776652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Meta-Analysis of Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Redo-surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Failed Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve.
    Al-Abcha A; Saleh Y; Boumegouas M; Prasad R; Herzallah K; Baloch ZQ; Abdelkarim O; Rayamajhi S; Abela GS
    Am J Cardiol; 2021 May; 146():74-81. PubMed ID: 33529615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Aortic Valve Replacement as an Alternative to Surgical Re-Replacement.
    Deharo P; Bisson A; Herbert J; Lacour T; Etienne CS; Porto A; Theron A; Collart F; Bourguignon T; Cuisset T; Fauchier L
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2020 Aug; 76(5):489-499. PubMed ID: 32731926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Renal outcomes in valve-in-valve transcatheter versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Arjomandi Rad A; Naruka V; Vardanyan R; Salmasi MY; Tasoudis PT; Kendall S; Casula R; Athanasiou T
    J Card Surg; 2022 Nov; 37(11):3743-3753. PubMed ID: 36040611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Meta-analysis of Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Takagi H; Mitta S; Ando T
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2019 Jun; 67(4):243-250. PubMed ID: 30114716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Early and Midterm Clinical Outcomes of Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Implantation Versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Bioprosthetic Valve Degeneration: Two Faces of the Same Medal.
    Dokollari A; Cameli M; Mandoli GE; Kalra DS; Poston R; Coku L; Pernoci M; Miri M; Bonacchi M; Gelsomino S
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2021 Nov; 35(11):3223-3231. PubMed ID: 34175205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Redo-Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Aortic Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Nasir MM; Ikram A; Usman M; Sarwar J; Ahmed J; Hamza M; Farhan SA; Siddiqi R; Qadar LT; Shah SR; Khalid MR; Memon RS; Hameed I
    Am J Cardiol; 2024 Aug; 225():151-159. PubMed ID: 38723857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of in-hospital outcomes and readmissions for valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement vs. reoperative surgical aortic valve replacement: a contemporary assessment of real-world outcomes.
    Hirji SA; Percy ED; Zogg CK; Malarczyk A; Harloff MT; Yazdchi F; Kaneko T
    Eur Heart J; 2020 Aug; 41(29):2747-2755. PubMed ID: 32445575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Aortic Regurgitation, Time to Aortic Valve Reintervention, and Mortality in Degenerated Trifecta Versus Non-Trifecta Bioprosthesis.
    Abbas AE; Madanat L; Khalili H; Mando R; Kheyrbek M; Chandra R; Niroula S; Hanson I; Dixon S; Renard B; Bloomingdale R; Cami E; Pridham B; Altshuler J; Kindzelski B; Fazzalari F; Shannon F; Vivacqua A
    Am J Cardiol; 2024 Jun; 220():49-55. PubMed ID: 38580038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Valve in valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation (ViV-TAVI) versus redo-Surgical aortic valve replacement (redo-SAVR): A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Nalluri N; Atti V; Munir AB; Karam B; Patel NJ; Kumar V; Vemula P; Edla S; Asti D; Paturu A; Gayam S; Spagnola J; Barsoum E; Maniatis GA; Tamburrino F; Kandov R; Lafferty J; Kliger C
    J Interv Cardiol; 2018 Oct; 31(5):661-671. PubMed ID: 29781182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.