These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34110873)
1. Negotiating with parents: Attorney practices in the juvenile plea bargain process. Fountain EN; Woolard J Law Hum Behav; 2021 Apr; 45(2):112-123. PubMed ID: 34110873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. COVID-19 exacerbates existing system factors that disadvantage defendants: Findings from a national survey of defense attorneys. Daftary-Kapur T; Henderson KS; Zottoli TM Law Hum Behav; 2021 Apr; 45(2):81-96. PubMed ID: 34110871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk assessment in sentencing and plea bargaining: The roles of prosecutors and defense attorneys. Monahan J; Metz A; Garrett BL; Jakubow A Behav Sci Law; 2020 Jan; 38(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 31797449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Guilty plea hearings in juvenile and criminal court. Redlich AD; Domagalski K; Woestehoff SA; Dezember A; Quas JA Law Hum Behav; 2022 Oct; 46(5):337-352. PubMed ID: 36227319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Virginia Alford plea-takers experience harsher outcomes than traditional plea-takers. Dezember A; Redlich AD Law Hum Behav; 2024 Aug; 48(4):262-280. PubMed ID: 39325405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An offer you cannot refuse: Plea offer size affects innocent but not guilty defendants' perceptions of voluntariness. Fessinger MB; Kovera MB Law Hum Behav; 2023 Dec; 47(6):619-633. PubMed ID: 38127547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Valid or voodoo? A qualitative study of attorney perceptions of risk assessment in sentencing and plea bargaining. Metz A; Monahan J; Siebert L; Garrett B J Community Psychol; 2020 Aug; 48(6):2053-2068. PubMed ID: 32667056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Limitations on the Ability to Negotiate Justice: Attorney Perspectives on Guilt, Innocence, and Legal Advice in the Current Plea System. Helm RK; Reyna VF; Franz AA; Novick RZ; Dincin S; Cort AE Psychol Crime Law; 2018; 24(9):915-934. PubMed ID: 30745792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Content and comprehensibility of juvenile and adult tender-of-plea forms: implications for knowing, intelligent, and voluntary guilty pleas. Redlich AD; Bonventre CL Law Hum Behav; 2015 Apr; 39(2):162-76. PubMed ID: 25528381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Defense attorney plea recommendations and client race: does zealous representation apply equally to all? Edkins VA Law Hum Behav; 2011 Oct; 35(5):413-25. PubMed ID: 21103915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Plea bargaining recommendations by criminal defense attorneys: evidence strength, potential sentence, and defendant preference. Kramer GM; Wolbransky M; Heilbrun K Behav Sci Law; 2007; 25(4):573-85. PubMed ID: 17486632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Attorneys' experiences, perceptions, and plea recommendations in child sexual abuse cases. Fessinger MB; McAuliff BD; Aronson E; McWilliams K Law Hum Behav; 2024 Feb; 48(1):13-32. PubMed ID: 38573702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The psychology of defendant plea decision making. Redlich AD; Bibas S; Edkins VA; Madon S Am Psychol; 2017; 72(4):339-352. PubMed ID: 28481581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. To plead or not to plead: A comparison of juvenile and adult true and false plea decisions. Redlich AD; Shteynberg RV Law Hum Behav; 2016 Dec; 40(6):611-625. PubMed ID: 27348715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Toward a method for evaluating court actor influences on plea negotiations: A preliminary exploration of public defenders. Metcalfe C Behav Sci Law; 2021 Jun; 39(3):345-357. PubMed ID: 34031905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Homelessness and pretrial detention predict unfavorable outcomes in the plea bargaining process. Davis RW Law Hum Behav; 2022 Jun; 46(3):201-213. PubMed ID: 35604706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Developing a model of guilty plea decision-making: Fuzzy-trace theory, gist, and categorical boundaries. Zottoli TM; Helm RK; Edkins VA; Bixter MT Law Hum Behav; 2023 Jun; 47(3):403-421. PubMed ID: 37326548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. From whose perspective? Differences between actors and observers in determining the voluntariness of guilty pleas. Fessinger MB; Kovera MB Law Hum Behav; 2022 Oct; 46(5):353-371. PubMed ID: 36227320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Innocence in the shadow of COVID-19: Plea decision making during a pandemic. Wilford MM; Zimmerman DM; Yan S; Sutherland KT J Exp Psychol Appl; 2021 Dec; 27(4):739-750. PubMed ID: 34138621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]