133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34110874)
1. Don't know responding in young maltreated children: The effects of wh- questions type and enhanced interview instructions.
McWilliams K; Williams S; Stolzenberg SN; Evans AD; Lyon TD
Law Hum Behav; 2021 Apr; 45(2):124-137. PubMed ID: 34110874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effects of promising to tell the truth, the putative confession, and recall and recognition questions on maltreated and non-maltreated children's disclosure of a minor transgression.
Quas JA; Stolzenberg SN; Lyon TD
J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Feb; 166():266-279. PubMed ID: 28950167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An examination of "don't know" responses in forensic interviews with children.
Earhart B; La Rooy DJ; Brubacher SP; Lamb ME
Behav Sci Law; 2014; 32(6):746-61. PubMed ID: 25424612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An evaluation of intraverbal training to generate socially appropriate responses to novel questions.
Ingvarsson ET; Tiger JH; Hanley GP; Stephenson KM
J Appl Behav Anal; 2007; 40(3):411-29. PubMed ID: 17970257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Suppositional Wh-Questions About Perceptions, Conversations, and actions are More Productive than Paired Yes-No Questions when Questioning Maltreated Children.
Henderson HM; Lundon GM; Lyon TD
Child Maltreat; 2023 Feb; 28(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 35025692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dunno if you've any plans for the future: medical student indirect questioning in simulated oncology interviews.
Bourquin C; Stiefel F; Berney A; Singy P
BMC Med Educ; 2012 Mar; 12():8. PubMed ID: 22385555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A meta-analysis of differences in children's reports of single and repeated events.
Woiwod DM; Fitzgerald RJ; Sheahan CL; Price HL; Connolly DA
Law Hum Behav; 2019 Feb; 43(1):99-116. PubMed ID: 30570277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Helping children correctly say "I don't know" to unanswerable questions.
Waterman AH; Blades M
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2011 Dec; 17(4):396-405. PubMed ID: 22059954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Effects of Secret Instructions and Yes/no Questions on Maltreated and Non-maltreated Children's Reports of a Minor Transgression.
Ahern EC; Stolzenberg SN; McWilliams K; Lyon TD
Behav Sci Law; 2016 Nov; 34(6):784-802. PubMed ID: 28229484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Children's Signaling of Incomprehension: The Diagnosticity of Practice Questions During Interview Instructions.
Henderson HM; Lyon TD
Child Maltreat; 2021 Feb; 26(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 33176442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interviewing preschoolers: comparisons of yes/no and wh- questions.
Peterson C; Dowden C; Tobin J
Law Hum Behav; 1999 Oct; 23(5):539-55. PubMed ID: 10487148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Therapists' continuations following I don't know-responses of adolescents in psychotherapy.
Jager M; Huiskes M; Metselaar J; Knorth EJ; De Winter AF; Reijneveld SA
Patient Educ Couns; 2016 Nov; 99(11):1778-1784. PubMed ID: 27247134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Developmental differences in children's learning and use of forensic ground rules during an interview about an experienced event.
Brown DA; Lewis CN; Lamb ME; Gwynne J; Kitto O; Stairmand M
Dev Psychol; 2019 Aug; 55(8):1626-1639. PubMed ID: 31192645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Children's performance on ground rules questions: implications for forensic interviewing.
Dickinson JJ; Brubacher SP; Poole DA
Law Hum Behav; 2015 Feb; 39(1):87-97. PubMed ID: 25642973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Young children's difficulty with indirect speech acts: implications for questioning child witnesses.
Evans AD; Stolzenberg SN; Lee K; Lyon TD
Behav Sci Law; 2014; 32(6):775-88. PubMed ID: 25393547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Effects of Practice on Children's Ability to Apply Ground Rules in a Narrative Interview.
Danby MC; Brubacher SP; Sharman SJ; Powell MB
Behav Sci Law; 2015 Aug; 33(4):446-58. PubMed ID: 26294382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interpreting "I don't know" use by persons living with dementia in Mini-Mental State Examinations.
Hesson AM; Pichler H
Patient Educ Couns; 2016 Sep; 99(9):1534-41. PubMed ID: 27522941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pseudotemporal Invitations: 6- to 9-year-Old Maltreated Children's Tendency to Misinterpret Invitations Referencing "Time" as Solely Requesting Conventional Temporal Information.
McWilliams K; Williams S; Henderson HM; Evans AD; Lyon TD
Child Maltreat; 2023 May; 28(2):265-274. PubMed ID: 35607755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Effects of the Hypothetical Putative Confession and Negatively Valenced Yes/No Questions on Maltreated and Nonmaltreated Children's Disclosure of a Minor Transgression.
Stolzenberg SN; McWilliams K; Lyon TD
Child Maltreat; 2017 May; 22(2):167-173. PubMed ID: 27753611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The strategic regulation of children's memory performance and suggestibility.
Roebers CM; Schneider W
J Exp Child Psychol; 2005 May; 91(1):24-44. PubMed ID: 15814094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
