These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34110875)

  • 1. Eyewitnesses' free-report verbal confidence statements are diagnostic of accuracy.
    Smalarz L; Yang Y; Wells GL
    Law Hum Behav; 2021 Apr; 45(2):138-151. PubMed ID: 34110875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pre-identification confidence is related to eyewitness lineup identification accuracy across heterogeneous encoding conditions.
    Molinaro PF; Charman SD; Wylie K
    Law Hum Behav; 2021 Dec; 45(6):524-541. PubMed ID: 34661424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The language of accurate and inaccurate eyewitnesses.
    Seale-Carlisle TM; Grabman JH; Dodson CS
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Jun; 151(6):1283-1305. PubMed ID: 34855444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing Verbal Eyewitness Confidence Statements Using Natural Language Processing.
    Greenspan RL; Lyman A; Heaton P
    Psychol Sci; 2024 Mar; 35(3):277-287. PubMed ID: 38376954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing human evaluations of eyewitness statements to a machine learning classifier under pristine and suboptimal lineup administration procedures.
    Grabman JH; Dobbins IG; Dodson CS
    Cognition; 2024 Jul; 251():105876. PubMed ID: 39004009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Witnessing-condition information differentially affects evaluations of high- and moderate-confidence eyewitness identifications.
    Lebensfeld TC; Smalarz L
    Cognition; 2024 Sep; 250():105841. PubMed ID: 38852371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The importance of decision bias for predicting eyewitness lineup choices: toward a Lineup Skills Test.
    Baldassari MJ; Kantner J; Lindsay DS
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2019 Jan; 4(1):2. PubMed ID: 30693377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The information gained from witnesses' responses to an initial "blank" lineup.
    Palmer MA; Brewer N; Weber N
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Oct; 36(5):439-47. PubMed ID: 22468758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distorted retrospective eyewitness reports as functions of feedback and delay.
    Wells GL; Olson EA; Charman SD
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2003 Mar; 9(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 12710837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can eyewitnesses correct for external influences on their lineup identifications? The actual/counterfactual assessment paradigm.
    Charman SD; Wells GL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Mar; 14(1):5-20. PubMed ID: 18377163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mistaken eyewitness identification rates increase when either witnessing or testing conditions get worse.
    Smith AM; Wilford MM; Quigley-McBride A; Wells GL
    Law Hum Behav; 2019 Aug; 43(4):358-368. PubMed ID: 31144829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Context influences interpretation of eyewitness confidence statements.
    Cash DK; Lane SM
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Apr; 41(2):180-190. PubMed ID: 27598562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lineup administrators' expectations: their impact on eyewitness confidence.
    Garrioch L; Brimacombe CA
    Law Hum Behav; 2001 Jun; 25(3):299-315. PubMed ID: 11480805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Postidentification feedback affects subsequent eyewitness identification performance.
    Palmer MA; Brewer N; Weber N
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2010 Dec; 16(4):387-98. PubMed ID: 21198255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reasons to Doubt the Reliability of Eyewitness Memory: Commentary on Wixted, Mickes, and Fisher (2018).
    Wade KA; Nash RA; Lindsay DS
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2018 May; 13(3):339-342. PubMed ID: 29716452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of disguise on identification decisions and confidence with simultaneous and sequential lineups.
    Mansour JK; Beaudry JL; Bertrand MI; Kalmet N; Melsom EI; Lindsay RCL
    Law Hum Behav; 2020 Dec; 44(6):502-515. PubMed ID: 33444064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retrieval effort cues predict eyewitness accuracy.
    Lindholm T; Jönsson FU; Liuzza MT
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2018 Dec; 24(4):534-542. PubMed ID: 30024208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Witnessing-condition heterogeneity and witnesses' versus investigators' confidence in the accuracy of witnesses' identification decisions.
    Lindsay DS; Nilsen E; Read JD
    Law Hum Behav; 2000 Dec; 24(6):685-97. PubMed ID: 11105479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Eyewitness confidence and decision time reflect identification accuracy in actual police lineups.
    Quigley-McBride A; Wells GL
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Apr; 47(2):333-347. PubMed ID: 36757968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The damaging effect of confirming feedback on the relation between eyewitness certainty and identification accuracy.
    Bradfield AL; Wells GL; Olson EA
    J Appl Psychol; 2002 Feb; 87(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 11916205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.