These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34111798)

  • 21. Comparison of the 10-year outcomes of cemented and cementless unicompartmental knee replacements: data from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man.
    Mohammad HR; Matharu GS; Judge A; Murray DW
    Acta Orthop; 2020 Feb; 91(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 31635503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Twelve-Year Outcomes of an Oxinium Total Knee Replacement Compared with the Same Cobalt-Chromium Design: An Analysis of 17,577 Prostheses from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Vertullo CJ; Lewis PL; Graves S; Kelly L; Lorimer M; Myers P
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 Feb; 99(4):275-283. PubMed ID: 28196029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Mid- to Long-Term Outcomes of the Lateral Domed Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement: An Analysis From the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland, and the Isle of Man.
    Mohammad HR; Matharu GS; Judge A; Murray DW
    J Arthroplasty; 2021 Jan; 36(1):107-111. PubMed ID: 32773270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of hospital case volume on re-revision following revision total knee arthroplasty.
    Yapp LZ; Walmsley PJ; Moran M; Clarke JV; Simpson AHRW; Scott CEH
    Bone Joint J; 2021 Apr; 103-B(4):602-609. PubMed ID: 33789471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. New surgical instrumentation reduces the revision rate of unicompartmental knee replacement: A propensity score matched comparison of 15,906 knees from the National Joint Registry.
    Mohammad HR; Matharu GS; Judge A; Murray DW
    Knee; 2020 Jun; 27(3):993-1002. PubMed ID: 32115338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mid-term equivalent survival of medial and lateral unicondylar knee replacement: an analysis of data from a National Joint Registry.
    Baker PN; Jameson SS; Deehan DJ; Gregg PJ; Porter M; Tucker K
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Dec; 94(12):1641-8. PubMed ID: 23188905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Use of National Joint Registries to Evaluate a New Knee Arthroplasty Design.
    Vasarhelyi EM; Petis SM
    J Arthroplasty; 2020 Feb; 35(2):413-416. PubMed ID: 31629622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Revision for unexplained pain following unicompartmental and total knee replacement.
    Baker PN; Petheram T; Avery PJ; Gregg PJ; Deehan DJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Sep; 94(17):e126. PubMed ID: 22992855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Outcome of revision UKR to TKR when compared to a matched group of TKR of same total arthroplasty lifespan.
    Jonas SC; Jermin P; Howells N; Porteous A; Murray J; Robinson J
    Knee; 2019 Mar; 26(2):400-404. PubMed ID: 30792107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Improvements in networking processes for hip or knee revision arthroplasty: a silver lining of the COVID-19 pandemic.
    Chatterji U; Puttock D; Kheiran A; Sandean D; Mundy G; Menon D; Brown A
    Hip Int; 2024 Mar; 34(2):168-173. PubMed ID: 37705235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Patellar resurfacing during primary total knee replacement is associated with a lower risk of revision surgery.
    Hunt LP; Matharu GS; Blom AW; Howard PW; Wilkinson JM; Whitehouse MR
    Bone Joint J; 2021 May; 103-B(5):864-871. PubMed ID: 33934661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A critique of revision rate as an outcome measure: re-interpretation of knee joint registry data.
    Goodfellow JW; O'Connor JJ; Murray DW
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Dec; 92(12):1628-31. PubMed ID: 21119165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cost-effectiveness of unicompartmental compared with total knee replacement: a population-based study using data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.
    Burn E; Liddle AD; Hamilton TW; Judge A; Pandit HG; Murray DW; Pinedo-Villanueva R
    BMJ Open; 2018 Apr; 8(4):e020977. PubMed ID: 29706598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Major Aseptic Revision Following Total Knee Replacement: A Study of 478,081 Total Knee Replacements from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Jorgensen NB; McAuliffe M; Orschulok T; Lorimer MF; de Steiger R
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2019 Feb; 101(4):302-310. PubMed ID: 30801369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Revision knee complexity classification (RKCC).
    Phillips JRA; Murray J; Porteous AJ; Morgan-Jones R; Toms AD
    Knee; 2020 Oct; 27(5):1684-1687. PubMed ID: 32917494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Does laminar airflow make a difference to the infection rates for lower limb arthroplasty: a study using the National Joint Registry and local surgical site infection data for two hospitals with and without laminar airflow.
    Singh S; Reddy S; Shrivastava R
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2017 Feb; 27(2):261-265. PubMed ID: 27687918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Demographic and geographical variability in physiotherapy provision following hip and knee replacement. An analysis from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man.
    Smith TO; Dainty JR; Clark EM; Whitehouse MR; Price AJ; MacGregor AJ
    Physiotherapy; 2020 Mar; 106():1-11. PubMed ID: 32026841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. International comparative evaluation of fixed-bearing non-posterior-stabilized and posterior-stabilized total knee replacements.
    Comfort T; Baste V; Froufe MA; Namba R; Bordini B; Robertsson O; Cafri G; Paxton E; Sedrakyan A; Graves S
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Dec; 96 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):65-72. PubMed ID: 25520421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Impact of a national enhanced recovery after surgery programme on patient outcomes of primary total knee replacement: an interrupted time series analysis from "The National Joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man".
    Garriga C; Murphy J; Leal J; Price A; Prieto-Alhambra D; Carr A; Arden NK; Rangan A; Cooper C; Peat G; Fitzpatrick R; Barker K; Judge A
    Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2019 Sep; 27(9):1280-1293. PubMed ID: 31078777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. 5-Year cost/benefit analysis of revision of failed unicompartmental knee replacements (UKRs); not "just" a primary total knee replacement (TKR).
    Jonas SC; Shah R; Mitra A; Deo SD
    Knee; 2014 Aug; 21(4):840-2. PubMed ID: 24857690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.