These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3411260)
1. Newborn screening in the 80's--the automation of follow-up. Kling S; Nash C; Jones D J Med Syst; 1988 Apr; 12(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 3411260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computerized newborn screening in Texas--a multiple microcomputer approach. Therrell BL; Brown LO J Med Syst; 1988 Apr; 12(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 3411258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computerized tracking for newborn screening and follow-up: a review. Meaney FJ J Med Syst; 1988 Apr; 12(2):69-75. PubMed ID: 3045243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pacific northwest regional newborn screening: a paradigm of prevention. Tuerck JM; Buist NR J Med Syst; 1988 Apr; 12(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 3411261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Postrelational database implementation for newborn screening and tracking. Wolfson M; Wu MM J Med Syst; 1988 Apr; 12(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 3411257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computer assisted management of a regionalized newborn screening program. Mordaunt VL; Cunningham GC; Kan K J Med Syst; 1988 Apr; 12(2):77-88. PubMed ID: 3411259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Mass-screening program for congenital hypothyroidism in Japan (author's transl)]. Fukuwatari Y Horumon To Rinsho; 1981 Mar; 29(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 7273432 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Mass neonatal screening. A reality which is sometimes poorly understood]. Farriaux JP Arch Fr Pediatr; 1980 Jun; 37(6):367-70. PubMed ID: 7425786 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Neonatal follow-up. A regional program. Cohen HS; Morgan AM IMJ Ill Med J; 1986 Jul; 170(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 2426229 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Effectiveness of a TEOAE-based screening program. Can a patient-tracking system effectively be organized using modern information technology and central data management? Delb W; Merkel D; Pilorget K; Schmitt J; Plinkert PK Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2004 Apr; 261(4):191-6. PubMed ID: 15103471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Colorado newborn hearing screening project, 1992-1999: on the threshold of effective population-based universal newborn hearing screening. Mehl AL; Thomson V Pediatrics; 2002 Jan; 109(1):E7. PubMed ID: 11773575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Methodological innovations in data gathering: newborn screening linkage with live births records, Michigan, 1/2007-3/2008. Korzeniewski SJ; Grigorescu V; Copeland G; Gu G; Thoburn KK; Rogers JD; Young WI Matern Child Health J; 2010 May; 14(3):360-4. PubMed ID: 19353254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of a high-risk register in newborn hearing screening. Meyer DH; Wolfe VI J Speech Hear Disord; 1975 Nov; 40(4):493-8. PubMed ID: 1234964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Avoiding the cost burden of newborn screening for the poor and uninsured: Mississippi's model. Bender DR J Health Soc Policy; 1992; 3(4):51-8. PubMed ID: 10121847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Counselling in a hospital-based newborn screening service. Headings V Patient Couns Health Educ; 1980 2d Quart; 2(2):80-3. PubMed ID: 10248155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Neonatal screening for phenylketonuria. 3. Altered sex ratio; extent and possible causes. Holtzman NA; Meek AG; Mellits ED; Kallman CH J Pediatr; 1974 Aug; 85(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 4842793 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]