122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34112812)
1. Cric searchable image database as a public platform for conventional pap smear cytology data.
Rezende MT; Silva R; Bernardo FO; Tobias AHG; Oliveira PHC; Machado TM; Costa CS; Medeiros FNS; Ushizima DM; Carneiro CM; Bianchi AGC
Sci Data; 2021 Jun; 8(1):151. PubMed ID: 34112812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Deep Convolution Neural Network for Malignancy Detection and Classification in Microscopic Uterine Cervix Cell Images.
P B S; Faruqi F; K S H; Kudva R
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Nov; 20(11):3447-3456. PubMed ID: 31759371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A review of image analysis and machine learning techniques for automated cervical cancer screening from pap-smear images.
William W; Ware A; Basaza-Ejiri AH; Obungoloch J
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Oct; 164():15-22. PubMed ID: 30195423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automated quantitative fluorescent image analysis of cervical cytology.
Smith JJ; Cowan L; Hemstreet G; Smith ML; Pippitt CH; Doggett R; McGill L
Gynecol Oncol; 1987 Nov; 28(3):241-54. PubMed ID: 3678975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. CervixFormer: A Multi-scale swin transformer-Based cervical pap-Smear WSI classification framework.
Khan A; Han S; Ilyas N; Lee YM; Lee B
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2023 Oct; 240():107718. PubMed ID: 37451230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of a self-administered tampon ThinPrep test with conventional pap smears for cervical cytology.
Budge M; Halford J; Haran M; Mein J; Wright G
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Jun; 45(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 15904447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Conventional Pap smear and liquid-based cytology as screening tools in low-resource settings in Latin America: experience of the Latin American screening study.
Longatto-Filho A; Maeda MY; Erzen M; Branca M; Roteli-Martins C; Naud P; Derchain SF; Hammes L; Matos J; Gontijo R; Sarian LO; Lima TP; Tatti S; Syrjänen S; Syrjänen K
Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(5):500-6. PubMed ID: 16334026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk factors of cervical cancer after a negative cytological diagnosis in Polish cervical cancer screening programme.
Macios A; Didkowska J; Wojciechowska U; Komerska K; Glińska P; Kamiński MF; Nowakowski A
Cancer Med; 2021 May; 10(10):3449-3460. PubMed ID: 33934537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. HDFCN: A Robust Hybrid Deep Network Based on Feature Concatenation for Cervical Cancer Diagnosis on WSI Pap Smear Slides.
Chauhan NK; Singh K; Kumar A; Kolambakar SB
Biomed Res Int; 2023; 2023():4214817. PubMed ID: 37101692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of gel lubricant on cervical cytology.
Charoenkwan K; Ninunanahaeminda K; Khunamornpong S; Srisomboon J; Thorner PS
Acta Cytol; 2008; 52(6):654-8. PubMed ID: 19068667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A pap-smear analysis tool (PAT) for detection of cervical cancer from pap-smear images.
William W; Ware A; Basaza-Ejiri AH; Obungoloch J
Biomed Eng Online; 2019 Feb; 18(1):16. PubMed ID: 30755214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Debris removal in Pap-smear images.
Malm P; Balakrishnan BN; Sujathan VK; Kumar R; Bengtsson E
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 Jul; 111(1):128-38. PubMed ID: 23582663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pap smear screening in an urban STD clinic. Yield of screening and predictors of abnormalities.
Shlay JC; McGill WL; Masloboeva HA; Douglas JM
Sex Transm Dis; 1998 Oct; 25(9):468-75. PubMed ID: 9800258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. DeepCyto: a hybrid framework for cervical cancer classification by using deep feature fusion of cytology images.
Shinde S; Kalbhor M; Wajire P
Math Biosci Eng; 2022 Apr; 19(7):6415-6434. PubMed ID: 35730264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of a slide profiler for endocervical cell detection in no-further-review conventional Pap smears.
Rowe LR; Marshall CJ; Berry M; Larson MA; Bentz JS
Acta Cytol; 2003; 47(4):602-4. PubMed ID: 12920753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Incidental finding of abnormal cervical pathology in hysterectomy specimens after normal preoperative Papanicolaou smears in Thammasat University Hospital.
Chundarat PA; Suwannarurk K; Bhamarapravatana K; Pattaraarchachai J; Thaweekul Y; Mairaing K; Poomtavorn Y
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(14):5811-4. PubMed ID: 25081705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Visual inspection with acetic acid and cytology as screening methods for cervical lesions in Cameroon.
Doh AS; Nkele NN; Achu P; Essimbi F; Essame O; Nkegoum B
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2005 May; 89(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 15847890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A simplified and reliable HPV testing of archival Papanicolaou-stained cervical smears: application to cervical smears from cancer patients starting with cytologically normal smears.
Jacobs MV; Zielinski D; Meijer CJ; Pol RP; Voorhorst FJ; de Schipper FA; Runsink AP; Snijders PJ; Walboomers JM
Br J Cancer; 2000 Apr; 82(8):1421-6. PubMed ID: 10780521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How useful are cervical Pap smears in detecting endometrial carcinomas? A tertiary cancer center experience.
Mehta SP; Patel TS; Jana T; Samanta ST; Malvania R; Trivedi PP; Girdher S
Diagn Cytopathol; 2021 Jan; 49(1):127-131. PubMed ID: 32910561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cervical cancer: Automation of Pap test screening.
Rezende MT; Bianchi AGC; Carneiro CM
Diagn Cytopathol; 2021 Apr; 49(4):559-574. PubMed ID: 33548162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
